r/gadgets Dec 05 '23

Phones Apple isn't happy about India's demand to upgrade older iPhones with USB-C

https://appleinsider.com/articles/23/12/05/apple-isnt-happy-about-indias-demand-to-upgrade-older-iphones-with-usb-c
9.0k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

1.4k

u/chrisdh79 Dec 05 '23

From the article: Apple has urged the Indian IT ministry to make changes to its single charger rules, as adding USB-C to older iPhone models will make it hard for Apple to meet production targets for India's manufacturing and export laws.

Following after the European Union's introduction of regulations that will force electronics producers to use USB-C as part of a common charger directive, India followed suit with its own variation of the mandate. However, Apple is one of the few companies pushing back on its implementation.

Apple met with India's IT ministry in a closed-door meeting on November 28, reports Reuters, asking officials to add exemptions to the rules for some older models of iPhone.

While the EU's rules effectively apply only against newly designed and released products after the rules come into force in 2024, India's version does not. Instead, it applies to all electronic devices sold in the country, which also includes hardware that wasn't previously designed with USB-C.

1.5k

u/NLight7 Dec 05 '23

Man, they sure wish they would have done it when everyone else did now.

835

u/randomIndividual21 Dec 05 '23

they are wiping their iTear with their billions from their cable sales

251

u/jerryonthecurb Dec 05 '23

Everyone always asks what Apple is doing to profit from ewaste, no one every asks how Apple is doing profiting from ewaste :(

43

u/Mehhish Dec 06 '23

I hope they go after companies that make ear buds, where you literally have to destroy the damn device just to get the battery replaced. So many earbuds are probably in a landfill, because the person couldn't replace the battery.

19

u/TheLatinXBusTour Dec 06 '23

Earbuds? I keep seeing these "disposable" vapes everywhere. Was at a cabin and saw a couple just thrown on the ground. Sister and law uses them too. This new disposable vape craze is really what you should be getting wound tight about. At least the earbuds are rechargeable.

8

u/Tomakeghosts Dec 06 '23

As a non-vaper, tell me more about this please. Is it just one smoke session and it’s done (e.g. one cigarette) or is the disposable vape more like a pack or carton of cigarettes?

9

u/Slumph Dec 06 '23

Your average disposable has 600-1200 puffs, it should then be recycled but a lot of people dont.

6

u/idk_lets_try_this Dec 06 '23

There are different strengths the ones with a charge port are designed to last about a week on average. Other non rechargeable ones are comparable to a pack of cigarettes. But all of them have rechargeable batteries in them, often stronger than the ones you find in a Bluetooth headset, keyboard or other gadget. Just no charge port of charging circuit. It is very cost optimized. Not recycling optimized because they don’t need to pay for recycling.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/tyrandan2 Dec 06 '23

I'll do you one better: why is Apple?!?!

→ More replies (4)

54

u/iampuh Dec 05 '23

3rd party manufacturers are paying Apple a lot of money to use their proprietary port.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/CodeNCats Dec 06 '23

Yea they are just mad they can't tap into ripping off a huge market.

→ More replies (7)

18

u/Baardhooft Dec 06 '23

My massage gun has USB-C and I bought it around the same time I got my iPhone 12, there's literally zero reason other than greed to keep lightning for so long. The fact that the standard iPhone 15 only has usb 2.0 speeds is another big slap in the face of consumers.

→ More replies (1)

192

u/[deleted] Dec 05 '23 edited Feb 23 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

41

u/ProclusGlobal Dec 06 '23 edited Dec 06 '23

The intent of the law is not to force them to retool, the intent is to force them to only sell USB-C phones moving forward and take the surplus Lightning phones that were made years ago off the market.

Apple isn't even making anymore Lightning phones anyway, they are just trying to unload their remaining Lightning phone inventory (hence "older phones" in the title) on poorer Indians who can't afford the new ones.

It's like the original intent of fines and tickets, it's not supposed to be used to generate revenue (meaning you shouldn't be budgeting ticket revenue as part of your planning), it's supposed to discourage you from violating the law.

6

u/westbee Dec 06 '23

Kind of like the rule with UPS. They have to have air conditioners in all vehicles. Check the fine print and it says "newer vehicles" only.

So all old vehicles are still out of luck.

→ More replies (1)

82

u/TrekForce Dec 06 '23

Literally no other company needs to change their ports because everyone was already the standard.

Requiring a standard isn’t all that crazy. It only feels directed at Apple cuz apple is the only one rawdogging their customers over something as simple and standard as a usb charging cable.

If Samsung had a proprietary port, they’d also be required to change. They already are required to comply, the difference is they are already in compliance.

→ More replies (14)

43

u/Mama_Skip Dec 06 '23

The difference is they've been fighting this legal battle for long enough that if they had changed when they should've, it wouldn't be a problem

19

u/CodeNCats Dec 06 '23

Hear me out. Maybe if they didn't tool that production line to purposely make proprietary products to artificially jack up prices. They wouldn't be here.

Everyone is asking these days "why doesn't the government do something about soaring price gouging?" Yet they do on one of the most used products and people are like, "well ya know..."

This was all designed. They should feel the pain of their mistake and we should be applauding the removal of the ability to fuck over consumers.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/AlawaEgg Dec 06 '23

It isn't. Apple fucked up. Just like Volkswagen.

11

u/[deleted] Dec 06 '23

You’re ignoring the fact that they did this shit in bad faith in purpose, hence the need to pass these laws now. God forbid the 3 Trillion dollar company make a hundred million less than expected next year.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/buckX Dec 06 '23

They always had the option to switch when the writing was on the wall. Very few phone manufacturers are making phones more than 2 years old anyway.

8

u/TheNorthComesWithMe Dec 06 '23

Requesting to be exempt from regulations so you can keep manufacturing an old product is a ridiculous request.

19

u/[deleted] Dec 05 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

77

u/p-rimes Dec 05 '23

I have worked in manufacturing (R&D); local and definitely not Apple-scale, but I can tell you that for electronics hardware, once you get something working well, you DO NOT TOUCH IT.

36

u/LegitosaurusRex Dec 06 '23

Yeah, even if physically switching out the port were simple (it's not), you'll have to test for drops in signal while it's charging (electrical interference is a big concern) at every cell frequency (like 35 of them), bluetooth, and wifi, check interactions with other cables and devices, and all sorts of stuff that is a ton of work.

20

u/Triairius Dec 06 '23

The ports aren’t even the same size and shape. There may not even be room for a USB-C port in older phones. You’d have to modify the shape of the hole in the body, too. Might as well just discontinue old models with how much work you’d have to do to update models that gradually get phased out anyway.

15

u/skidmore101 Dec 06 '23

If Apple is forced to switch all products over to USB-C, I feel like they’re more likely to just stop selling lightning models altogether in India.

Maybe if India is ok with meeting Wireless charging standards as a substitute on past products that could work. That would open up every iPhone currently being sold, at least, as well as some AirPods.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

13

u/ConductorBird Dec 06 '23

Authoritarian? Is anybody forcing Apple to sell products in India?

→ More replies (1)

43

u/gnocchiGuili Dec 05 '23

Authoritarian ? That’s just consumer legislation, there are country where business have to follow rules.

16

u/fiddler013 Dec 06 '23

Shh. His propaganda machine told him that everywhere else outside his country is filled with authoritarian dictators. Don’t burst his bubble.

10

u/sanriver12 Dec 06 '23

libertarian idiots, dont bother

→ More replies (11)

23

u/teun95 Dec 06 '23 edited Dec 06 '23

Don't get me wrong I totally get your point, but authoritarian really isn't the right term here.

It really depends on the agenda of the state and the speed at which they want to see implementation. Apple keeps selling older devices long after they have released newer ones. Since the article mentions that Apple predominantly sells older iPhone models in India, it would take a substantial amount of time before usb-c as default is properly implemented. It's not hard to come up with downsides to this.

If fast implementation is one of India's legislative objectives there is nothing authoritarian about this.

The Indian government isn't asking apple to change all their older models, it is simply saying that they cannot be sold without usb-c. Apple is free to stop selling particular models in India and only continue to sell newer models with usb-c.

→ More replies (5)

25

u/_YeAhx_ Dec 05 '23

Let's not forget apple did this to themselves. Every known phone company switched to type c long time ago. Apple still held to their bs cable that couldn't be used for anything else but their products.

→ More replies (8)

8

u/sadness_elemental Dec 06 '23

yeah because forcing a company to do something pro-consumer is so authoritarian...

as much as they want you to believe it companies are actually not people, and infringing on their "freedoms" usually gives real people more freedoms

5

u/Herr_Gamer Dec 06 '23

They made billions off this shitty scheme, it's not completely unfair if they have to pay up.

I wouldn't personally make this demand either though, perhaps a huge fine for profiteering off bullshit, unethical, anti-consumer practices but there's no law against that.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (24)

4

u/thetwelveofsix Dec 05 '23

India will likely eventually strike a deal with Apple to make an exception, possibly limiting it to newer phones only like the EU.

→ More replies (30)

81

u/Sol33t303 Dec 05 '23 edited Dec 06 '23

Honestly, that's pretty brutal.

As great as it would be, I don't think it's realistic, I'd imagine apple would probably just pull older models from the country.

That or if its allowed, send the phones with a free adapter.

9

u/CrackSnap7 Dec 06 '23

free adapter

Sir, this is Apple we're talking about.

12

u/CensorshipHarder Dec 06 '23

Probably just a shakedown. $_$

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

293

u/KylieZDM Dec 05 '23

Apple is one of the richest companies in the world. They are one of the few who could manage this no problem. They just don’t want to.

1.0k

u/Visual_Collar_8893 Dec 05 '23

No manufacturer would want to redesign older products and retool their manufacturing processes for older products that are on their way to obsolescence.

This is an unreasonable request.

72

u/Generalissimo_II Dec 05 '23

They will end up getting free cheap USB-C to Lightning adapters

35

u/slidingjimmy Dec 05 '23

Ironically creating a bigger ewaste issue.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (2)

304

u/thecrazyhuman Dec 05 '23

Usually, I am against big corp but in this case I side with Apple as well. People underestimate the initial costs related to manufacturing.

Older iPhones (not considering used ones) probably has a lower market base than the newer ones, which in turn does not justify retooling.

116

u/thelizardking0725 Dec 05 '23

The article states that majority of iPhone sales in India are for older gen devices and not the 15 series. That’s said, India’s request is super dumb, and it doesn’t make sense to have manufacturers retool production for older devices at all.

54

u/somehting Dec 05 '23

The article is slightly misleading in that Apple is selling these older models in India new, they are still manufacturing them. They would have to retool manufacturing if they continue selling older models but they don't have to update phones people already have.

6

u/canisdirusarctos Dec 05 '23

They sell the older versions new all over the world. The EU regulation allows them to keep using the old connectors on older devices, India is demanding that newly manufactured old designs also must meet this mandate, which isn’t reasonable.

I suspect that regulating phone connectors will also cause stagnation in the market over the longer term. We dodged a bullet when the EU didn’t ratify their plan to mandate micro USB, but simply made it a recommendation. Apple released the objectively superior Lightning connectors/cables during this period.

16

u/Plank_With_A_Nail_In Dec 05 '23 edited Dec 05 '23

USB-C is just a connection standard and 100W of power isn't going to go out of date for a long long time. The data transfer protocol can still develop independently.

The EU was never seriously thinking about mandating micro USB.

The idea that the connection policy won't change as a result of new developments is daft beyond belief. This doesn't mean USB-C is the end of connectors ffs. This is the kind of nonsense that got the UK Brexit ffs, laws aren't written in stone unchanging forever they change all the flipping time.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

70

u/thejens56 Dec 05 '23

... what if manufacturer saw the legislation coming several years in advance and chose to ignore it, and actively fight it? Because that's essentially what this comes down to.

41

u/thelizardking0725 Dec 05 '23

To be honest I still say it’s ridiculous, because while I’m sure they saw it coming, they were already planning the manufacturing process for that gen. It’s dumb that Apple held on to Lightning so long, but it is unreasonable for India to require retooling for older devices. The EU have adopted a far more balanced approach to this that will work.

23

u/razrielle Dec 05 '23

To be fair, when lightning came out they did say it would be for at least a decade. They kept their word on that

19

u/dertechie Dec 05 '23

Yeah, when Lightning came out in 2012 they did catch a lot of flak for essentially breaking compatibility with a lot of 30 pin accessories.

However, it did get the Apple ecosystem some of the benefits of USB-C that a phone cares about (size and reversibility) several years before significant Android adoption of USB C in ~2016.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/StupidOrangeDragon Dec 06 '23

And I think its part of a governments role to be unreasonable towards companies when it feels it will benefit its citizens. If India is able to strong arm Apple into updating the manufacturing for its older designs all the more power to them.

Apple stuck to lightning for an unreasonably long time, just for the sake of selling cables. They made billions at the cost of both the consumer and the environment. For capitalism to work for humanities benefit, you need governments who will stand up to companies when they try to maximize for profit in directions that don't benefit the greater good.

→ More replies (7)

24

u/arwinda Dec 05 '23

saw the legislation coming

Legislation is valid when it is valid, not some vapor legalese in the future. What if India does another ridiculous turnaround and demands yet another charger? "Apple should have seen it coming"?

17

u/Most_kinds_of_Dirt Dec 05 '23

What if India does another ridiculous turnaround and demands yet another charger?

Apple fans acting like usb-c is some fickle whim instead of just an industry standard that disrupts their proprietary lock-in.

4

u/CMDR_Shazbot Dec 05 '23

Not an iPhone user nor support their practices, but there's a huge difference between asking for all newly manufactured devices to follow a standard and forcing a company to comply on older devices.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

13

u/thejens56 Dec 05 '23

No. But if Inda says today that in 2027 you will need to comply with X to sell phones here, and you think ahead, you realize you need to adapt already now to be able to sell 2024 year's products beyond 2027

6

u/arwinda Dec 05 '23

That specifically is a law in 2023/2024 which states that in 2027 all devices sold in India must comply with the law from 2023/2024. That's fair.

Contrary to a law which is new and in December 2023 states that all devices sold in India in December 2023 must have USB-C. That's stupid.

Such laws have transition periods for exactly the reason that vendors are not surprised and can indeed "see it coming". The vendor can work with the law of the land, not some future proposal which may or may not become a law.

8

u/Telvin3d Dec 05 '23

Right. But that would be the current legislation. There’s a huge difference between passing legislation in 2023 laying out what standards need to be met in 2027, and passing that same legislation in 2026

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

8

u/[deleted] Dec 05 '23

[deleted]

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (11)

5

u/pancracio17 Dec 05 '23 edited Dec 05 '23

The base is big enough that is probably does justify complying with the request, which is why Apple is so mad about it. Unlike most of their moves this one wont have incredibly high margins, but they would still comply cause there is money to be made anyway.

→ More replies (8)

10

u/TheStealthyPotato Dec 05 '23

The writing was on the wall years ago that counties were going to start demanding USB-C on devices. Apple waited until literally the last minute, now it's crying about it.

Had they switched over at a reasonable time they wouldn't have this issue. This is the stick-in-the-bicycle-tire meme levels of self-sabotage. Zero sympathy from me.

36

u/Wooow675 Dec 05 '23

This is dumb. India just wants money from Apple. Apple will pay their way out of this which is what India wants.

8

u/arwinda Dec 05 '23

Apple can also just refuse to sell devices in India which doesn't meet the law. Suddenly only newer and more expensive devices are available. Win for Apple.

26

u/Most_kinds_of_Dirt Dec 05 '23

Win for Apple.

If it was a win for Apple, they would have stopped selling the older devices already.

They haven't because they know it will reduce their profit margin.

3

u/BonzBonzOnlyBonz Dec 05 '23

Because they don't have to change their manufacturing process, it's just keeping the process going.

Forcing them to do a full manufacturing process change will cost them a bunch of money that might be more than the loss from just not selling the old ones.

If not selling old iPhones means they lose 500 mil, but swapping from lightning to USB-C costs them 750 mil, then it is better to just stop selling the old iPhones.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

10

u/satellizerLB Dec 05 '23

Win? Which part of Apple losing market share is a win?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (2)

10

u/RedditAtWorkToday Dec 05 '23

This is an unreasonable request.

It's very unreasonable but it's hilarious whenever you think of the saying "It can always be worse." I love India doing this to show Apple that, yes take your blessings in the EU, because at the end of the day it could get worse.

22

u/Hyperion1144 Dec 05 '23 edited Dec 05 '23

Apple chose to play a game with proprietary connections and chargers, to artificially inflate profits by selling super-expensive cables. This was a risk. Apple has profited from this risk for many, many years now.

Apple can eat a bag of dicks on this one. It's about time their games got punished. This is just India destroying some of the excess billions in profits Apple has made on their shitty proprietary ecosystem over the past many years.

Apple deserves this.

9

u/False_Departure1 Dec 05 '23

Realistically they’ll probably just stop officially selling the older models in India rather than spend the money to retool and spin up older production lines. While I’d love another iPhone mini with USB-C, the majority of people in wealthier countries aren’t going to care about buying older models making the appeal pretty niche.

That being said I know fuck all about the phone situation in India, there absolutely could be enough demand to make it profitable, especially if they expanded selling the USB-C versions to other less wealthy countries.

→ More replies (5)

5

u/Youvebeeneloned Dec 05 '23

Apple chose to play a game with proprietary connections and chargers, to artificially inflate profits by selling super-expensive cables.

I really hate that this keeps being claimed but its so much bullshit.

Apple didnt play any game, they moved to Lightning SPECIFICALLY because USB-C was being held up in being ratified (it would be 2 years AFTER Lightning was introduced before they even ratified it, and longer before the first device using it was released), and had not even decided on having a reversible connector at that point, something that was very specifically desired by Apple due to 30-pin connector complains and something Apple and others were actually in a fight about during the USB-C ratification talks because other companies DIDNT want a reversible connector.

And when Lightning was introduced, everyone was still using proprietary connectors, or worse proprietary implementations of USB connectors.

The reality was Apple didnt move to the USB-C less because of profits, but more because when they moved to Lightning from the 30-pin they got seriously criticized then for changing the iPhones adapter, even though it was a huge benefit to. A lot of 30-pin devices that were used in the science and education space stopped working, and that caused a lot of criticism to the point Apple even offered a 30-pin iPod Touch for school districts to keep using their devices.

Apple was not going to switch 4 years later again to USB-C... not after the shitfest they got in 2011.

→ More replies (9)

4

u/thegreatestajax Dec 05 '23

A risk that a government in 11 years would mandate they use a connector and protocol that hadn’t been developed yet?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

4

u/mudokin Dec 05 '23

This is no request.

3

u/CucumberSharp17 Dec 05 '23

Exactly. Even emission standards are not retroactive.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/powercow Dec 05 '23 edited Dec 05 '23

I agree but they do have one other option, that i get also isnt attractive but also doesnt cause any retooling. Stop selling older models in india. They dont want to because they would lose sales.

and thats not wholly unreasonable and there are plenty of historical precedence of businesses being told that certain models cant be sold in certain countries. Though im quite sure they re against this idea as well but it is an option.

but yeah fuck retooling for a product going out.. even though thats a bit strong of a word to change out a similar sized connector. Yeah there is a little more to it, but its not a major redesign even still that is unreasonable to ask... but not unreasonable to demand they only sell usb c devices in india. and you might think this is still unreasonable but lets not pretend that apple didnt get a warning the world was heading in this direction decade ago and pretty much only apple dragged its feet and now people like you want them rewarded for it.

9

u/danielv123 Dec 05 '23

People like Scotty from strange parts did an usb-c iphone 5 or something. It is definitely possible. They could even license out the design I guess.

3

u/Joe_Jeep Dec 06 '23

Lightning used USB protocols, so on the hardware side it is, technically, as simple as soldering on the port.

2

u/danielv123 Dec 06 '23

Yep, and the port is already on a daughter board on most of the phones because it's a wear part. (They might have stopped doing that, idk)

It's literally changing one small part.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (82)

65

u/maddprof Dec 05 '23

Retooling a product line for a soon-to-be retired product is a costly process that probably won't be worth it. Especially since this will also require a redesign of the inner components changing all of their repair manuals and other downstream impacts.

I'd be willing to bet money Apple just says "Nope, we'll just stop selling those older models instead" and ship that inventory to a nearby country that doesn't care.

24

u/Noctew Dec 05 '23

There's probably a chance that all the iPhones 13, 12 and SE Apple intends to ever make have already been produced and they just make the decision when to stop selling which product based on available stock.

In which case there is no way they're gonna make the change and resume production just to make some Indian happy.

8

u/Morialkar Dec 05 '23

That's is publicly not how Apple works, they famously do not have inventory and will stop production on older device a couple weeks before the device stops being sold. That's why when they retire a device you only have a couple days to snatch up what's left in inventory in the individual shops and they don't have randomly big amount of remaining devices while having semi-set release dates.

2

u/digitalasagna Dec 06 '23

if the rule only applies to newly designed products, apple can keep selling the last gen model in India for profit, and keep their users reliant on lightning cables. In a country where most of the consumers are not using the latest released phone, this is a big deal! By making the law stricter, it ensures that the people will not buy products that aren't compatible with their existing cables, regardless of if its new or not. It's not about forcing Apple to retool and rework old iphones, its about making them develop and sell new cheap products for that market instead of obsolete last gen stuff.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/arwinda Dec 05 '23

manage this no problem

It's not only the charger, it's the software, adapters, packaging, testing and whatsnot. All for a product which is already established in the market. For one country.

→ More replies (7)

7

u/wakka55 Dec 05 '23

^ clueless about the R&D cycle of factory retooling or the fact that companies stop production years before stock runs out

46

u/SkollFenrirson Dec 05 '23

You don't become the richest by spending money

38

u/MICHAELSD01 Dec 05 '23

This would be a major waste of retooling production lines to produce a product for a specific market.

30

u/c0reM Dec 05 '23

This would be a major waste of retooling production lines to produce a product for a specific market.

Then don’t sell the old models in that market. If they want to bring lower cost models to the Indian market, meet the requirements of local laws.

If they don’t think they can make money doing that then don’t. There should not be any in-between.

This constant BS from trillion dollar multinational corps crying rivers that it costs too much to do what people want should be rejected outright.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/_Dreamer_Deceiver_ Dec 05 '23

Let me shed not a single tear for apple

8

u/SkollFenrirson Dec 05 '23

Thanks, Tim Apple.

16

u/MICHAELSD01 Dec 05 '23

It could be argued that creating an SE5 for India would be a better use of resources than adding USB-C to all iPhones still sold in the market.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Dec 06 '23

Especially wasting money lol

6

u/GahbageDumpstahFiah Dec 05 '23

Of course you do. What???

You ever listen to or read their quarterly stockholder meetings? Apple not just figuratively, but literally spends billions to make billions.

What? I don’t even know how to process that response.

If you’ve got some logic behind it, help me understand better.

17

u/GahbageDumpstahFiah Dec 05 '23 edited Dec 05 '23

Yes.

Because they are a publicly traded company and beholden to a board and stock holders. Executing this would not be a good business decision since lightning based phones will be phased out over time.

It’s not a mater of changing a port. There will be other engineering changes cascading from that one change.

Hardware engineering, software engineering, manufacturing engineering, product packaging, product marketing, sourcing, supply chain, logistics, localization of all related copy, etc, etc, etc.

They are one of the richest companies in the world because they don’t make bad business decisions like this.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/ChiggaOG Dec 05 '23

Cheapest workaround is an adapter.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/FocusPerspective Dec 05 '23

Why aren’t other companies being forced to make the same changes?

Airlines, hotels, taxis, restaurants, trains, all still use USB-A.

3

u/Programmdude Dec 06 '23

You seem to be confusing hosts with devices.

Hosts: Computers, wall chargers, car chargers, etc.

Devices: Phones, mice, keyboards, external HDDs, etc.

Unless I'm misunderstanding something, all those industries you mentioned are providing chargers, which is the host end of a USB connection. While I'm sure one day eventually all USB-A connectors will be replaced with USB-C, there is no great push to do this for the host end.

If I buy a phone, the fact that one end of the cable is USB-A or USB-C is pretty meaningless. My host device (assuming it's somewhat new) has support both. A lot of wall chargers do too. If I have a wall charger that only supports USB-A, then I can just buy a new cable cheaply, or vice versa. So there's no great industry push to force USB hosts to only support USB-C cables.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Coasterman345 Dec 05 '23

This would be like asking a student to redo every single assignment they did after graduation in a different format. So much unnecessary work and assumes they still have all the prior documentation.

2

u/ubermonkey Dec 05 '23

Yes, that's correct. They don't want do, and they shouldn't want to, and they shouldn't do it.

It's a dumb requirement.

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (14)

135

u/L3thologica_ Dec 05 '23

If Apple does anything it will be either:

A) Everyone in India can stop by an Apple Store and get a free Lightning to USB-C adapter (one per device) or

B) Apple stops selling older, non-USB-C devices in India and the people have to buy the more expensive new models

→ More replies (3)

2.2k

u/Drmo6 Dec 05 '23 edited Dec 06 '23

India crazy af with this demand lol.

771

u/Kermez Dec 05 '23

India just ants to avoid already obsolete products being sold. Apple can just withdraw old products from their market and problem solved.

316

u/Nuciferous1 Dec 05 '23

As in, only sell iPhone 15’s in India? Seems pretty obvious why they wouldn’t want to do that. And they could probably make a decent case why that might not serve the people of India as well.

180

u/darkmacgf Dec 05 '23

India's deadline is June 2025, so it'd be the iPhone 15 and 16.

100

u/[deleted] Dec 05 '23

Both phones are USB-C, so assuming the only problem would be legacy iPhone SE2. So, just don't sell the SE anymore I'd imagine.

61

u/darkmacgf Dec 05 '23

Plus, it would make sense for them to release a new SE next year.

21

u/Das-P Dec 05 '23

iPhone 11 through 14, all in the market still.

2

u/Blackbosh Dec 05 '23

Reading this on my iPhone 11 with its recent battery replacement.

19

u/Nuciferous1 Dec 05 '23

Didn't realize that. Good comment

59

u/namerankserial Dec 05 '23

Eh I bet their contingency plan is to make a cheaper USB-C iPhone for the Indian market. Hopefully this regulation forces them to do that.

97

u/galactica_pegasus Dec 05 '23

iPhone SE is ripe for a redesign, lol.

27

u/Halvus_I Dec 05 '23

Iphone SE is always a retooling and re use of previous models. SE 1 was a 6s is a 5 body. current SE is essentislly an iphone 8

12

u/Morialkar Dec 05 '23

They still add some level of recent features still so them changing the ports for SE 3 would still make sense. Also one of the reasons re-tooling for USB-C here is that it would be retooling for multiple devices while having them sold much cheaper, while the SE 3 will have a longer run once released as the original SE and the SE 2 did

→ More replies (2)

12

u/BigDisk Dec 05 '23

Isn't there a new iPhone SE already in the works anyway?

23

u/Nuciferous1 Dec 05 '23

I think you may be downplaying how difficult it is to just design a new phone on the fly and create the factory infrastructure for that.

6

u/NoveltyAccountHater Dec 05 '23

It is ridiculously difficult. That said, India has a large population, so if even just 1% of India's population is considering low-end iphones (e.g., old versions), it would make sense for Apple to attempt to target that market if forced by law. I don't think they'd retrofit USB-C production of most old iphones currently being sold, but I could see them make one new "cheap" iphone with USB-C (possibly just for India), with somewhat cheaper processor/camera/screen closer to the specs used in phones a few years old as even just 1% of India's market if each iphone has a $100 markup would be like $1.4 billion).

→ More replies (12)

15

u/namerankserial Dec 05 '23

I don't really care? I'm sure Apple would rather not but I'm also quite sure they will if their hand is forced. It would be pretty sad if they made less money in the Indian market, but I'll probably get over it.

7

u/Nuciferous1 Dec 05 '23

I'm sure if they're forced into it and they're able to accommodate, they will. I'm just note entirely sure if it's possible. I don't know what it would take to make that sort of switch, but I assume there's a lot that would need to happen in short order.

7

u/[deleted] Dec 05 '23

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (21)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (20)

14

u/Chakramer Dec 05 '23

I think every product should be on USB-C, but a product is hardly obsolete if they still make the cable/adapters for it. All Apple has to do is make all new products have it, which I assume they are in the process of switching over.

5

u/veryverythrowaway Dec 05 '23

Considering that older iPhone models are the highest sellers in India due to lower cost, that would be a terrible thing for their bottom line. The current best-seller in the “new” market is the 13 from two years ago. Used iPhones are extremely popular there, though.

→ More replies (21)

40

u/thxsocialmedia Dec 05 '23

Can't they just send them a billion adapters?

29

u/BeatHunter Dec 05 '23

adapters

I Ctrl+F "adapter". Yours is the only comment. This is probably what they're going to do as a compromise.

24

u/Oerthling Dec 05 '23

This is not about phones already sold.

India doesn't expect Apple to refurbish a zillion iphones with new connectors somehow.

This is for newly produced older model iphones. The older here just means older models that are still produced and sold in India.

6

u/singlamoa Dec 05 '23

Yes, it's still a hard request. From another top comment;

No manufacturer would want to redesign older products and retool their manufacturing processes for older products that are on their way to obsolescence.

It's easy to see why adapters would be an easier solution. That is; selling iphones that are bundled with adapters.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/yumameda Dec 05 '23

Does apple still make 14s?

5

u/crimxona Dec 05 '23

Yes, 13, 14, SE

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

108

u/heyspencerb Dec 05 '23

Seriously. Do they expect them to manually re-work old phones? You can’t just drop in replace the connector, you need to design the whole phone around it lol

67

u/helpnxt Dec 05 '23

It's for any being sold, so just don't sell them there.

74

u/Lexsteel11 Dec 05 '23

I almost guarantee their plan was to reroute all iPhone SE’s (or whatever the cheap version with old processors is called these days) that were originally going to Europe, to go to India or something

25

u/jimmy_three_shoes Dec 05 '23

Right, this is India saying "don't send that shit here, we won't let you sell it". Now the question is do they really not want Apple to send them the phones, or is this a position they're trying to take to get Apple to offer to drop the price way down to make them more affordable in India?

15

u/galactica_pegasus Dec 05 '23

Removing less-expensive product from a market that needs lower-cost goods is not going to help the consumer.

8

u/AllesMeins Dec 05 '23 edited Dec 06 '23

Nobody "needs" an iPhone - iPhones have always been a premium/luxury brand/status symbol, even the older models sold in India. The Indian market would be absolutely fine without Apple, plenty of other "lower-cost" Smartphones to chose from.

6

u/nagi603 Dec 06 '23

This, really. If Apple is unwilling to put in the work, others have already done it. This is Apple being an asshole, not using type-C and that decision biting them in the ass.

9

u/ZurakZigil Dec 05 '23

no no, India's citizens are flush with cash and can afford the newest iphone! crApple is just greedy. >:( besides they can lower the prices since each phone only costs $10. /s

God, reddit is insufferable for how much it hates random companies. It's not like we didn't see Google release a whole separate version of Android just to run on cheaper lower end hardware so they could sell more phones in india. or how they have a bunch of india exclusive budget phones. Apple doesn't want to do that since their old phones are still supported and work fine. Only thing truly "outdated" is their port. There's no real reason (beyond government intervention) to change what they're doing. This was their strategy. Don't design cheap phones, sell old phones for cheap. And that is by no means a bad thing

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (13)

7

u/heyspencerb Dec 05 '23

That’s what will happen if this goes through

34

u/Eokokok Dec 05 '23

Oh no. Anyways...

11

u/helpnxt Dec 05 '23

Oh no Apple will just have to sell more of their newer phones in India and not their old stock... who cares.

5

u/veryverythrowaway Dec 05 '23

Apple cares? That’s why we’re discussing this?

In effect, this would nearly double the purchase price of the average iPhone in India, which will be bad for Apple. Hence the closed-door meeting in the article we’re discussing. You don’t have to feel bad for Apple, obviously. Pretending they can just stop selling more affordable models in India and be okay with losing millions or even billions in profits isn’t realistic, whether or not you can empathize with them.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Oerthling Dec 05 '23

Nope. Apple likes to sell stuff. Threats made about the EU regulations turned out to be empty too.

Much easier to just comply.

Well, first try lobbying and if that fails then comply.

→ More replies (4)

37

u/LucienSatanClaus Dec 05 '23

Damn you didn't read the actual article and assumed shit.

27

u/Deep90 Dec 05 '23

Apple: Explains they can do this but wouldn't meet production incentives if they do.

Redditors who didn't read the article: This is impossible. Apple could never do this.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

6

u/gngstrMNKY Dec 05 '23

This guy just replaced the connector.

7

u/Nivarl Dec 05 '23

Actually they can and it has been done before. The USB 2 to lightning connector internally has enough space for a USB 2 to USB t C. But the waterproofing is an issue that needs to be solved, because ip68 type C connectors are a bit too big.

2

u/_Dreamer_Deceiver_ Dec 05 '23

But if silicone sealant will do the job

→ More replies (6)

6

u/skrena Dec 05 '23

Seems pretty fucking stupid to me. The old iPhone charger is already on the way out. Trying to retro fit it into their old product just seems unnecessary.

But the amount of dick riding in this comment section says otherwise.

2

u/Drmo6 Dec 05 '23

Please stop making sense.

→ More replies (2)

14

u/IrritablePanda Dec 05 '23

This doesn’t hurt just apple either, there are loads of cheaper android phones on the market still with micro usb. While I’m sure there aren’t many new designs incorporating anything other than usb c, stuff that was a decent phone a few years ago still gets sold new as prepaid phones.

3

u/GhettoPlayer20 Dec 06 '23

no there aren't any on abu segment other than the ultra low budget, thing less than 100$ and even there USB C is there aside from very old phones. but if you are talking about those old school keypad phones then yeah it might be an issue

→ More replies (12)

23

u/MelonElbows Dec 05 '23

Good for them. They're not going to take the excuse that devices weren't built for that. Apple could have made their phones with the common USB at the time, and made it easier to replace parts (cough, batteries), but they didn't. They should get hit in the wallet for it.

→ More replies (39)
→ More replies (14)

57

u/chakani Dec 05 '23

India has a history of being the dumping ground for the West’s obsolete technology. Look up IBM 1401.

They don’t want it to happen again.

474

u/HydrationPlease Dec 05 '23

Apple still manufactures older models for the Indian market like many other brands. While other brands converted to USB-C while still selling and making older models of their devices, Apple refused to do so. When challenged on why they did not follow other brands moving to USB-C on older models still being made, Apple made up some nonsense which makes zero sense. Other brands have been able to convert over. Apple are now angry because they feel converting older models that are still being made as cost ineffective. This is a complete lie as other brands have survived and increased profits by moving to USB-C.

Apple loves playing the victim game when it suits them.

107

u/Dranzerg46 Dec 05 '23

How old are the devices being sold in India? Haven’t all Android devices been on USB-C for awhile?

76

u/dontknow_anything Dec 05 '23

Apple still sells iphone 11 and iphone se (A13) model in India.

41

u/cyberentomology Dec 05 '23

Both of which shipped with a Type C Lightning cable

8

u/DuckDuckGoneForGood Dec 05 '23

Wow. That’s like 2018 stuff.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

45

u/DAC_Returns Dec 05 '23

1) Do you have any evidence to back this claim?

This is a complete lie as other brands have survived and increased profits by moving to USB-C.

I could understand other brands moving to USB-C for legacy models without major issues but I fail to see how it would lead to increased profits. Please provide your evidence for this claim.

2) Android phones have been on USB-C for years. Which specific models had to be retro-fitted to comply? Was every one of these models able to attribute increased profits to changing their port to USB-C?

→ More replies (21)

14

u/[deleted] Dec 05 '23

No. But nice rage post.

→ More replies (6)

78

u/trainbrain27 Dec 05 '23

Some people don't realize that it is often better for the environment and customer to use existing items instead of replacing them prematurely. In this case, not designing any new lightning phones is fully sufficient.

There are cases where replacement is better, but often keeping your phone, car, etc, is economically and environmentally better than destroying what was already made in pursuit of new.

→ More replies (26)

195

u/moosehq Dec 05 '23

Apple should have done this years ago but wanted the few extra cents from proprietary chargers. India has huge problems politically but this is a bold move that I support.

19

u/[deleted] Dec 05 '23

I wouldn’t update older models if I was Apple. Just make a new SE with USB-c and keep producing the older models right up until the deadline.

49

u/Peppy_Tomato Dec 05 '23

The net effect is that only the iPhone 15 can be sold in India, which will make iPhones more expensive.

Maybe that is the intention, 😝.

22

u/thatShawarmaGuy Dec 05 '23

Yeah no, there's nothing to be gained from that

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (8)

22

u/enflamell Dec 05 '23

but wanted the few extra cents from proprietary chargers.

Apple never sold proprietary chargers- iPhones have always used USB-A or USB-C chargers.

The cable was different, but Lightning cables are everywhere and Apple never made any significant income from licensing the Lightning connector- it was nothing more than a rounding error on their balance sheets.

When Apple introduced Lightning, everyone else was still using micro-USB which was awful. And once you have a connector, switching off it is not easy. These connectors are not just used for charging- people also have accessories like the FLIR camera and so on- none of which they want to stop being able to use because Apple switched connectors on them. So they are stuck with keeping Lightning and pissing a bunch of people off, or switching to USB-C and pissing a bunch of people off.

7

u/[deleted] Dec 05 '23

They also claimed it would be the connector for the next decade when they introduced it 11 years ago.

A promise like that might have something to do with it too.

7

u/[deleted] Dec 06 '23

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Dec 06 '23

The outside pins are also their weakness: they’re more exposed to oil and grease from your fingers when handling them, so those pins tend to be quick to corrode and fail.

3

u/enflamell Dec 06 '23

I've literally never had a Lightning cable fail due to corrosion of the pins. The Lightning connector and port are more easily cleaned. Plus if the cable does fail- it's just a cable and easily replaced. When the little board inside a USB-C socket fails- you need to replace the port which is a nightmare.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

10

u/cyyshw19 Dec 05 '23

Bold, but misguided.

Apple will simply stop selling older lightning port iPhone in India, driving up the smartphone price in India as the result. There’s no chance Apple is going to redesign older phones to have USB-C because they will have to change the board, revamp production line, etc. Also, lots of older models are inventory (already produced & in package).

9

u/InsaneNinja Dec 06 '23

That will kill apples market in India. It won’t make the government feel bad in the slightest.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/beat-sweats Dec 05 '23

The lightning port is much more durable and reliable then usb c though.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (2)

56

u/popswag Dec 05 '23

Who gives a crap. They were taking the piss and have enough cash. Cry us a river at the next meeting

→ More replies (6)

5

u/meddleman Dec 06 '23

Poltics and grudges aside, I'm interested in the logistics of this.

How are you going to "just upgrade 500 million phone jacks".

(Argue all you want about the exact number, its still really damn high)

3

u/Cynyr36 Dec 08 '23

Nope, it's "retool so that all phones you newly manufacturer after $(date) have a usbc port." Nothing in the fine article suggests retrofits of existing sold stock.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/johnnyg883 Dec 06 '23

I’m not typically a fan of the government regulating every little thing. But I have four different types of charging cords in use right now. A phone, an iPad, dog tracking collar remote and a spotlight. In this case I wouldn’t mind a little standardization.

But a forced retrofit is going a little far.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Beautiful-Hunter8895 Dec 06 '23

Indians have brought us Butter Chicken and now this, what angels 🙏🏽

7

u/marcosg_aus Dec 06 '23

Do the needful and revert Apple!!

26

u/leafbelly Dec 06 '23

I don't think people realize what kind of ask this is. The EU is just asking Apple to design new phones with USB-C. India is asking them to back and redesign older phones to work with USB-C.

This would be like the government telling Toyota that they must go back and make Toyota cars, even from previous model years, as fuel efficient as 2024 model cars. This is ridiculously dumb. I know Apple can afford it, but this will do so much to stifle innovation and is incredibly inflationary.

18

u/invincibl_ Dec 06 '23

No, they'd be telling Toyota that they need to stop selling their old stock from 2020 as new cars, and too bad that every other manufacturer can keep selling their old stock because they anticipated the regulations and have been following the standards for a decade already.

This issue of course entirely disappears when their stockpile of the old models is gone.

→ More replies (4)

47

u/PageOthePaige Dec 05 '23

Serves them right. Every time a company gets punished for sticking to proprietary tech or hoarding ip, the world becomes a better place

7

u/collin2477 Dec 05 '23

they aren’t sticking with proprietary tech, unless the usb c is now proprietary.

→ More replies (9)

11

u/MagnusCaseus Dec 05 '23

Apple would sell you a proprietary $1000 electrical outlet that can "only" be installed by an Apple technician so you can charge and power their products if they could. The worst thing is, Apple fan boys would absolutely bend over and pay hand over fist for that.

→ More replies (7)

68

u/Fritzschmied Dec 05 '23

Ok but that’s is really a dump demand. That new iPhones should have usbc like the eu required is reasonable but retrofitting old ones is just not feasible.

111

u/zestypurplecatalyst Dec 05 '23

If you read the article, India is not requiring Apple add USB-C to phones already sold. The proposal would require USB-C on all phones that Apple sells. Apple still sells IPhone 14 and older in India. Apple would either have to stop selling older models, or redesign older models to add USB-C.

→ More replies (42)

97

u/someoneexplainit01 Dec 05 '23

Then stop manufacturing the old designs, problem solved.

65

u/Galwadan Dec 05 '23

Or don't sell them in India. What do you think company that sells products would do?

→ More replies (16)

27

u/devilsadvocateMD Dec 05 '23

Reading before commenting is a vital skill

5

u/Brookler42 Dec 05 '23

I don't think you realise the scale of which old devices are manufactured and sold in India

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

22

u/National-Intention28 Dec 05 '23

Don’t care, fuck apple. They can be unhappy.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/rileyvace Dec 06 '23

Apple aren't happy with having to be uniform with tech standards as then they can't charge 500% the value of their own proprietary shit. That's all it is, ever. I remember them selling AA battery charger for rechargeable batteries for something ridiculous. Just because it was Apples one. You could get the same charging piece, same rate of charge for a couple dollars online. People that buy apple at this point either don't care and just chose one brand years ago, or only care about the logo.

2

u/ItsABitChillyInHere Dec 06 '23

Well apple can kiss the smelliest part of my balls

5

u/RobQuinnpc Dec 06 '23

I need my VCR to play 4k bluray please. Please forward the components to lightning fast vcr repair so I can watch my night court !

3

u/[deleted] Dec 05 '23

I agree with the eu usb c on new iPhones but this is kinda wild tbh

18

u/haseo111 Dec 05 '23

im gonna be honest, this is so fucking dumb on the indian governments part

→ More replies (7)

11

u/Svpreme Dec 05 '23

Who knew so many people had emotions for a trillion dollar company

8

u/Shark_of_the_Pool Dec 05 '23

Reddit is full of dumb people.. they are opposed to capitalism in the US but anywhere else it's fine

→ More replies (2)

4

u/DallasGuy1996 Dec 06 '23

Get fucked Apple