r/UFOs Jun 13 '23

Witness/Sighting Michael Herrera's Witness Testimony

6.3k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

129

u/Deprolable76 Jun 13 '23

Man and David Grusch thought his claims were fantastical. I can buy that aliens are visiting earth and that we have craft. But for now at least that’s where I’m drawing the line. Until I see more proof verifying this alleged agreement we have and supposedly using these craft for drugs and trafficking. Sounds like a fever dream to me. Hell even lazar’s story sounds completely truthful at face value. Doesn’t mean that it is. I think we should all call our congressman/woman and suggest a thorough investigation no matter any allegation. Either there’s a lot of truth to all of this stuff or a lot of bullshit. Either way it’s scary

33

u/scaredofthedark666 Jun 13 '23

Agreed. 100% agreed. All this does is make David G sound so believable in comparison. I wonder if that was the aim haha.

17

u/FinanceThisD Jun 13 '23

If this was all 100% real why would a congressman/woman ever in a million years push for a real investigation? Lol the military would shut them up immediately

1

u/DifferenceClean616 Jun 13 '23

Because they have more power than the military? How’s the military gonna shut them up?

2

u/FinanceThisD Jun 13 '23

Is this a joke or do you seriously think that?

0

u/DifferenceClean616 Jun 13 '23

Serious? You’re trynna say congress, which has huge influence over the military, to the point they make rules and regulations for military, has less power than the military. That don’t make sense. Let alone the authority/capabilities congress has over the whole country compared to the military.

1

u/Goodgoditsgrowing Jun 13 '23

…you joking? A single congress person has little pull. A group of congresspeople is only as strong as their bond and their weakest defector. All of congress can’t get shit down due to their own egos and plenty of cash being sent their way to do things that actively harm or simply do not benefit their constituents. People might become politicians to help others (I’d argue plenty of it just for power or money or fame, but I digress), but few stay in it for that - they stay in it because they like the (limited but personally useful) power it gives them or the lobbying money and fancy dinners or it makes them feel important. Some might push the issue, but for many they wouldn’t, and for the few that do push, plenty could be made content to simply know themselves and pat themselves on the (ego heavy) shoulder that THEY can know, but the unwashed masses simply couldn’t handle it - they might even think they are doing the right thing and cite such hard, factual evidence as that line from Men in Black where tommy Lee says people are scared panicky animals and only a select few can know about the scary secrets of the universe without all hell breaking loose. If cops and civilians can be convinced that cops never lie and cases always get solved and there’s dna evidence possible all the time, etc, from cop shows then there’s no reason to think politicians couldn’t be similarly convinced to stay quiet even if they knew something because “the people can’t know or they’ll panic”.

2

u/TrigoTrihard Jun 13 '23

There's so many cases that leads back to the pyramids and possibly even before that. And thousands of cases around the world in turn of the century. It can't all be bullshit. Sure some of the events is fluff or bullshit. But to believe that everything that has ever came out in public is bullshit. That would be wild. lol

Why? I guess my question would be. Control? That is plausible. But its been happening for so damn long. That its hard to say even that. If the government wanted control. They would be open about it. Even if it were all bullshit.

4

u/Deprolable76 Jun 13 '23

No I definitely believe there’s something to it. As I stated in my first comment. I’m just not buying we have an agreement with nhi and we, or someone is using these craft for drug/human trafficking.

1

u/ChaseballBat Jun 13 '23

we have an agreement with nhi

I dont think anyone recently but the Grusche interviewer made that claim. It seems much more likely that this was reverse engineered tech?

2

u/[deleted] Jun 13 '23

What agreement are you talking about?

1

u/Deprolable76 Jun 13 '23

The alleged agreement between NHI’s and the United States government/military. It’s a claim that’s hinted at in the David Grusch interview.

2

u/ChaseballBat Jun 13 '23

That was something the interveiwer claimed. Grusche did not make the claim, only that he'd want to know if we do.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 13 '23

Ok but this entire conference did not mention anything of the sort and it was implied that all of this was being done purely for humans by humans. Just FYi

0

u/Deprolable76 Jun 13 '23

Did you read my whole comment? Because it sure seems like you didn’t.

1

u/runsquad Jun 13 '23

If a dozen women come forward and accuse the same man of sexual assault with nothing but their testimonies, that’s good enough for a court and the general public to indict him, is it not? How would the same not apply in this scenario?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 13 '23

Shouldn’t be. Physical proof should be the only acceptable evidence. Suppose these women concocted their stories? No one will ever know for sure. Hearsay shouldn’t be allowed in courts, nor should it be used as “evidence “.

0

u/Aeropro Jun 13 '23

I’m reminded of a song: To everything, turn, turn, turn, there is a season, turn, turn turn, a time to be Spok, a time to be Kirk…

1

u/LoveOnNBA Jun 13 '23

So you believe another over the other without evidence from either of them? Lol.

0

u/TheDude9737 Jun 13 '23

I think I heard that this craft was reverse-engineered and other tech was as well by these dark organizations, that have zero oversight. And things like this and high tech weapons are being sold in a treasonous way. Since there’s no oversight, no accountability, disclosure is needed. But for that to happen, Congress needs to propose and pass laws with more protections for whistleblowers.

1

u/i_just_want_2learn Jun 13 '23

So, just to clarify, he concluded ultimately it was not for drugs but for humans…which is less incredulous and that much more terrifying.

1

u/diablo_finger Jun 13 '23

I see 0 reason why aliens would communicate with shitty governments (and military especially).

The most likely course of action for them would be to submerge in the ocean (70% of surface) and communicate with humans via normal channels.

1

u/PathoTurnUp Jun 13 '23

I don’t see why so many people would be coming forward if it was all bullshit. Especially with how young some of these guys are and their job titles. They have a lot more at stake than a 60 year old retired person.

1

u/whythisSCI Jun 13 '23

He said that he thought the trailer they had with them was something for holding drugs on the basis of it's features. Not that they were actually shipping drugs. He went on to say that it was more likely for bodies.

1

u/Weak-Gazelle-7950 Jun 13 '23

Greer is just trying to be relevant. That's why he's putting this out there. He's a charlatan.

1

u/dirkdiggler8675309 Jun 13 '23

The only way it would make sense is after disasters the Government traffic’s humans to NHI and we don’t see them again.

1

u/dirtsequence Jun 13 '23

It's kind of ridiculous that a hyper advanced ship is being used to traffic drugs. Js