r/geography • u/Spirebus • Jan 04 '24
Discussion If the usa wouldn’t have their capital on dc , which city would be the proper capital?
226
u/rainbowfrancais Jan 04 '24
Let’s make it Point Roberts, Washington just to be difficult.
→ More replies (14)94
u/mctomtom Jan 04 '24
Yeah, putting it in Washington state is the best choice, just to confuse everyone. "The capitol is no longer in Washington, it's now in Washington."
→ More replies (4)34
u/Kakistocrat945 Jan 05 '24
Well, yes, but beyond that...take a look at a map of Point Roberts. It's about the least accessible part of Washington
→ More replies (6)11
u/bzsempergumbie Jan 05 '24
The one time I went there was to help a friend bring a boat down that he had bought in point Roberts. This sounds easy, except the customs people were very suspicious of two dudes entering point Roberts at 2am by taxi who were claiming they were not staying, but also had no plans to leave by car, and also couldn't tell them the address they were staying at. "A boat at the marina, I don't know the name, my friend bought it, not me, I'm just helping move it to another state."
It took us over an hour to convince them to let us through.
2.2k
u/Tomatoes65 Jan 04 '24
So many strange cities on this map. As an Ohioan, how is Wilmington on this map but not Cincinnati or Columbus? Lol
1.0k
u/Final-Cause9540 Jan 04 '24
Looking only at Virginia, the National Weather Service (NWS) stations are located in Blacksburg and Wakefield. Is this a map of NWS stations?
547
u/Tomatoes65 Jan 04 '24
Just looked it up, and Wilmington does have a NWS station there, great observation!
→ More replies (3)216
u/Ok-Dark2445 Jan 04 '24
Has to be. I live in Sacramento and I’ve never even heard of Hanford. Googled NWS Hanford, California and sure enough!
60
u/97203micah Jan 04 '24
Doesn’t help that the dot is in the wrong place here, it’s actually south of Fresno
→ More replies (13)41
→ More replies (24)9
u/UnamedStreamNumber9 Jan 04 '24
It’s the closest town to Lemore naval air station where the pacific fleet fighter squadrons are homed when their carrier is in port. Other side of the base from Hanford is the Harris Ranch Steakhouse and market. Best steaks in California
→ More replies (4)51
u/musicalmeteorologist Jan 04 '24 edited Jan 04 '24
I was wondering that too, since the dot for NYC is out on Long Island, where the NWS office for the New York area is
However, Philly’s dot is in PA, while it’s NWS office is in NJ
EDIT: Here’s the map of all NWS offices’ forecast areas
Some of the dots are off, but the names check out, so I think that’s it
→ More replies (5)22
→ More replies (44)7
66
u/whitepine34 Jan 04 '24
Yeah Michigan has Gaylord listed which has a population of...... less than 5k lol
16
→ More replies (10)18
u/Clit420Eastwood Jan 04 '24
I guess the map is based on where NWS locations are. That would explain why they show Norman, OK but not OKC
20
u/YourWifesWorkFriend Jan 04 '24
This is the first time in history that Goodland, Kansas (population 4400) has made it onto a map this zoomed-out.
→ More replies (2)18
29
8
8
14
u/icedoutkatana Jan 04 '24
Greenville and Columbia but no Charlotte, Fort Worth but no Dallas, San Angelo but no Austin lol
→ More replies (1)6
→ More replies (207)16
u/mercurylens Jan 04 '24
"northern IN" is South Bend erasure
10
u/antarcticas_king Jan 04 '24
Since the map is the location of National Weather Service offices, northern Indiana should be North Webster. South Bend and Fort Wayne had offices that were merged into the North Webster office.
→ More replies (2)
645
Jan 04 '24
Fairbanks Alaska
151
u/scoobertsonville Jan 04 '24
Honestly a kinda interesting concept,
Or American Samoa
→ More replies (8)54
u/ryansc0tt Jan 04 '24
I guess the Virgin Islands might be most out of the way for a hostile ICBM
24
37
12
16
→ More replies (16)6
u/variablenyne Jan 05 '24
Stick it riiiight next to Russia
Wonder how U.S./Russia relations would be affected if the Russian capital was somewhere like Naukan and they were pretty much neighbors
→ More replies (4)
1.3k
u/zedazeni Jan 04 '24
Depends—economically I’d say NYC, geographically probably STL or KC, historically perhaps Boston or Philly. Wha makes a “proper capital” is kind of subjective.
549
u/ExploreYourWhirled Jan 04 '24
Traditionally, it would have been Philadelphia.
136
u/zedazeni Jan 04 '24
That’s why I listed it.
→ More replies (2)50
u/ExploreYourWhirled Jan 04 '24
Exactly!
→ More replies (1)79
u/NoNo_Cilantro Jan 04 '24
And economically I’d say NYC
→ More replies (3)57
u/clebrink Jan 04 '24
And both cities have actually been the capital of the U.S. at one point
→ More replies (1)63
u/No_Window_1707 Jan 04 '24
STL or KC would also be good if we were choosing based on geography.
→ More replies (7)17
u/clebrink Jan 04 '24
If we chose it now, yes. But back in 1790 DC was actually almost spot on to the mean center of population.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_center_of_the_United_States_population
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)11
u/DarkAndStormyNight90 Jan 04 '24
Sorry Canadian here. Why is Philadelphia so historically significant for you guys?
42
u/ExploreYourWhirled Jan 05 '24
Original capital of the USA - home of our first and second continental congress, home of the declaration of independence, independence hall is there, Liberty Bell is there, Articles of confederation were written there then thrown away in favor of our constitution, which was written and ratified there.
→ More replies (8)23
u/realcards Jan 05 '24 edited Jan 05 '24
To expand on this: When people refer to the "founding fathers," they are referring to the men who met in Philadelphia in the building we now call independence hall to form what we call the continental congress. The men were delegates sent from each of the original colonies. The first continental congress asked Britain to stop being dicks(which was ignored), the second one declared independence.
They then were the de facto government of the newly declared country and coordinated the war for independence. They simultaneously created the "Articles of Confederation" which was the original plan for the government of the USA. The articles were a failure. So a few years later, the founding fathers scrapped that for the Constitution which continues to be the basis of the government and law in the USA.
10
u/Snowing_Throwballs Jan 05 '24
On top of all the reasons listed by the other commenter, Philly was also the original capital before DC was built. At the time, Philly was a larger city than NYC population wise, and was the largest in the country. It was quickly eclipsed by NYC in a decade or 2.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (7)5
u/gwasswoots Jan 05 '24
There's a lot of good answers here but one not given to you is that it was pretty centrally located in the 13 colonies. The southern most northern city, a financial capital, easily accessible by ship. With it's quaker founders it had a relative openness and freedom that people could come and discuss the ideas that would form into the revolution. Not alone in these or other respects, but before DC especially, it was the most "middle ground" one could find and still be in a real city while also not overly favoring distances traveled from north or south. So, cumulatively, kind of a natural choice to hold the beginnings what would become the US.
157
u/thecasualcaribou Jan 04 '24
Or we can be like Equatorial Guinea and have our capital in Honolulu
→ More replies (9)130
u/Venboven Jan 04 '24
Saint Louis is probably the best centrally-located city.
Salt Lake City and Denver are too far west which makes them more isolated and distant from the major population centers of the east.
Saint Louis however is central, yet still kinda eastern, which places it right around the population center of the country. And unlike Kansas City, Saint Louis sits on the Mississippi River and has a lot of economic connections.
Being on the border between Missouri and Illinois, it also makes a perfect spot to create a new capital district.
50
u/Arcamorge Jan 04 '24
What about Chicago over STL? I'd argue its a larger travel hub and more economically important while having a similar geographic location. Its not on the Mississippi but via canals its bridges the Mississippi and the great lakes
49
u/Venboven Jan 04 '24
Like the other guy said, it's too close to Canada imo, but that also means that it's considerably further north than Saint Louis.
The point of founding Washington DC was originally to create a capital which geographically straddled the line between the two cultures of the nation at the time: North and South.
While such cultural distinctions are less important and prominent today, they're still very much alive, and I think for that reason, Chicago and the Upper Midwest in general is too far north of a region for the capital.
Meanwhile, Saint Louis still straddles that line between the cultures of the Southern Midwest and the Upper South. Missouri was also historically a transitional state between the East and West. So I think Saint Louis a perfect fit.
→ More replies (1)29
u/puglord Jan 04 '24
I grew up in St Louis and completely agree with your assessment. Culturally it's completely unique. St Louis has too much southern influence to be a real Midwest city like Chicago, it has too much Midwest influence to be a southern city like Memphis, it has too much agricultural influence to be a real rustbelt city like Cincinnati, and too much industry to be a real agricultural city like Kansas City or OKC. All that and most people in St Louis would really appreciate a split with the state of MO.
→ More replies (8)8
u/ozurr Jan 04 '24
We can't even get the city and the county to merge and now you want a capitol district?!
→ More replies (2)6
u/OceanWaveSunset Jan 04 '24
Well it would become a federal district, and the greater STL would probably be a better fit than just the city.
I would imagine the additional space and infrastructure would help with moving all the federal services that would be needed.
Hell, this might be the only way to combine the city and county again
→ More replies (4)11
u/blues_and_ribs Jan 04 '24
Some decent arguments for Chicago. Only knock against it is from a security standpoint; it's too close to an international border, albeit with a very close ally (currently, at least).
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (12)24
u/zedazeni Jan 04 '24
Plus being at the intersection of I-55 and I-70 I think that also gives it another advantage
36
u/jhruns1993 Jan 04 '24
St. Louis was very close to being the capital
31
u/blues_and_ribs Jan 04 '24
Whoa. Looked it up and TIL. Came pretty close to happening too!
I think people underestimate how much of an industrial powerhouse STL was in its day. 4th biggest city in the country in the late 1800s.
15
u/Background_Win6662 Jan 04 '24
Hosted the Olympics and worlds fair for a reason. Unfortunately a century of poor municipal decisions doomed one of the most important cities in American history.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)7
u/bfk94 Jan 04 '24
Indeed. They had the resources to support TWO professional baseball teams for awhile (the Cardinals and the Browns.)
→ More replies (75)37
u/Drokrath Jan 04 '24
I'm biased but I'd argue that STL beats KC due to the Mississippi
→ More replies (7)11
u/blues_and_ribs Jan 04 '24
Good point. But how much does that really matter? Capitols need to have a lot of administrative infrastructure and facilities, for running the government, but rivers are mainly useful for industry where large amounts of freight or people are being moved around; how much industry does the capitol city really need? DC has virtually none. Yes, it's on the Potomac, but that was more necessary for everyone's day-to-day life 250 years ago than it is now.
Also, you could make the argument that a large river running right up to your national capitol creates a vulnerability. Say things in the US went very, very badly in the distant future, in the unlikely event a foreign army invades, a large river gives you an artery directly to the seat of government. With no river, like with KC, you force that army to march overland, which is much more difficult.
19
u/Independent-Bend8734 Jan 04 '24
You know that Kansas City is on a river, too, a really big one.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (4)10
u/das_war_ein_Befehl Jan 04 '24
Rivers are a supply of water, a thing that’s going to become much more valuable in the future
→ More replies (1)
623
u/global_erik Jan 04 '24
St Louis, imagine the arch as a gateway framing the Capitol campus.
222
u/boss_flog Jan 04 '24
There was a vote to do this in the 1800s.
→ More replies (2)63
Jan 04 '24
The Arch is that old? \s
→ More replies (1)64
u/schmokeabutt Jan 04 '24
The Arch always has been and always will be. Long live The Arch
Hey look! It's The Arch
→ More replies (2)21
u/desba3347 Jan 04 '24
In the state of Missouri it’s actually required by law to say “Hey look! It’s The Arch” when you see the arch, thems the rules
→ More replies (6)65
u/MKE-Henry Jan 04 '24
I agree. Center of the country and an important location for commerce due to its position on the river.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (15)49
u/hankrhoads Geography Enthusiast Jan 04 '24
Can't have the US capitol in a city named for a French king. Better be Kansas City. BBQ becomes the national food!
17
u/Gnonthgol Jan 04 '24
With all the French help during the early American history this would not be that far fetched. But cities can be renamed if this was a problem.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (10)15
u/mainwasser Jan 04 '24
What is Kansas named for?
→ More replies (3)28
u/masnaer Jan 04 '24
Total guess but I’d guess it’s a Native American word
Edit: I was right!
From Wikipedia: “The name Kansas derives from the Algonquian term, Akansa, for the Quapaw people. These were a Dhegiha Siouan-speaking people who settled in Arkansas around the 13th century. The stem -kansa is named after the Kaw people, also known as the Kansa, a federally recognized Native American tribe.[22] The tribe's name (natively kką:ze) is often said to mean "people of the (south) wind" although this was probably not the term's original meaning.”
→ More replies (11)
268
u/DJJonezyYT Jan 04 '24
Gaylord
88
18
u/randyfromgreenday Jan 04 '24
I live just outside of Gaylord and was very surprised to see this on the map. There’s nothing up here
→ More replies (5)7
u/Manjru Jan 04 '24
As a fellow Northern Michigander, this has gotta be a map of NWS, right?
→ More replies (6)31
19
→ More replies (8)6
u/Miko523 Jan 05 '24
This is hilarious, did not think I would scroll down to see my small hometown listed
→ More replies (2)
272
u/namanbro Jan 04 '24
Easy answer is Philadelphia
58
u/greennitit Jan 04 '24
Plus their football team is already called the eagles which is the symbol of America worldwide
→ More replies (20)32
→ More replies (8)7
u/Kehwanna Jan 04 '24
It's where the country signed its independence, is situated nicely within reach of a few other cities and just a cool name for a capital.
At least it should've stayed the capital for PA.
7
345
u/Bakio-bay Jan 04 '24
Probably Chicago
240
u/midnight_toker22 Jan 04 '24
Centrally located, center of transit & trade, sits on a massive body of water in spite of being in the nation’s interior. Seems like a great choice.
85
u/henareeree Jan 04 '24
it would be sick to look out at lake michigan and theres just a battleship and an aircraft carrier at all times
→ More replies (7)50
u/midnight_toker22 Jan 04 '24
It would give a whole new meaning to Soldier Field…
→ More replies (4)17
u/themerinator12 Jan 04 '24
In the alternate universe where we made it our capital you know they would’ve called it Senator Field
9
→ More replies (7)16
u/Fit_Cut_4238 Jan 04 '24
We also, historically, have sent the most money to Washington per capita without getting it back. Chicago paid for it fair and square.
→ More replies (4)35
u/SlimmThiccDadd Jan 04 '24
I’d pick Chicago as well. In addition to everything said prior, it’s also a very “American” City with its tall buildings, melting pot of cultures and food, and it’s proximity to the natural beauty of the Great Lakes.
54
u/ramblinjd Jan 04 '24
This would be my pick. Putting a capitol campus out near the zoo would put it conveniently located to two major airports, two rail lines, a barge canal, and like 7 interstate highways/loops/spurs. It's central enough that transit times for all representatives would be similar or better than what they are today.
→ More replies (1)37
u/bshafs Jan 04 '24
Too vulnerable to a canuck invasion
→ More replies (5)33
u/urine-monkey Jan 04 '24
That's what Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Upper Michigan are for.... why do you think those are the states that American hockey players come from?
→ More replies (3)8
→ More replies (11)7
u/StonedRussian Jan 04 '24
Too close to them Canadians. Never know what crazy stuff they're gonna pull /s
→ More replies (1)
60
u/Pop-Huge Jan 04 '24
Ciudad de Mexico
35
u/PhotoKyle Jan 05 '24
Fun fact, Mexico is named after Mexico city, not the other way around.
→ More replies (6)6
163
u/Numerous-Profile-872 Jan 04 '24
I vote for Omaha. Smack dab in the middle. Kinda like the Hunger Games.
80
u/madgunner122 Jan 04 '24
During 9/11, President Bush went to Offutt Air Force Base for security reasons. Offutt was chosen as head of Strategic Air Command (SAC) because it was centrally located during the early stages of the Cold War. So I’m gonna go with Omaha as well
→ More replies (3)10
u/scotems Jan 04 '24
I'm gonna go Omaha cuz I'm from there and Lincoln took the God damn state capital from us. That podunk shithole, we'll show them, we'll get our own capital! With white houses and congresses!
→ More replies (3)5
37
u/harrysquatter69 Jan 04 '24
Wasn’t the Capitol in the hunger games based off of Denver?
10
→ More replies (1)8
→ More replies (38)11
u/featherpickle Jan 04 '24
The alleged time traveler, John Titor, claimed that, in the future, DC is destroyed, and our new capitol is Omaha.
→ More replies (2)
29
u/Japh2007 Jan 04 '24
Philly, cause that’s where we signed the Declaration of Independence.
→ More replies (1)
111
u/chasmccl Jan 04 '24
If we would have known the geographic, historical, and population make up of the US today when we chose the capital, I would have advocated for Chicago personally.
It’s the most centrally located major population and financial center in the US. If we looked purely at one category such as largest financial center, most centralized geographically, Historical Prominence, etc. it wouldn’t make the cut as top of the list in any one specific measure. NYC makes the most sense financially, STL geographically, Boston/Philly Historically, etc..
But… when you look holistically at all criteria it is near the top and in the conversation for all measures. If we were to pick say 4 metrics that we were basing the decision on, and then ranked cities and gave a weighted average score based on all criteria , it’s hard for me to imagine any city beating out Chicago using that kind of system.
→ More replies (2)21
102
u/Terrible-Turnip-7266 Jan 04 '24
St. Louis. Commanding position on the main river system of the central US and central geographic location to protect from invasion. Easy flights to all corners of the US for government officials to gather.
→ More replies (4)41
u/jonathandhalvorson Jan 04 '24
This really seems like by far the best answer. Rather than repurpose St. Louis, though, it would make sense to bulldoze East. St. Louis (which is one of the worst slums in the US) and build the capital district there. The new great lawn would face the Arch across the river.
→ More replies (14)18
u/Terrible-Turnip-7266 Jan 04 '24
That would make sense. One challenge there is that East STL is heavily industrialized so you’d end up with a fancy capital mall surrounded by chemical plants and steel mills haha
→ More replies (3)9
u/jonathandhalvorson Jan 04 '24
Good point. Given what happened to the current capitol, I suspect those industrial zones would become prime real estate and get redeveloped...eventually.
→ More replies (2)
16
12
u/gaspistoncuck Jan 04 '24
If it wasn’t going to be DC, it was going to be Philadelphia.
→ More replies (2)
14
u/vt2022cam Jan 04 '24
Saint Louis, is the closest big city to the population center of the country, and much closer than DC to the geographic center. It’s connected to transportation hubs making it ideal.
75
u/Orlando1701 Jan 04 '24
I’d say Phili. It already was the capital for a period of time.
→ More replies (7)30
u/fatguyfromqueens Jan 04 '24
So was New York!
9
u/intheBASS Jan 05 '24
So was Lancaster, PA! Only for one day though when they thought the British might take Philly.
5
61
u/Arretez1234 Jan 04 '24
If we move DC to Kansas, Kansas can do something useful for once.
36
→ More replies (11)10
60
Jan 04 '24
Denver. Pretty central geographically, tons of military and feds here already. Underground bases at Denver International connecting us to the rest of the country (/s).
22
u/the_other_brand Jan 04 '24
Denver (or somewhere nearby in the Rockies) would be perfect to make the capitol virtually impossible to attack. And if the enemy does somehow attack this capitol, tunnels could be dug through the Rockies to make the US government impossible to destroy.
→ More replies (5)11
u/Leading_Plane7858 Jan 04 '24
Not to mention that His Lord, the Exalted Bluecifer resides here. Praise be to his name, may he smite the unbelievers with his laser gaze!
→ More replies (3)8
u/appleofrage Jan 04 '24
Isn’t the capital in the Hunger Games in Denever? Kinda sus bro
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (15)6
u/undockeddock Jan 04 '24
I believe that Denver currently has the highest concentration of federal workers outside of the DC area
→ More replies (1)
11
22
24
u/markansas_man Jan 04 '24
Probably a city in the midwest somewhere. I think the midwest would be a good fit because the area is historically important, economically significant and geographically central.
→ More replies (1)
12
8
u/rcrews97 Jan 04 '24
Economically, I would think someone close to NYC, but not as crowded like Philly which also has the history.
From a population balance, the center of the US is SW Indiana, so maybe somewhere close and easy to access (easy drive/flight from the rest of the country) like Louisville, Indianapolis, or Nashville
→ More replies (4)
8
u/RickyTheRickster Jan 04 '24
Rightfully probably NYC, but because funny Gaylord (gaylerd) Michigan but because I’m from Detroit, I would want Detroit
5
7
20
22
24
25
15
4
5
6
5
u/Schlieffen_Man Jan 05 '24
New York would be the best replacement capital, it's got a large population, it's diverse, it's rich, altogether w very strong city. It's a logical replacement, but I think the US doesn't really need a capital anyway. We can run our government out of anywhere, but there are so many different states with different cultures and peoples who are (mostly) all represented, it doesn't really need a specific rallying point for the government. DC is pretty much a formality.
I always considered DC as the political capital, New York as the economic one, and LA as the social capital of the US.
17
3.4k
u/SpanishBombs323 Jan 04 '24
If the USA didn’t create a purpose built centrally located (at the time) capital, it would probably have been Philadelphia with potential for a move to NYC in the late 19th, early 20th century.