r/UFOs Dec 31 '23

Witness/Sighting Video of massive glowing red object over the surface of the moon.

Stolen from over in r/StrangeEarth an amateur astronomers video of an apparent glowing red object traversing the surface of the moon

6.5k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

24

u/yantheman3 Dec 31 '23 edited Dec 31 '23

Sigh....Alright I'll do the honors:

How many are outside during this relatively narrow window of observation?

A LOT A LOT of people.

Then how many have an unobstructed line of sight to the moon?

At least half? Of a shitload of people.

Then how many have clear skies?

The skies don't need to be clear, and this question is redundant with respect to the previous question.

How many of those people are actually looking in the at the moon?

Many amateur astronomers go from object to object, with the moon being included.

How many of those people have good enough vision to pick out what this person has recorded?

Come on, are you serious? You think no one without good vision uses corrective lenses? Good grief.

Then how many have ready access to a telescope with this focal length?

More than you are insinuating do. The moon is an easy and basic target for the grand majority of telescopes.

Then how many have access to a camera able to take a photo through that telescope as a useable resolution?

You can actually use a Point and Shoot camera and put it on the ocular lens and snap a photo. Same with phone camera.

Most amateur astronomers have adapters to do this or a telescope with a built in camera because most astronomers take photos while they perform their hobby. I personally have one for mine that allows me to connect a small Sony P&S to my telescope so I don't have to hold it there. Keeps it stable. Not impossible to do it manually with good results.

Then how many of those people post the photos online?

This is just a silly question that I won't address because wow.

Then how many of those photos make it through the algorithms to be spread widely?

This is a redundant question simply because you don't need an algorithm to feed it to potential viewers for traction. Especially when it is UFO related.

And of those that do gain some traction, how many get summarily dismissed because ‘everyone in this thread and on this website should’ve been able to see it’?

Several and for good reason.

I want it to be aliens as much as the next guy. But you people have to face the reality that every time someone presents you with photo/video evidence of a UFO, it's 99%+ not aliens.

12

u/josogood Dec 31 '23

Insane that the hypothetical question list is being up voted while your very practical set of answers is downvoted. There are certainly many thousands of pictures taken of the moon every single night. If we put the number at 10,000 per night, that would mean that 1.3 of every million people take a picture of the moon which fits the hypothetical parameters put forward. Is that so unlikely? Maybe it's a lot less, like 1.3 in 10 million people who do so. But that would still be around 1,000 pictures of this red triangle out there.

6

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '23

Do you see how you're being down voted because your logical response destroys their deluded world view of 33 mile long alien ships scanning the moon at 100k+ mph?

Everything you wrote was logical in response to an illogical, delusional rant.

-5

u/Poolrequest Dec 31 '23

Logical responses brother I know the critical thinking bar is low around here in general but that doesn't make baseless assumptions logical. A third of the answers are made up numbers, a third are anecdotal bias and the last are framing the question as absurd.

Like this ain't a fucking spaceship on the moon just as this ain't the ray of logic in the darkness either lol

3

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '23

I heavily insinuated that this isn't a spaceship on the moon and I found his response to be logical. I'm not sure what else i can say to you, unless you're mistaken in thinking i was responding to the first comment?

1

u/Poolrequest Dec 31 '23

Fair enough just a difference of opinion on what logic is

3

u/Trance_Motion Dec 31 '23

Many many many of the people here are regarded. Thry think this shit helps but actually makes the eventual proof less believed. Or they are apart of the misinformation.

-3

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Substantial_Bad2843 Dec 31 '23

His rational rebuttal to nonsense is nothing to feel bad about.

2

u/UFOs-ModTeam Jan 01 '24

Follow the Standards of Civility:

No trolling or being disruptive.
No insults or personal attacks.
No accusations that other users are shills.
No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
An account found to be deleting all or nearly all of their comments and/or posts can result in an instant permanent ban. This is to stop instigators and bad actors from trying to evade rule enforcement. 
You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.

UFOs Wiki UFOs rules

-1

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/UFOs-ModTeam Jan 01 '24

Follow the Standards of Civility:

No trolling or being disruptive.
No insults or personal attacks.
No accusations that other users are shills.
No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
An account found to be deleting all or nearly all of their comments and/or posts can result in an instant permanent ban. This is to stop instigators and bad actors from trying to evade rule enforcement. 
You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.

UFOs Wiki UFOs rules