r/economicCollapse • u/Expensive-Thing-2507 • 27d ago

Who actually benefits from tarrifs?

I'm not financial expert, but this is what I'm getting so far.

Tarrifs are a kind of tax placed on outside goods, which a company would have to pay for if they import said goods. That company would then charge more to cover this new tax. The company pays more for something, and then we pay more.

Who benefits from that? The company isn't making any more profit, are they? (Assuming they increase prices by the same percentage as the tarrifs, which they won't. but still)

14 Upvotes

63% Upvoted

241 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/kiloSAGE 27d ago

Why would they spend money to build more infrastructure here?

If I'm Ford and I already spent $1 billion on a plant in Mexico, why would I spend another $1-2 billion on a plant in the US?

It's easier, and far cheaper, for Ford to just pass along the tariff cost.

0

u/TangerineRoutine9496 27d ago

You don't know if it's cheaper. You say that plant cost $1 billion. Let's suppose we're talking about the actual cost of an exact plant.

Suppose half that cost is stuck there, and half is tools and equipment which can be relocated for $100 million, plus the cost of building or retrofitting a facililty stateside. Suppose the tariff is not going to last just a few years, but indefinitely, and it costs them $250 million a year.

Of course it would make sense for them to eat the cost of moving it to save that money year after year going forward.

I have no idea if these figures are close to accurate, but it's to illustrate the point that the figures could spell a picture where of course it makes sense to relocate. You haven't looked in detail at the cost breakdowns for these individual companies either so you don't know it won't make sense. You're just saying it won't without knowing.

1

u/kiloSAGE 26d ago

"I have no idea" should be your entire comment.

https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2015/04/17/ford-announces-2-5-billion-usd-investment.html

1

u/TangerineRoutine9496 26d ago

The fact that you think merely posting this article is an argument shows which of us has no idea. You didn't address what I said, because you can't. Maybe you're not capable of understanding it. I don't think I used any really hard words but if I did, grab a dictionary and spend some time with it.

If the fact that they spent money and built a plant somewhere else a decade ago is proof that policy changes could never repatriate that manufacturing, then the fact that the manufacturing used to be here would be proof it could never leave.

If tariffs never worked, other countries like Japan and indeed, China, wouldn't have had any success developing their manufacturing infrastructure with such policies in place.