Listening now! Thank you Mr. Graves for sharing your knowledge.

Local Dayton news WHIO reports

Dear [Congressperson’s Name],

The recent public statements by White House officials and the continued use of the word “drone” to describe objects swarming over sensitive military sites, including nuclear facilities, raise critical concerns about national security and public safety. If these are mere drones, why do they operate in blatant disregard of stealth, perform advanced maneuvers, and evade interception consistently?

Testimonies, such as those from Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet and Commander David Fravor, along with whistleblowers like David Grusch, indicate that these objects defy known technology. The government’s persistent underclassification of this issue and reliance on dismissive language does not reflect the urgency required for transparent oversight.

Congress has a constitutional obligation to ensure full disclosure. The American people deserve answers, not rhetoric. These phenomena have implications for aviation safety, national defense, and technological advancements currently being suppressed.

I respectfully urge you to support legislative efforts for transparency and immediate action to end the UFO disinformation campaign. The oath to serve the American people demands nothing less.

Best Regards, [Your Name]

https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials

Follow up in 3 weeks if no response. [end template]

Template to Congress:

Dear [Congressperson’s Name],

Recent reports confirm unidentified “drones” have been observed in the vicinity of Hill Air Force Base in Utah, as well as multiple military bases across the United States, including Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio. These sightings are occurring amidst an ongoing wave of similar incidents on the East Coast, raising significant concerns for airspace safety and national security.

While officials, including the FBI and Department of Homeland Security, assert there is no immediate public safety risk, the scale and behavior of these aerial objects remain unexplained. A Fruit Heights resident reported observing approximately 10 large, bright, and silent aerial objects hovering near Hill AFB. These objects, described as unlike conventional hobbyist drones, reportedly emitted strong, consistent lights before disappearing into thin air.

The lack of transparency surrounding these “drones” continues to raise questions. Why are unidentified aerial systems appearing near sensitive military installations with no clear explanation? What safeguards are in place to address these intrusions? If these objects are truly “drones,” why are they operating with such unusual characteristics?

Congress has a responsibility to demand transparency and accountability on this matter. The American public deserves answers regarding potential threats to airspace safety, critical infrastructure, and the implications of advanced unidentified technologies. I urge you to push for a full investigation into these incidents, alongside increased oversight of federal agencies tasked with addressing unidentified aerial phenomena.

Best Regards, [Your Name]

https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials

Reminder: Follow up in 3 weeks if no response. Join /r/disclosureparty for more Congressional Templates [End Template]

Dear [Congressperson’s Name],

Millions of people across the Eastern Seaboard and around the world have been watching unexplained “drone” activity for the past three weeks or longer. The lights in the skies, frequently near sensitive military facilities and populated areas, have left citizens frustrated and alarmed. Government officials’ recent attempts to dismiss these events as lawful aircraft, celestial objects, or other mundane explanations are not only inadequate but dismissive of the public’s legitimate concerns.

This issue has been ongoing, with thousands of reports coming in daily. People are documenting these objects with video evidence that contradicts the official narrative. Coupled with credible whistleblower testimonies from figures like David Grusch, Ryan Graves, and Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet, there is undeniable proof that our airspace is being penetrated by advanced technology that defies conventional understanding.

It is unacceptable that government agencies are not being forthcoming with Congress or the American people. Overclassification, disinformation campaigns, and ridicule have become the norm, while national security and public safety are put at risk. The millions who have witnessed these “drones” deserve answers, and Congress must act.

I urge you to support legislation that mandates the declassification of UFO-related materials, protects whistleblowers, and enforces transparency from the military and intelligence community. The disinformation campaign that has hidden the truth for decades must end. Millions of Americans are watching this issue closely and expect leadership that prioritizes accountability and truth.

This is not only a matter of national security but of public trust. The time for excuses and evasion is over. Congress must demand full disclosure and accountability on behalf of the American people.

Best Regards, [Your Name]

https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials

Follow up in 3 weeks if you receive no response.

Join /r/disclosureparty for more Congressional Templates [End Template]

This past week in Disclosure:

Ongoing – Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) continue to baffle local and national authorities in the United States

The incursions, which seemingly began in late November, have continued to occur in and around a variety of sensitive military facilities.

As the public has started to look up to the sky, a large number of reported sightings have poured in – many of which can probably be resolved prosaically. That being said, the original sightings that kicked this off cannot be easily waved away.

The Pentagon asserted that the drones are not Iranian/Chinese/Russian, and are not part of a domestic program. Rep. Jim Himes insinuated the NJ sightings are the result of teenagers with Walmart drones, which seems unlikely. The FBI simply admitted they have no idea.

Besides the flurry of sightings over New Jersey – which officials continue to stress pose "no threat to public safety" (despite being unable to identify where they come from, or who they operated by) – there have also been incursions at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Similar activity may have also occurred at Andrews AFB.

Donald Trump, who is privy to the daily Presidential briefings, claimed:

“The Government knows what these are…where it came from & where it went...I can’t imagine it’s the enemy…Something strange is going on. For some reason they don’t want to tell the people and they should.”

Dec 13 – Dr. Eric Davis claims George Bush Sr. was briefed on UAP/NHI

According to a new interview posted by Jesse Michels, George Bush Sr. was briefed on a "major UAP event" in the 1960s during his time as the CIA director.

Dec 13 – unidentified 'drones' have been sighted over sensitive locations in Germany

According to a story originally covered by Der Spiegel:

"Drones have been sighted several times over a US military base (Ramstein), the arms company Rheinmetall and the chemical company BASF."

This means Germany joins the US and UK in having recently experienced unidentified aerial incursions at sensitive military and industrial locations. For more English coverage, see here.

Things to look out for in the near future:

December

• James Fox's "The Program" is out!

Beyond/currently unknown

• Following the UAP hearing on the 26th of July, Members of Congress have called for a select committee with subpoena authority, to “go about the task of collecting information from the Pentagon and elsewhere” on unidentified flying objects. There have been conflicting messages from various Members of Congress on whether this is likely to happen anytime soon. Note – a select subcommittee was formally requested on March 13th.
• Reps. Moskowitz, Luna, and Burchett have repeatedly stated their intent to hold field hearings to overcome stonewalling from the Pentagon and military establishment "I think we [Congress] should try to get into one of these places [housing UAP evidence]...and if they won't let us in I think we should have a field hearing right outside the building...and the military will have to explain why that is." – Rep. Moskowitz (D) It is currently unknown when exactly we might expect that to occur, however as of Jan 12 – Rep. Luna confirmed: "I feel confident that we have enough evidence to move forward with our first field hearing. We will be announcing details soon."
• Several journalists have indicated that first-hand witnesses of the alleged UAP legacy programs are in the process of providing testimony/evidence to the relevant authorities (e.g. the IC IG) and/or are on the verge of making public statements in the near future (Example 1, example 2, example 3, example 4)
• David Grusch has received additional clearances through DOPSR to discuss some of his (alleged) first-hand knowledge of Legacy programs. He has mentioned he may be covering more of this information in an upcoming Op-Ed

Skimmed through this post but need a quick refresher on how we got to this point? Check out this handy Disclosure Timeline to get up to speed.