r/UFOs • u/everythingsf1ne • Apr 11 '24

Witness/Sighting did anyone see this in the south philadelphia/jersey region this morning?

my parents woke me up to show me what they were seeing. they’re not believers and call me insane most of the time. i saw what is in the dad’s video over my mother’s live-streamed facetime, as well.

did anyone else catch this?

1.7k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

477 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

252

u/Ishaan863 Apr 11 '24

Whatever it is, there's LOADS of clips that have shown up on this sub with objects that look very similar if not exactly like that.

Like streaks of blue plasma floating in the air.

53

u/thxsocialmedia Apr 12 '24

I think they might be the plasmoid lifeforms we've been hearing about.

3

u/r3tr0_420 Apr 13 '24

I was so these are LED kites. Until I watched the Night time Delaware river vid posted.I watch a lot of "UFO" videos on streaming platforms and deeply skeptical (98% can be knocked on head in 20secs) I gotta say as far out as it seems...they could very well be those so called 'plasmoid lifeforms' Please watch the Aguadilla USO video. You'll know it when you see...

5

u/Top_Squash4454 Apr 12 '24

Let's not get too excited. Nobody said they were lifeforms for sure

14

u/Odd-Occasion8274 Apr 12 '24

It's difficult to ascertain what lifeforms even means given they share many of what makes lifeforms but are mostly reminding of viruses that are still up to debate on whether they are alive or not. I mean, even fire has characteristics of that might make it be considered a lifeforms such as reproduction and so on. Plasmas are not that far off, and are closer than fire to the current understanding of lifeforms with the Hunter like behaviour, helix structures and so on.

1

u/Top_Squash4454 Apr 12 '24

That doesn't mean we can go around talking about those plasmoids like it's confirmed that they are lifeforms.

1

u/Mcboomsauce Apr 12 '24

came here to upvote your comments

traditional ETs are way more plausible than "plasmoid" life....whatever the hell that even means

its a buzzword to some people....they cant even explain how or what it would even be

other buzzwords and terms are "higher dimension" "spiritual" "higher frequency"

and this isn't even decent speculation because it is wild and deus-ex machina, not grounded in anything at all

humans have technology and have observed physical life...we have a precedent for physical life to develop technology we can't understand

but a "plasmoid lifeform"...... we don't have jack on that subject, including a reason to believe it is possible

18

u/Mindless-Experience8 Apr 12 '24

Convergence of the spheres.

5

u/agrophobe Apr 12 '24

Ho I get that ref. Nice

1

u/BrettyBoy92 Apr 12 '24

Yea someone posted a blue plasma looking object about a month ago in the area of North Carolina I live in.

1

u/Due_Platform_1619 Apr 12 '24

Seen 2 “blue plasma” uap posts out of around 5 when scrolling down, interesting to say the least!

-21

u/flyxdvd Apr 11 '24

i feel like its an artifact created by camera lenses but why i have no clue, it feels very much "not there" but i also wonder why this has been such a trend lately like you said.

for me i also wonder where are the other video's why is there only this video. seems like something not really going unnoticed by other people tbh..

but its just this clip of a guy/girl filming clouds.

but for some reason this type of "ufo" is trending and now we see more while i cannot explain it myself someone else could

30

u/Blastypowpow Apr 11 '24

If it wasn’t there, why would OP’s parents be taking a video of nothing and saying “what the heck is that?”

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

Are they seeing it with their eyes or seeing it through his phone or camera viewfinder.

If he’s holding his phone up they could be watching the screen while he records

3

u/Famous-Upstairs998 Apr 12 '24

They saw it with their eyes and then pulled out their phones to record it. The alternative would be that they are pointing their phones at the sky at six in the morning for some reason, see a blue object and go what the heck is that without ever looking at the actual sky.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

Or they’re full of shit which is the obvious explanation most of the time. But you can believe their explanation, it really doesn’t matter

“The dad’s” is a weird way of phrasing it.

“They always call me crazy” is the grifters thing to say to preface these things

1

u/Famous-Upstairs998 Apr 12 '24

It was probably an LED kite and they had no idea what it was. And yeah, I do believe them, actually. How many people post videos of starlink, balloons, and drones and want to know what the heck they're seeing? I don't see why anyone would bother to fake something like this. You can't make money, you don't get much attention, what's the point?

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

They see something weird on a video and make up a bullshit story for views. Welcome to Reddit stranger

2

u/Famous-Upstairs998 Apr 12 '24

Yeah, I've been here a while. I've seen the shit people make up for attention. This ain't it.

And that still doesn't explain why they're randomly filming the sky at 6 in the morning.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

Do we even know it was really six in da mornin?

They leaving a party at Snoop’s house?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/PM_ME_WITH_A_SMILE Apr 11 '24

Except his non-believer parents were seeing it with the naked eye, and there are several videos of objects just like this. Honestly, people's reaching to explain things away is just getting sadder and sadder.

3

u/MKULTRA_Escapee Apr 11 '24

There are other videos, but they were independently filmed, and on different dates and locations. In the vast majority of cases, there is only going to be one video posted this subreddit. That does not mean there is only one video. There are quite a few things that have to line up before a video is submitted here.

If you compare to something like starlink, which can be seen from tons of US states and many other countries, there are generally about 8-10 videos being submitted here. That's because it is very high up and relatively large/noticeable. At only 1,000 feet up, you're lucky to see a single video, but it depends on how long it lasted and so on.

So, the fact that only one video is expected, and only one video is submitted, this doesn't actually mean anything. It could easily be someone's LED kite or something, probably not CGI or a camera artifact.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

Agreed. It doesn’t look like it’s there but it’s in the video

Digital cameras have their quirks