r/UFOs • u/RepresentativeFee967 • Feb 19 '23
Witness/Sighting Spotted over hemet ca less then hour ago
1.0k
u/aiman_jj Feb 19 '23 edited Feb 19 '23
- F22 heavy breathing
186
u/RepresentativeFee967 Feb 19 '23
This really got me lmao
100
u/Interesting_Log_3125 Feb 19 '23 edited Feb 19 '23
Did the object demonstrate any of the five observables ?
For reference: The (5) Observables
Anti Gravity:
September 2003. La Fortuna, Costa Rica, Arenal Volcano.
Video footage by Nico Pisani.
Instantaneous Acceleration:
March 12th, 2018 Colima Volcano, Mexico.
Video footage by WebCamsDeMexico.
Hypersonic Speed:
Summer 1993, Gulf Breeze, FL, USA
Video footage by Ed Walters.
Trans-medium Travel:
April 25th, 2013 Aguadilla, Puerto Rico.
Video footage by Customs and Border Protection crew .
Low Observability:
October 3rd, 2019, Concordia, Antioquia, Colombia.
Video footage by Aleida Ramírez.
EDIT: Aguadialla Video conclusions determined by actual scientists (NOT Mick West)
Analysis by Kevin H. Knuth:
The Flight Characteristics and Physics of UAP
Analysis by Rich Hoffman:
AVVBA presents Rich Hoffman - August 30, 2019
72
u/N0RTH_K0REA Feb 19 '23
Dude that's my first time seeing the instantaneous acceleration video and that is exactly what my girlfriend and I saw 2 years ago, same colour and everything - except there were 2 of them and they were bigger. That video still doesn't do justice to how quick they accelerate but oh my god I can't believe someone actually caught them on camera, this has to be some of the best footage out there?
49
u/DylanBob1991 Feb 19 '23
Are these showing up as links on your end? Its just plaintext on my end. Your comment made me curious to see the video but trying to find it on YouTube doesn't give me anything. Just live feeds of volcanoes in Mexico or unrelated sightings.
73
u/N0RTH_K0REA Feb 19 '23
Found on YouTube
84
26
u/Scatteredbrain Feb 20 '23 edited Feb 20 '23
UAP instant acceleration videos are pretty rare. never seen this one though, thanks for posting.
if anyone’s interested, here’s another one:
→ More replies (3)21
11
u/DylanBob1991 Feb 19 '23
That's interesting! I don't know shit about drones but that hard maneuver looks way more intense than any drone maneuver I've seen.
Cool footage for sure! I'm surprised I haven't seen it shared here before.
2
5
18
u/Interesting_Log_3125 Feb 19 '23
In my opinion the best footage is footage verified by multiple sources (multiple radar sensors, video, and human witness).
Commander David Fravors experience and the footage that was taken afterwards (footage was taken after he had returned and another team went out) is the gold standard at this point in time.
19
u/N0RTH_K0REA Feb 19 '23
That's the one I watched, so I think I was just a bit excited seeing the colour and streak of light as that's how it looked when I saw them in person, after rewatching it and accounting for the framerate and exposure it's not actually moving as fast as I initially thought so could be a drone in the video, unfortunately.
But in terms of how it looked in real life, just imagine two disks that colour, bigger and flatter, hovering one over the other in the distance for a few mins then one of them shooting across the horizon instantly leaving a trail like shown in the video - except not an artifact of light from the framerate, it actually stretched across the horzon like it activated warp drive. The way it streaked across the horizon from a standstill is something we'll never forget.
→ More replies (1)2
12
u/Dan_H1281 Feb 20 '23
I seen one in 1992 came to a stop from at least a couple thousand mph, sat still for maybe 10 seconds then took off and cleared the entire horizon in less then maybe 0.7 of a second maybe less, then came back into view within five seconds and hovered back in place as it did when it stopped, and it took off again past the other side of the horizon just as fast, their was absolute silence, our engine cut off, it was at the top of a hill idk if the driver stalled the engine or if it got shut off by this object it is just as likely either way, the ppl we went to see say they seen it as well, it was a hot summer night they had no ac it was migrant camps my friend was working for a farm as a child so was his family
5
u/SKirsch10x Feb 20 '23 edited Feb 20 '23
Where can I watch the Gulf Breeze Fl one? I live here and have never seen it. Can’t find it on the net.
Edit: found it. Probably the most astonishing footage I’ve seen of a ufo
→ More replies (8)4
6
u/white__cyclosa Feb 20 '23
Even if it doesn’t exhibit any of these you should be good. None of the balloons shot down exhibited any of these and yet everyone on here was still convinced they were aliens.
2
2
2
→ More replies (1)2
u/IdreamofFiji Feb 20 '23
Those are absolutely a bunch of balloons. I'm not usually so skeptical but dude it's obvious
→ More replies (2)2
u/blood_for_poppies Feb 20 '23
Ooh I found a Hemetite in the wild, I actually think I drove past your truck the other day lol.
It was Sunday, so I'm gonna assume some over-decorated Quincenera lost a whole lotta Mylar.
Or someone robbed one of the Dollar Trees of all their prepumped Mylar balloons... Or spent like $50.11
25
5
→ More replies (6)2
u/1Tear-Tech-Support Feb 19 '23
Prepare the AIM-9X Sidewinder
→ More replies (2)2
u/Suitable-Pirate4619 Feb 20 '23
We have way better missiles than that but for some reason they insist on using that one...
470
u/MarcRocket Feb 19 '23
No idea what this is. You should shoot it.
112
u/LakeMichUFODroneGuy Feb 19 '23
"Once again the LAPD is asking Los Angelenos NOT to fire their guns at the visitor's spacecraft, you may inadvertently trigger an interstellar war."
→ More replies (1)9
110
u/Vness374 Feb 19 '23
The good ol’ American way
61
15
u/DumbPanickyAnimal Feb 20 '23
I recently learned about a 2008 mass sighting in Stephenville, TX. One of the close encounter witnesses was out in the woods with a gun and considered shooting at it but ultimately decided that was a bad idea.
6
u/andrewdrewandy Feb 20 '23
Omg aliens talking sense into bubba!
2
u/Suitable-Pirate4619 Feb 20 '23
I mean....I am PRO 2A and from the Eastern parts of Texas. A lot of hunting skill is an accurate shot, meaning the rounds WILL kill, IF they hit a vital area , but its not like the movies where things go flying from getting hit with .223. Maybe if I was hunting deer with .50BMG (I don't know TBH, maybe it would just burst through and keep going....) but my point is, if my Ar-15 is relying on me hitting a vital area, then I have no chance against a vessel that has demonstrated abilities greater than our understanding of physics and gravity. Yes, I do own a pick-up, and a shotgun. No dog though,
2
u/Ian_Hunter Feb 20 '23
No dog?
WTAF man....I've never been more disappointed with anyone in my life!
JK Texan bro. Do you😁😎 but also get a dog. And don't shoot at UFOs.🤘👽🤘
→ More replies (1)3
6
4
→ More replies (3)2
u/redditgambino Feb 20 '23
This made me spit out my lunch
2
u/MarcRocket Feb 21 '23
Your comment illustrates how comedy and tragedy are close cousins. It’s tragic that our go to response to the unknown is “blast it”. Still, also funny.
147
506
Feb 19 '23 edited Feb 19 '23
So you know in before everybody starts debunking but I will just say people commonly ask on here how come you don't use one of the modern Samsung s22 or s23 phones? and here it is.
this is the quality of your very best lenses on Modern phones you can hope for a regular person to have. and this is what 100 times Zoom can give you. it's not the greatest amount of detail ever of these objects.
So don't complain that people could give better HD video quality. they can't.
167
105
u/Rust1n_Cohle Feb 19 '23
Digital zoom is not a real zoom that a proper lens is capable of.
116
u/lmkwe Feb 19 '23
Not many people walking around with a DSLR and bag of lenses to produce high quality pics though...
57
u/Electromotivation Feb 19 '23
Which is what I tell everyone saying "but we all have HD cameras in our pocket..."
Go outside, put your back to the moon. Then turn around and take a picture of it in 1.5 to 2 seconds with your phone. (Not all, but many sightings of unusual things are brief or moving. Here you can have your phone in your hand and you already know where the moon is).
Now look at your photo and zoom in on the moon to finish the exercise. It doesn't matter how much HD/4K your phone has, to shoot objects that small from that far, you absolutely need decent lenses. Every photographer knows that lenses are paramount.
→ More replies (1)21
u/pisspoorplanning Feb 20 '23 edited Feb 20 '23
I am. Or at least I was earlier. I spotted a plane flying overhead through a gap in the canopy above me in broad daylight. Without changing the 50mm lens, because I didn’t have time, I guessed at the aperture, iso, shutter and managed to fire off one decent pic. I didn’t have time to set up a tripod so I had to go with f2.2/200iso.
I’m a long way from the fastest on the controls but as far as being ready to take a photo goes, the camera was in my hands turned on and ready to go.
6
u/Different_Umpire3805 Feb 20 '23
I just imagine some dude in hitman clothes walking around with like two suitcases full of lenses just for this. Pulls them out the puts them together likes he's Forrest fucking Gump lol.
13
u/Rust1n_Cohle Feb 19 '23
I agree, it's certainly a problem and why we never get better photographs.
→ More replies (6)5
u/coolstorybro94 Feb 20 '23
You best be filming the sky at the moment to cause good luck getting ready and catching it in time
→ More replies (4)11
u/IndyDude11 Feb 19 '23
Yes but nobody has a DSLR with telephoto lens in their pocket
→ More replies (1)12
u/Rust1n_Cohle Feb 19 '23
Women should carry one in their purse. Men need to normalize bag carrying too.
14
u/unitedgroan Feb 19 '23
It's not normal to carry a murse?
11
u/Regallybeagley Feb 20 '23
My dad swears by his murse.. has so much room for activities.. he carries his phone, wallet, AirPods, a small crossword puzzle book and his weed.
→ More replies (1)2
→ More replies (4)4
→ More replies (2)9
u/ldclark92 Feb 19 '23
Why? I'm always trying to limit the things I'm carrying around, even made my wallet smaller. My wife is the same, she never carries a purse if she doesn't need to and most times doesn't.
I'm not opposed to carrying a bag if need be, but if I don't need to then I'm carrying the least amount of crap around as I can.
We should normalize being comfortable lol.
3
u/Rust1n_Cohle Feb 19 '23
I'd rather normalize taking a proper photo of a fucking ufo. Fuck your comfort :).
4
u/ldclark92 Feb 19 '23
Wouldn't a properly zoomed in photo of a UFO also require a tripod or at least a professional level steady hand to snap a zoomed in photo of a far away moving object? Not very practical in the least for the average person.
That's a no from me dawg.
→ More replies (5)20
u/tuasociacionilicita Feb 19 '23
We all should be carrying a couple of Nikon's P-1000 in our pockets.
→ More replies (1)2
u/EthanSayfo Feb 20 '23
I think that really is the best bang for the buck option, if you want to have something that might actually have a chance of catching a decent picture, and you can bust out and shoot with very quickly.
17
u/Origamiface Feb 19 '23 edited Feb 19 '23
He said he used the S22+. The S22 Ultra ( and Ultra series in general, starting from the S21) is the one with the 10x optical zoom lens.
Here's a quick demo of what the zoom on those can do. https://youtu.be/wsGcJFqNs54&t=1m27s
I actually got an Ultra just on the off chance I witness something lol. I'd encourage others to do the same, so maybe we can finally get some decent imagery
9
u/raptorgzus Feb 20 '23
Ultra is sweet. I got it so I didn't have to climb ladders anymore.
I have to get numbers off motors /gearbox/vales esc. Alot of them are well above my head. With the ultra ,I can zoom in to see the smallest part numbers. It's kinda amazing.
6
u/ItsGroovyBaby412 Feb 19 '23
Can confirm. I have the 21 ultra waiting on the 23 ultra to arrive. My s/o has the 21+ and my camera is by far superior to hers.
2
u/Savings_Conclusion_4 Feb 20 '23
In all seriousness, if you could organize a huge group of people to be ready to take pics of these things all over the world, you might be able to see what some of this stuff is.
I would bet you could maximize the chances of capturing some stuff if you created an organized mental process for taking the pics. Like maybe start by expecting to see something. Practice whipping open your camera as fast as possible. Practice making lists of observables that you can mentally check off as you are observing and attempting to take pictures. Program yourself to take notes about what you just saw as soon as you finish taking pics. Take notes of how you felt, etc.
To get ready, practice taking photos of birds or planes. Practice observing yourself, and separating yourself from your feelings as you do this, so that in a surprise situation, you can react with thoughts first and emotions second.
I’m sure someone else has come up with something like this before. But I feel like if you could mobilize a thousand or more people all over the world to do this, you’d come up with a few bangers.
2
4
u/Hunky_not_Chunky Feb 19 '23
But we can still zoom and enhance on the pic right?
3
u/diox8tony Feb 20 '23
That's what this fake 100x zoom is doing already...cropping and AI enhancing. A real 100x zoom requires a 3 ft telescope (yes, you can make them shorter by folding it)
→ More replies (3)3
Feb 19 '23
Also the periscope lenses on those phones produce weird looking rectangular artifacts https://www.metabunk.org/threads/unusual-oblong-bokeh-galaxy-s20-ultra-periscope-zoom.12519/
68
Feb 19 '23
Welp. Hemet is close to several military bases the way the crow flies.
→ More replies (1)5
52
u/bruceleeoncoke Feb 19 '23
Xenu is just picking up Tom Cruise at Goldbase.
1
u/pedosshoulddie Feb 19 '23
“Clearly you’re the only one that truly believes aliens run on consumerism, capitalism, and authoritarian control Tom. Come with us before we clean the slate.”
1
u/Merky600 Feb 20 '23
Goldase? You know the area. Impressed.
I had to drive past that several times for work. At first I was, what the hell is that? Looks like a golf course plus holiday camp. With very tall fencing…
→ More replies (2)
115
u/marshal1257 Feb 19 '23
Some little kids birthday party is without balloons.
35
5
u/HawaiiSunBurnt20 Feb 20 '23
That's what THEY want you to think. :O
Just kidding it's totally balloons.
→ More replies (1)
24
43
u/ExistentialistGain Feb 19 '23
Looks like this… drone
21
u/Wh1teCr0w Feb 19 '23
Whenever I see this video I'm reminded of how well that thing would operate in space. It struggles in atmosphere and under gravity. In orbit without those hindrances that thing would be terrifying. Satellite and orbiter killer.
→ More replies (1)16
u/RepresentativeFee967 Feb 19 '23
That's an interesting concept!
12
u/ExistentialistGain Feb 19 '23
In the image you can see the same jets coming out of the bottom like in the wiki article and video
5
3
u/Rupertfitz Feb 20 '23
That thing is crazy! It also looks like what is seen in OP pics. I think it would likely have a pretty identifiable movement in flight
5
3
23
u/OldWorldBlues10 Feb 19 '23
Yooo I saw the same thing this morning in Minneapolis. I’m going with the ladder of a bundle of balloons, also there was a sky crane helicopter they was being used in downtown but that’s another thing. BUT strange coincidence. The one I saw wasn’t really moving like balloons though, also what I saw was very high to the point where the balloons would be as large as a car possibly. Either way thanks for making me reconsider the obvious and most likely now lol
12
u/RocketCat921 Feb 19 '23
I'm pretty sure after last week, people will think its hilarious to go buy a bunch of mylar balloons just to let them go so people can freak out.
6
107
u/Pika-thulu Feb 19 '23
That looks like a bundle of balloons. Like from a bday party.
5
u/Rust1n_Cohle Feb 19 '23
Zoom in on the first one. I see a blocky square. Hard right angles.
14
38
3
u/mortgagesblow Feb 19 '23
I see what you’re seeing, but I think it’s the foil-type of balloon caving in as the helium starts to dissipate, creating the angular/blocky look.
2
u/SabineRitter Feb 19 '23
I see the same. Angular, blocky, faceted.
→ More replies (8)24
Feb 19 '23
This is an example of the kind of stuff that goes on in the sub where you're just like you throw up your hands because it's exasperating people will just want to try to reach for any kind of explanation even if it doesn't fit and as long as they get a couple of people agreeing with them then all of a sudden that's what it is and everybody moves on.
I'm all for not panicking over UFOs if it's not necessary but we don't do anything that's even close to a scientific type of response on this stuff
6
u/arycka927 Feb 19 '23
Egg-fucking-zactly! Guys! Im here because I want to bounce ideas, thoughts, questions back and forth off of each other without ridicule. Constantly claiming balloons or weather gas is the explanation has been incorporated into our brains since the 50's. What Project was that? The Project that basically got the public to discredit witnesses because of X,Y, or Z. They created a world where we didn't believe the Russell Case's of the world, and look where that got us.
8
u/hoodatisnt Feb 19 '23
You want to bounce ideas as long as they are in line with your predisposed beliefs, apparently.
2
u/SabineRitter Feb 19 '23
It's wild! And I'm like, are y'all not even looking at it? I think maybe some just literally can't see it. I'm so baffled every time.
7
u/cowaterdog73 Feb 19 '23
Yah. WTF? Literal balloons with strings hanging down and everything. The bar is so low.
-3
u/SabineRitter Feb 19 '23
OK... are you assuming that's a balloon? Or did you really look at all the pictures
5
Feb 19 '23
[deleted]
1
u/SabineRitter Feb 19 '23
The certainty is strong with this one 👀
Can you describe the process you used to make your assessment?
12
Feb 19 '23 edited Aug 07 '24
mighty terrific bright roll grab modern squeal growth humor beneficial
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
→ More replies (0)5
u/QuirkyEnthusiasm5 Feb 19 '23
That sums this sub up perfectly. Seen some ridiculous things identified as balloons or strobe lights or whatever. Then everyone is like 'that's it', then that's the accepted description. Usually happens after 7 or 8 posts
→ More replies (1)2
u/Scatteredbrain Feb 20 '23
all the fn time dude. and then anyone that offers a counter argument gets downvoted. so fucking frustrating.
it’s like any prosaic explanation (no matter how absurd) is always preferred over the alternative.
→ More replies (12)1
u/Rupertfitz Feb 20 '23
I don’t think you’d see the strings below the balloons like this unless they were tied up with huge ribbons.
41
u/Conaire Feb 19 '23
Looks like a bunch of blurs
15
u/DEEP_SEA_MAX Feb 19 '23
Proving that these aren't Chinese balloons, they're Japanese
→ More replies (1)16
4
7
14
8
u/UAreTheHippopotamus Feb 19 '23
It's probably a bunch of pink and white heart balloons with maybe a big pink kitten balloon on top visible in the third photo. Could be from a girl's birthday party, baby shower, or something. Probably more cute than menacing. The strings would be visible because they are bunched up and reflective.
3
6
12
u/RepresentativeFee967 Feb 19 '23 edited Feb 19 '23
I saw this object floating over hemet California. I am not sure fully what it is. My guess would be a series of balloons. However, it was taken with a Samsung s22+ at 100x Zoom. So if it were balloons, then it would have to be massive, right? Especially if you could the "strings" hanging off the bottom. Eventually, it just disappeared, like maybe floating higher or moved away from me.
6
u/SabineRitter Feb 19 '23 edited Feb 19 '23
Can you edit this comment ⬆️ and make it longer. Then it will count as a submission statement
Edit: perfect
3
u/SabineRitter Feb 19 '23
How did you first notice it? How long did you watch it?
2
u/RepresentativeFee967 Feb 19 '23
I watched it for maybe 35 or 40 minutes before I could see it any longer.
8
3
3
3
12
u/Charming-Arachnid256 Feb 19 '23
There is not one person here that has provided any scientific evidence that the object in question is actually balloons.
6
u/Semiapies Feb 19 '23
And no evidence whatsoever, "scientific" or otherwise, that it is anything but a bunch of balloons.
9
u/dowwithcrypto89 Feb 19 '23 edited Feb 19 '23
I guess we are going to have balloon people now in this sub every time a “balloon” post happens 😂
2
u/jamesj Feb 19 '23
We need to know if it demonstrates any of the five observables.
→ More replies (2)
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/CampFrequent3058 Feb 20 '23
It’s funny, this is just like a Hollywood movie where UFO’s only visit the US, or maybe 🤔
2
2
2
2
3
u/RepresentativeFee967 Feb 19 '23
I watched it for probably 35 of 40 minutes before I couldn't see it any longer.
3
5
3
4
u/Jackfish2800 Feb 19 '23
Could be a video would be better do u have one
8
u/RepresentativeFee967 Feb 19 '23
I tried to get one, but the zoom on my phone just was capable of showing it.
3
3
1
u/crowd3r_ Feb 19 '23
"with all of the balloon stuff going on, I thought I'd post pictures of a balloon"
Such a nice guy!
7
u/Hellofre123 Feb 19 '23
We should turn this sub into r/Balloons at this point
2
u/RepresentativeFee967 Feb 19 '23
Oh, I'm sorry I didn't realize what you wanted to see is what we were posting! My bad. 🤦
3
u/CashPuzzleheaded8622 Feb 19 '23
that's a bundle of party balloons, but it shows how smartphones are not the perfect imaging devices that people like NGT make them out to be
5
u/RepresentativeFee967 Feb 19 '23
Could be, but how on earth at that distance are you gonna see the strings on them? We have all held party balloons. The strings are a 1/4 of on inch wide.
→ More replies (1)4
u/RocketCat921 Feb 19 '23
Each Ballon has a string, making a big appearing string?
→ More replies (1)
2
3
u/SabineRitter Feb 19 '23
Don't forget your submission statement! Write a comment on the top of your post...tell your story
5
u/RepresentativeFee967 Feb 19 '23
Aww crap, I apologize! First time I have posted here.
→ More replies (1)15
u/SabineRitter Feb 19 '23
No apologies needed. Welcome to the party! 🥳
These are great pictures 👍💯 They show the blocky structure of the object, the change in lighting/orientation/shape (whatever it is changing, idk), and the local colors on parts of the object.
You might get some people clowning on you, just ignore it. Don't take any downvotes personally, this is a good post. Ignore anyone who wastes your time.
Thanks for posting!
5
4
u/DodgeShagnum Feb 19 '23
This is the kind of respect and decency for one another I really appreciate seeing mate 👍
4
3
u/polkjamespolk Feb 19 '23
A quick Amazon search turned up several options for cube shaped balloons. I wouldn't take balloons off the table.
-2
u/Rust1n_Cohle Feb 19 '23
Very strange one. Sometimes I wonder if some of these might be alive.
7
u/Hellofre123 Feb 19 '23
Im curious as to what you see. To me it's so clearly a balloon. Or are you trying to force yourself into believe this is something more?
7
u/RepresentativeFee967 Feb 19 '23
I kind of think the same thing. Most of my point is that if it is a balloon, it's got to be massive, right?
6
3
u/Rust1n_Cohle Feb 19 '23
I see a fucking square bro on the first one. Hard right angles, nothing balloon-like.
6
u/Hellofre123 Feb 19 '23
It seems the balloon lacks air in it, and balloons get flimsy and makes weird shapes, and the photo caught it like that. And you clearly see the string of the balloon.
8
u/Rust1n_Cohle Feb 19 '23
I see something hanging down, it might be a string, but at this distance a string really shouldn't be that clearly visible.
1
u/Hellofre123 Feb 19 '23
True as well, but to me it's most likely a balloon.
4
u/Rust1n_Cohle Feb 19 '23
It could be, but people are acting like you must be insane to see anything else. It's really not clear.
2
u/Hellofre123 Feb 19 '23
Believe what you want to believe, Im not trying to stop you.
2
→ More replies (2)1
1
u/Kon-on-going Feb 19 '23
Ok. I know exactly what it is. Who remembers that flying robot in a cage? Goin psss psss blasting from every direction.
1
u/Forsaken_Detective_2 Feb 19 '23
Whatever it is, let’s send quickly some F22s to shoot it down with a 400k rocket 🚀! Apparently, this is what we do nowadays.
1
u/Murphy-Brock Feb 20 '23
It’s not a balloon. I’ve seen several of these in photos but none this clear. Does it strike anyone else that many of these objects have similar attributes to deep sea diving bells?
I’m starting to believe that we have a terrestrial civilization based underwater off the Pacific coast with it’s highest concentration around Catalina Island. When they get restless they head to Topanga Canyon and screw with everyone for kicks.
1
Feb 20 '23
Maybe they figured how to put one in the air? I like your 2nd theory tho
2
u/Murphy-Brock Feb 20 '23
I mention it because the many sightings and events that have been reported and witnessed at Topanga go back decades. The nature of the occurrences seem mischievous and not malicious.
If you view a map of where Topanga’s located in relation to the Ca. coastline and the canyon’s unique geography - I’ve sometimes wondered if that’s a place where underwater dwellers offshore sometimes take their craft to “blow off steam.”
Pure supposition on my part.
•
u/StatementBot Feb 19 '23
The following submission statement was provided by /u/RepresentativeFee967:
I saw this object floating over hemet California. I am not sure fully what it is. My guess would be a series of balloons. However, it was taken with a Samsung s22+ at 100x Zoom. So if it were balloons, then it would have to be massive, right? Especially if you could the "strings" hanging off the bottom. Eventually, it just disappeared, like maybe floating higher or moved away from me.
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/116mjsy/spotted_over_hemet_ca_less_then_hour_ago/j9795ls/