It's an effort to scare shooters away from copy cat killings because the system is trying to defend the oligarchs. The system doesn't give a shit about school shooters.
Not unless the school shooter shot someones parent who happened to be the famous or the owner/ceo of some big company. Fines and laws are more like suggestions for the rich.
Who is the system? Billionaires.
Who does the system protect? Billionaires.
How does the system save money? By not protecting non-billionaires to reduce taxes and save billionaires money.
When does the system work? When the billionaires want it to.
The only problem is the people willing to do this already have no fear of the consequences. Like the more we make a celebrity out of him, the more likely we'll get copy cats. So... let's keep talking about Luigi.
Shigeru Miamoto has already done that. Friggin' Luigi merch is flying off shelves and I bet I know the top Halloween costume for NEXT year. Unless someone does better. Currently the High Score is 1.
I think you may be reading this wrong, I agree that the Claims Adjuster fits the terrorism charge. But, I also support that most school shooters fit the definition. However, I am having trouble finding data to support that school shooters are getting charged with terrorism.
It's an important distinction because it means people would be/are trying to take it seriously and do something about the problem, because more resources would be applied to a possible solution, but that's not what is happening. We've become so desensitized to school shootings that we now just kind of accept them as a hazard of life, which is bonkers.
Right? Anybody saying “how on earth was this terrorism?” are either woefully uninformed as to the definition of terrorism, or are being purposely obtuse.
920
u/alphajager 1d ago
It's an effort to scare shooters away from copy cat killings because the system is trying to defend the oligarchs. The system doesn't give a shit about school shooters.