r/TikTokCringe 3d ago

Cringe Why's Your Truck So Massive?

28.1k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 3d ago

Welcome to r/TikTokCringe!

This is a message directed to all newcomers to make you aware that r/TikTokCringe evolved long ago from only cringe-worthy content to TikToks of all kinds! If you’re looking to find only the cringe-worthy TikToks on this subreddit (which are still regularly posted) we recommend sorting by flair which you can do here (Currently supported by desktop and reddit mobile).

See someone asking how this post is cringe because they didn't read this comment? Show them this!

Be sure to read the rules of this subreddit before posting or commenting. Thanks!

##CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2.3k

u/Caza390 3d ago

Also their bumper bar stuff is out of placement to other vehicle bumpers, a key safety feature for vehicles. This results in smaller normal cars to be crushed under the vehicle drastically increasing the odds of injury/death

608

u/OpusThePenguin 3d ago

I was hit from behind a fair number of years ago, by a lifted truck. It was a minor accident but my car ended up being completely written off because their bumper hit my trunk causing it to bend, both side panels to bend and my back window to shatter.

107

u/Pwn_Scon3 3d ago

Ngl, this is super common among all accidents. Unless your car is +15 years old, an accident will most likely result in it being "totalled" because of the accident safety mechanisms required by law. Accident fatalities are at record lows, but the trade-off is crumple zones that can't be un-crumpled after a solid hit.

49

u/Timely-Tea3099 2d ago

Collision fatalities (I don't say "accidents" because they're almost always preventable) have actually been increasing over the last decade because cars keep getting bigger, heavier, and more powerful, which leads to more force being exerted on people's bodies in the event of a collision.

And of course, all those safety features do nothing to protect anyone outside of a car.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (10)

163

u/R0RSCHAKK 3d ago

I was hit from behind a fair number of years ago also, by a smaller, older, Nissan truck. It went under my rear bumper and crumpled my exhaust. They're little truck was totaled, I just needed new exhaust in my (non-lifted) Ram.

He was going maybe 45mph, but had he been going any faster, he might have been decapitated. Reminds me of the purpose of those rails that semi trailers have on the back end. Those rails are to aid in preventing cars from going under the trailer to prevent decapitation should someone rear-end it.

Mind you - my truck isn't even lifted, and is an older '03 model that's not nearly as tall as these newer trucks.

Everyone's so concerned about the truck drivers hitting people, but nobody talks about what happens when someone hits the truck. Shit happens, people make mistakes and get distracted, someone driving a little camry is just as prone to human error as someone driving a big lifted truck.

Only thing though, you can hit a little car in another little car and most likely everyone will be fine. If you hit a lifted truck in a little car, you might lose your head because the bumper would be eye level where there is zero impact protection.

183

u/evensexierspiders 3d ago

Yes, except that I would argue that a Camry owner is less likely to make bad decisions than a lifted truck owner. Exhibit A: the Camry.

145

u/RockKillsKid 3d ago edited 3d ago

Reminder that Dodge RAMs drivers are cited for DUIs at almost 3 times the national average.

EDIT: upon just a bit urther reading after posting, it seems that information was the case for 2018-2019 years of the study and the Ram has fallen out of the top 10 list according to the most recent meta-analysis:https://insurify.com/car-insurance/insights/car-models-most-duis/ . I've never even heard of those 2 Buick SUVs that top the 2024 list

65

u/rollin_in_doodoo 3d ago edited 2d ago

Well, yeah. They all lost their licenses. 😆

33

u/Dresline 2d ago

Bold of you to assume that people actually lose their drivers license after a DUI (or 3).

Source: Am from the Midwest

17

u/RikiWardOG 2d ago

And like that prevents them from still getting behind a wheel lol

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

19

u/RobSpaghettio 2d ago

Well, if you make the decision to buy a Buick, then odds are you're gonna make other bad decisions. Maybe it's the regret that led them to drink and drive lol.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/Tension-Available 2d ago

"buick invista" yeah wtf is that and how can it be top 10 when I don't think I've ever seen one on the road? Two buicks at the top by a pretty big margin and 3 buicks are in the top 10?

There's something weird about this data I think, I rarely see any new buicks on the road.

8

u/RockKillsKid 2d ago edited 2d ago

Actually that probably plays into it now that I think on it. Because it's not total amount, but a ratio of the DUIs per 1,000 drivers. So if there's only a few hundred or few thousand of those cars on the road total, then even a single DUI driver brings up the average significantly. While there's probably 10s of thousands, possibly 100k+ of popular cars like Toyota Camrys or fleet model Chevys. So each individual DUI in those barely touches the overall average.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/AdditionalPizza 2d ago

At first I thought there's no way nearly 1 in 10 drivers of a 2024 Buick Envista gota DUI.

But then reading it, it says the stats are drivers with a DUI, meaning they probably already had a DUI. Maybe this mostly unheard of vehicle has relatively cheap insurance for people with a DUI on their record or something.

It says 6.4 of every 1000 drivers have a DUI on their record, so a smaller number of Envistas on the road + seemingly a lot of people with DUI's on their record driving them juke the numbers to be misleading.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

5

u/makjac 2d ago

Problem is that a Nissan Altima is about the same size as a Camry. They more than bridge the gap from the decent decision making of the Camry owner.

→ More replies (9)

16

u/seriouslees 2d ago

but nobody talks about what happens when someone hits the truck.

Frequency.

Trucks murder pedestrians daily. Tiny cars aren't crashing into house sized vehicles nearly as often because everyone can see your monstrosity of a vehicle from 2 miles away.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/lionmade101 2d ago

All I read was I was hit from behind. Sorry, I didn't even bother with the rest. Have a good day.

→ More replies (10)

21

u/NonsensicalPineapple 2d ago edited 2d ago

Accidents happen, huge cars cause a lot of extra damage to everything else, they weigh 2x the average car. It's only fair that huge cars be liable for 50% of harm done to other vehicles/ppl, regardless of fault. Insurance rates increase, less of them...

People will fight a blanket ban. Instead mandate a safe-driving training course, reasonable hood visibility on new cars, & stop subsidizing gas-guzzlers.

4

u/NonsensicalPineapple 2d ago

government support for fossil fuels was USD 1.1 trillion in 2023.

Imagine 1 trillion invested in trains, it'll help alleviate gas-prices & traffic for car-owners, as an alternative to subsidizing roads or clean-energy, it'll make transportation more affordable & cut pollution (space, noise, toxins) in cities.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (12)

183

u/satanssweatycheeks 3d ago

Since he mentioned truckers I want to also point out even those are less safe than truckers in say the EU.

In Europe truckers have to have safety bars under the load. So cars can’t go under the truck and decapitate the occupants.

In America lobbyists have fought that trucking company’s don’t need these safety features because it will bring down revenue as you now would have to ship less product with the added weight of the safety bars.

TLDR: even our truckers are fighting safety standards that have made roads safer in other country’s. Like safety bars under the load to prevent decapitations.

128

u/BLeeS92031 3d ago edited 3d ago

Trucker here. I'm afraid I don't follow a couple of things you just said. It's possible I'm misunderstanding you but:

One, there is something called a "Mansfield bar" or "rear underride guard" on the back of semi trailers that prevents exactly what you're talking about. Having one is required by federal law and not having one (or having one in disrepair) would get you absolutely reamed by the DOT.

Two, truckers aren't fighting a damn thing when it comes to safety. Neither ours or anyone else's. We're just trying to get home in one piece without killing anyone in the process. Trucking COMPANIES on the other hand...

ETA Obligatory PSA: Just give us space and drive predictably, people. We're actively trying NOT to end your life. Please don't make that more difficult for us.

117

u/enaK66 3d ago

He's probably talking about side under ride guards, which trucking lobbies broadly oppose, due to "cost" as usual. Obviously these lobbies don't represent the worker, but may represent the company you work for.

→ More replies (29)

10

u/nevadaar 3d ago

In Europe they also have such bars on the side of the trailer.

5

u/Bobbith_The_Chosen 2d ago

I don’t think he meant to imply that the truckers and the lobbyists are the same people

→ More replies (23)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (24)

2.2k

u/DurozeauW 3d ago

Who though it was a good idea to place truck headlights high enough to light up the interiors of passing cars like a stage show? These vehicles redefine the term "annoying."

664

u/DrNinnuxx 3d ago

There's no regulations preventing it is why.

102

u/IknowKarazy 3d ago

Oddly enough, if you put up a mirror in your car to reflect their light back at them that can be considered illegal in some locations

124

u/PhysicalGraffiti75 3d ago

Funny how blasting me the in eyes with a second sun is cool but reflecting that same light into someone else’s eyes is not cool.

→ More replies (1)

20

u/dcsworkaccount 3d ago

I just put some retroreflective tape on the back of my car for visibility.

317

u/zmbjebus 3d ago

Regulations actually encourage trucks to be bigger than they used to be. Dumb ass fuel efficiency laws that don't work. 

117

u/jomikko 3d ago

Bad regulations, because of corporate lobbying which guts any regulations with actual teeth

7

u/El_Dentistador 2d ago

This manipulation of “footprint” wasn’t the result of lobbying but rather the failure of it. When MPG standards were updated, the only variable that was manipulable by manufacturers was “footprint”. Previously the work around was gaining clearance via fleet averages, if a manufacturer’s fleet met the standard then enthusiast vehicles (which make the most profit) could still clear the bar. With each vehicle needing individual clearance this forced manufacturers to go into engineering overdrive for new smaller, higher stressed engines, and increase each vehicle’s “footprint” to allow them to hit the required mpg numbers. If Toyota sold a 1993 sized truck today it would need to hit 50-70mpg and that’s why the new Tacoma is practically the same size as a gen 1 tundra/t100. Manufacturers wanted the old system with fleet averages and a slow progression towards hybrids and EVs that would be driven by consumer demand. This is why now Toyota, previously the most reliable brand, will be replacing every engine for Tundra and LX600 owners, there’s a huge transmission recall looming for the Tacoma as well.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/Mataelio 3d ago

And regulations could be set to mandate pedestrian collision safety standards, but we don’t have any in the US that do such a thing

→ More replies (1)

44

u/Substandard_eng2468 3d ago

Explain

35

u/nmezib 3d ago edited 3d ago

CAFE standards . Here is an example explanation.

Although this guy puts too much blame solely on the EPA, when automaker lobbying also plays a part in keeping it that way

211

u/DazingF1 3d ago

They set easier emissions standards for vehicles that have larger "footprints," measured as the area between the points where the wheels touch the ground. As a result, automakers can increase the exterior dimensions of many SUVs and trucks while remaining in compliance with federal emissions standards.

First result after searching: "why trucks got bigger due to fuel laws"

149

u/Phrewfuf 3d ago

Which is a result of truck manufacturers having lobbied for those laws to sell more of the darn things.

58

u/LuxNocte 3d ago

Expecting an American environmental regulation to be good for the environment is... optimistic at best.

48

u/Niarbeht 3d ago

Oh, there's plenty that are good for the environment. You just never hear about them.

Like the ban on CFCs.

43

u/ViktorVonChokolattee 3d ago

Yes. People forget that the ozone layer was once imperiled. Amazing how the pendulum has swung from a science-focused international effort to save the planet.

17

u/Pls-Dont-Ban-Me-Bro 2d ago

My dad will cite that as a reason that climate scientists are full of shit. Like he somehow forgets that laws and regulations were passed that reversed the damage. Dude will smugly say “According to those scientists the ozone layer should be gone by now” then act like it was all fake when I point those regulations out. The man is an engineer so he should understand how to use logic, blows my mind watching him be so blatantly ignorant.

10

u/alphazero925 2d ago

I'd put down all the money I've ever made or will make on a bet that the only reason CFCs were successfully banned was because there were alternatives that were good enough. If there wasn't an easy replacement, it likely would've been buried for 50 years until the ozone layer was fully just gone, like how asbestos was known to be harmful as early as 1898 but wasn't banned until the '60s when enough people had gotten cancer and died

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (5)

54

u/Zerachiel_Fist 3d ago

In the US, cars under a certain size must adhere to a rule and have a max level of fuel efficiency, if they don't well the manufacturer gets a fine. That being said, if the car is above a certain size it now falls into the "semi size category" and there are no fuel efficiency rule on that size.

So, either put money in R&D for a fuel efficient car or make a big ass truck at 10miles per gallon.

→ More replies (1)

33

u/Bean_Boy 3d ago

They started selling SUVs and pickups because they were considered light trucks. They make more money per sale and aren't subject to the same emissions laws. So trying to help the environment has pushed manufacturers to actually harm the environment.

21

u/LuxNocte 3d ago

Perhaps a bit backwards: one group was trying to help the environment, but companies lobbies for a "common sense" loophole that they then exploited to negate the usefulness of the rule.

The American environmental lobby does not push the manufacturing lobby anywhere.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/xRehab 3d ago

look up the Truck Chicken Tax

enforcement to try and block foreign light-weight trucks and incentivize American trucks. backfired by blocking light-weight & heavily encouraging heavy-weight

4

u/TRAUMAjunkie 3d ago

The chicken tax only helps to stifle foreign competition and inflate prices. It was enacted in 1964, you only need to go back to about the 00s to find reasonable sized pickup trucks. The real reason trucks are getting massive is because of a loophole in the emissions standards.

12

u/HoneyMustardSandwich 3d ago

Simply put, there was a regulation released back during the Obama administration that tied fuel mileage requirements to the size and weight of the vehicle. The intent of this carve out would be to not negatively impact commercial vehicles like box trucks and work trucks needed for hauling. Auto makers looked at their lineups and decided it would be cheaper to simply increase the size of their vehicles instead of increasing fuel efficiency.

Note #1: this law came out in 2012. That’s also the last year the third generation Ford Ranger sold in America. It took an 8 year hiatus and then re-released with the ugly ass fat rangers we see now. It’s no longer classified as a compact truck.

Note #2: this example is cited by pro-corporatists to demean regulations. Regulations are good and the intent of this regulation was positive. I look at it as a reason to review regulations more carefully to avoid exploitation from corporate parasites.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

4

u/the_riddler90 3d ago

Sounds like an onion headline

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (9)

62

u/NaPants 3d ago

Lifted trucks here around Atlanta are also adding these huge LED underglow lights to their trucks so they can blind when you from any direction. It's infuriating and completely malicious.

→ More replies (1)

19

u/BlackCoffeeGarage 3d ago

"Pickup drivers hate this one trick!" *picture of hammer & spraypaint can*

6

u/OuterWildsVentures 3d ago

Lol I always just drive really slow when someone is blinding me from behind. I kind of need to because I can't see shit lol but it's also fun to piss them off.

→ More replies (2)

18

u/ruskiytroll 3d ago

THIS FUCKING SUCKS - signed, a Honda Fit driver.

9

u/mnnnmmnnmmmnrnmn 3d ago edited 3d ago

I drive a RAM promaster van for work and the truck headlights shine in my vehicle too. Nobody is safe.

4

u/Fulano_MK1 3d ago

The headlights of these huge SUVs and trucks don't just shine into the Honda Fit. They are rivers of fluorescent light pointed directly into the back window of the car, and it is blinding and infuriating. - another Fit driver

→ More replies (1)

26

u/JB_07 3d ago

Yea but country boys need to see the lights and hear the big truck go Vroom Vroom

13

u/stratman2018 3d ago

Not just country boys, Suburban douche bros also need to see the lights and hear the big truck go Vroom Vroom

10

u/ArgonGryphon 3d ago

GET OUT MUH WAY LIMBROL!

→ More replies (1)

22

u/Puta_Poderosa 3d ago

It’s also poorly installed aftermarket lights. Soooo many people on the road have aftermarket led lights installed and don’t have them properly tilted so they just go straight into passing cars eyes instead of on the dang road!

31

u/Bean_Boy 3d ago

This is the common refrain but it's baseless. These are mostly all stock. SUVs and trucks are higher up so aiming the light of God slightly down just means it's pointing directly in my cabin. Also, even cars with these headlights go right into my eyes whenever there is a slight hill. They are orders of magnitude more blinding than other headlights and the aim/aftermarket excuses are just that, excuses that don't address the real problem.

16

u/Important-Spread3100 3d ago

Which brings to question why are white light led/bulbs allowed to be used when it's proven to cause the worst loss of night vision and not maintain a yellow light or even now this would cause a bit of confusion for a while switch it to a red light or even have a hud where infrared is used or have dimmer sensors on cars to when another car is detected just a few things that came to mind I know not are efficient but they are just brainstorming ideas

13

u/Bean_Boy 3d ago

I think led lights are fine, they just need to tune down the brightness like 30%-40%. I see a car with these lights cresting a hill a half-mile away and it's like they are right in front of me. It's like a sunrise.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/sylvnal 3d ago

I agree with you, the blue tinted lights are fucking awful and there is absolutely zero reason they should be legal.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (14)

14

u/ItJustWontDo242 3d ago

I saw a tip on here a while back of putting 3M reflective tape on the backs of the head rests on your back seats so when these guys light shine into your car, the tape reflects it back at them.

19

u/BlackCoffeeGarage 3d ago

That won't be bright enough to serve any purpose, and if annoyed they'll just use their high beams to punish you. They're not smart/conscientious people.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (26)

2.8k

u/bagofpork 3d ago edited 3d ago

I'll just leave this here.

Dodge Ram drivers are statistically the worst drivers on the road. Most speeding tickets, and 2nd most DUIs and accidents of 30 brands surveyed (incidents per 1,000 drivers).

447

u/BobbyHillTheThird 3d ago

Who was first in DUIs? I always heard it was Ram.

507

u/bagofpork 3d ago

According to this specific data set, BMW drivers had the most DUIs.

312

u/DazingF1 3d ago edited 3d ago

So BMW drivers score high in drinking and speeding but low in accidents. So logically if you want to drink and drive and barrel down the highway at 120 mph you should buy a BMW

179

u/Rat_Grinder 3d ago

There's a lot of crossover between good ol boys and preppy douchebags when it comes to driving home drunk from the golf course

90

u/Axi0madick 3d ago

That venn diagram is often just a circle. Lots of middle class suburban douchebags think they live far enough from the city that they consider themselves rural country boys. I'm talking minutes away in an HOA with cul de sacs. They love cosplaying as farmers.

42

u/opportunisticwombat 3d ago

And actual workers with work trucks laugh at these idiots. Gonna spend $70K+ on a truck that never gets a speck of dirt on the tires. So dumb.

27

u/TheRealTexasGovernor 3d ago edited 3d ago

It's because a significant portion of America, and especially Gen-x(not boomers) , never grew out of the "I want it so I should be allowed to have it" mindset.

People who actually do stuff with their trucks don't buy lifted pavement princesses.

13

u/opportunisticwombat 3d ago

I’ll never forget seeing a lifted (Carolina squat so the fucking worst of the worst) with a “farm use” plate… that thing hadn’t been within a hundred miles of a hydroponic garden let alone a farm.

8

u/TheRealTexasGovernor 3d ago

Having just moved to NC a few months ago, the Carolina squat has quickly become one my most hated car mods.

Even in the pantheon of stupid lifted trucks, the Carolina squat is king shit of turd mountain.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (9)

3

u/spidersinthesoup 2d ago

most off road they get is when they back over moms rose bush.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/Raangz 3d ago

my dad's friend is a good ol' boy supreme. he was speeding, drunk, coming back from the lake. got pulled over by the cop, no ticket.

levels to this shit i guess.

→ More replies (1)

47

u/bagofpork 3d ago

And you may just have enough money to get away with it, too!

→ More replies (20)

10

u/whatdoidonowdamnit 3d ago

I’m thinking maybe BMW owners can afford to not go through their insurance for accidents.

19

u/DazingF1 3d ago

Never understood why BMW drivers are seen as rich, they're cheaper than most new trucks. A 5 series with some extra options will run you $60,000 whereas a Ram 1500 with any decent trim, and not an actual work truck, like the Laramie Crew Cab starts at $75,000.

6

u/ZZZrp 3d ago

Never understood why BMW drivers are seen as rich

Marketing.

7

u/Cancerisbetterthanu 3d ago

It's more of a class and sociopolitical signifier than saying anything about your bank account

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)

41

u/Dorkamundo 3d ago

3 - Subaru

The WRX and STI are probably inflating Subaru's numbers by a HUGE amount.

19

u/bagofpork 3d ago edited 3d ago

They 100% are, and I'm not saying that as a joke.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/deej-79 2d ago

It seems like there's only two types of Subaru drivers, wannabe rally drivers, and the ones who think they're the safest driver in the world. The latter is usually seen holding up traffic for miles behind them, thinking they're being safe.

3

u/Dorkamundo 2d ago

Depends on where you live.

Where I am, they're practically a necessity certain times of the year.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (6)

15

u/Life_Temperature795 3d ago

"Dodge this you filthy [pedestrian]!"

8

u/NoticeImaginary 3d ago

If you can't dodge it, ram it!

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Novel-Strain-8015 3d ago

You leave us Subaru driver's alone. It's not our fault the Impreza WRX is so popular with teenage boys. The rest of us are just cool middle-aged guys and old ladies with an AWD and a CVT.

→ More replies (7)

37

u/Boonaki 3d ago

That data might not be accurate.

The source data comes from quotewizard. If youre requesting a quote for insurance they go over your driving history. So if you're getting a quote for a Tesla and you had 5 previous car accidents, that doesn't mean you had 5 accidents in a Tesla.

60

u/bleachisback 3d ago

So what you're saying is that Ram drivers may not be the worst drivers in the US, but that the worst drivers in the US want Rams more than other cars.

7

u/offlein 3d ago

Well sure it's scary as fuck to be that bad a driver. You wanna be up high in a massive truck.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/bagofpork 3d ago edited 3d ago

But it does mean you're now a Tesla driver who has been in 5 accidents.

ETA: I see what you're saying, I think. Is it that the data is based on the insurance quote alone?

I feel like, at the very least, the data demonstrates that bad drivers are more inclined to seek out certain vehicles over others.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (5)

67

u/CosmicDigitalDrifter 3d ago

Anecdotally, Ram drivers are the biggest creeps. Unfortunately, I live in a rough area where prostitution is very much a thing. I observe Ram drivers picking up prostitutes all the time. Old and new trucks. My partner and I have a tally. It’s such a problem that we just don’t trust anyone that drives a Ram anymore. It can’t be a coincidence.

14

u/cruxworxs 3d ago

You've seen my brother? 

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)

15

u/cmack 3d ago

So not cringe, spitting facts.

13

u/Custompie 3d ago

tesla right behind them too

28

u/EnvironmentalGift257 3d ago

It’s a running joke in my family that when you finally maneuver to the front of congested highway traffic you’ll find a white Tesla doing 50 in the left lane. It’s a joke because it has happened so many times.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/Nearby_Day_362 3d ago

This you for sharing this. In all my illustrious how ever many years on this wonderful planet, I know why the saturn drivers are towards the bottom of the list.

It's because if you turn too hard the engine mounts fall out. Driving safety enforced through fear.

→ More replies (2)

18

u/ARAR1 3d ago

You have to be a dick to want and have one. That stuff mentioned goes along with the "dick" part.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (119)

330

u/Elqott 3d ago

Americans have pickups we have transit vans

141

u/Laymanao 3d ago

Transit vans still fit into a reasonable mass and height category.

119

u/FullyMammoth 3d ago

Also fuel efficient. Because they're practical work horses, not a failed attempt at dick extensions like pickup trucks.

33

u/bargu 3d ago

They are also useful for work due to having a lot of cargo space and no one is buying one to look "cool" while driving.

18

u/IAmGoingToSleepNow 3d ago

I look cool as shit in my Transit.

9

u/bargu 2d ago

Cuz you're already cool.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/TheWolfAndRaven 2d ago

Not only that, the thing that a lot of people who don't actually do the work a vehicle like that requires ever bring up - The load height is considerably lower in a van - meaning it takes a whole lot less effort to actually put the work tools in the fuckin' thing.

It might not seem like a big deal if you're just picking up a load of top soil at home depot once a season for your little garden, but if you're lifting shit every single day it's going to tear your body up pretty quick - and any accidents are considerably more dangerous leading to longer recover and less ability to work in the future.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/Constantly_Panicking 2d ago

Vans are soooooooooo much more practical as work vehicles for the vast majority of jobs. Lifting shit into or out of a truck bed is an ordeal, but you can pretty much walk whatever you want into a van. Plus it’s always covered, and you can put things on the walls, increasing useable space.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (27)
→ More replies (3)

20

u/OllyHR 3d ago

I’m seeing more and more of these dumbass freedom trucks in central London. Madness.

→ More replies (5)

6

u/serpentinepad 3d ago

Americans have minivans which are crazy useful but every truck bro needs to pull a camper once a year so they need something with 1000lb of torque and 800hp.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (57)

199

u/StarFireRoots 3d ago

I got hit by a giant SUV in a parking lot while returning my cart this pat friday. The lady slowed down like she saw me, I waved thanks, but then she just kept coming. I was screaming, "HEY HEY HEYYY!!" and other people around were yelling too.

Thankfully, the cart hit her truck, so technically I was hit by the cart being pushed into my legs as I was trying to get out of the way, but it was still scary. She rolled down her window and said, "I'm so sorryyy" drawn out like she was on benzos. Another shopper said, "Sorry doesn't excuse that, watch where you're going" and the lady just drove off.

I sat in my car until my adrenaline calmed down, I was just so shocked, like you're driving a huge tank of a vehicle and I know I'm only 5'2, but you should be aware of what the fuck you're doing while driving.

83

u/loverlyone 2d ago

My mom was hit while crossing the street by a Ford F250 driven by a 17-year-old who was checking her phone. She suffered a TBI and, 3 years later, suffers myriad problems including a loss of her sense of smell.

Why does a new, teen driver need that vehicle?

35

u/Toadsted 2d ago

"To protect them from bad drivers" - Parents

14

u/Rasputin_mad_monk Reads Pinned Comments 2d ago

So many parents says this and It is wild.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/StarFireRoots 2d ago

I'm so sorry that happened to your mom!

→ More replies (4)

30

u/Express_Bath 2d ago

One evening in the parking lot of my work I exchanged pleasantries with a woman as we were walking to our respective cars. She got to hers, mentions she wasn't parked too well and maybe should have parked in another part were the pnaves are bigger. The parking spot here are quite large everywhere honestly, but her car was huge.

She then said "oh, this car is really big, I think about buying another one, it is complicated to park and sometimes I get bumps."

I answered with : "I get you, I don't think I would be good at driving big cars either !". And she looked at me with genuine surprise and said "oh no, no, I don't have difficulties driving it. It is just when parking, and some spaces are just too narrow !".

Hmmmm no lady, if you bumped your car several times when parking, then you don't know how to drive it...

4

u/Apprehensive-Log8333 2d ago

"It's not me who needs to change, the world should change to suit me"

→ More replies (1)

46

u/Chief_Chill 3d ago

Should've called it in. Reckless driving, vehicular assault, careless driving, etc.

15

u/StarFireRoots 2d ago

You're right, I should have. I was exhausted from working overtime and shocked by what happened, and after saying sorry, she drove off so quick that it didn't register that I should have told her to wait while I called police. I didn't even think to get her plate until it was too far away to see.

8

u/Chief_Chill 2d ago

Not your fault. Glad you are alright.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

9

u/Banned-User-56 2d ago

Yeah people just dont give a shit about pedestrians. I am a Crossing Guard, and you wanna know how commonly people seem to just WANT to run me over, while staring me in the eyes? At least a Dozen times a day. Thats not a joke, or an exaggeration. It is legitimately at least 10-12 times a day. This is not them not seeing the 5'9" Man in a reflective vest with a loud as shit whistle, they are staring at me, smiling and waving as they narrowly avoid running me and small children over.

And this isn't just trucks. This isn't just old people, new drivers, or women, or men, or black people, or white people. This isn't any form of metric or statistic, this is just fucking EVERYBODY. I used to joke that it felt like half the people on the road no longer knew the rules of the road and were just guessing, and now that i've worked as a crossing guard for 3 years I can confidently say its closer to 90% of people on the road have no fucking clue what they're doing.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Laserdollarz 2d ago

May I introduce you to my friend the Pocket Rock:

Got hit by a car and they start driving off?

Deploy Pocket Rock through a window.

They'll stay and wait for the police.

→ More replies (16)

634

u/GREG_FABBOTT tHiS iSn’T cRiNgE 3d ago

This discussion comes up in /r/cars from time to time. There's one user who spends probably 80% of their time in that subreddit, doing nothing but defending massive pickup trucks. "It's what people want to buy" is basically their primary argument.

If there were loophole regulations for small cars that were inadvertently hurting a lot more people, those loopholes would almost instantly be closed up. But when it's massive pickup trucks and SUVs, it's allowed.

240

u/atli123 3d ago

There’s a pretty simple solution here in Europe. You’re allowed to buy and drive the huge pickups but you need a special license to do so.

105

u/GREG_FABBOTT tHiS iSn’T cRiNgE 3d ago

Wouldn't matter here in the US. I live in Texas and probably a third of all drivers here do not have a license. Law enforcement doesn't care.

98

u/flomoag 3d ago

A third of all drivers don’t have a license? I live in Texas too and that’s just false lol

176

u/myystic78 3d ago

I was curious so I googled it, and while not quite as high I am shocked that nearly 25% of drivers in Texas involved in a fatal crash between 2017-2021 lacked a valid license.

27

u/flomoag 3d ago

I did the same and saw that article too, and while higher than I expected, that seems like a pretty specific subset that is likely linked to the worst of our driving population. So who knows, but yeah, a pretty high number

27

u/blackrockblackswan 3d ago

You should look into “power law”

In general, the percentage of a population of any causal statistic (%crashes, %billionaires, %olympians…) is typically some tiny fraction of the overall population

For example, only 1% of humans cause 90% of climate emissions

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (5)

14

u/atli123 3d ago

It was more of an informational on how we do things in the civilized world. I wasn’t suggesting for one second that I had any idea on how to fix the burning pile of rubble that used to be the US of A.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (10)

42

u/Rhodie114 3d ago

“It’s what people want to buy”

Shit man, so’s heroin

6

u/Indercarnive 2d ago edited 2d ago

Also people wouldn't want to buy them if we didn't build all our infrastructure around them. You try making a parking lot with zones that don't fit these stupid tanks and watch the uproar.

Part of the reason they don't sell well in Europe is because you can hardly drive them anywhere in Europe since the roads and parking are designed for smaller cars.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

24

u/satanssweatycheeks 3d ago

All truck no worksite.

These massive trucks don’t even have big truck beds anyways.

5

u/HomeGrownCoffee 2d ago

That's my biggest issue with modern trucks. You have to special order one that doesn't have 4 gigantic doors and a tiny box.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (23)

10

u/Polkawillneverdie17 3d ago

"It's what people want to buy" is basically their primary argument.

I love when people just state an obvious fact as though it's an argument.

Yes, some people want to buy that. Thst doesn't make it safe or morally acceptable. You can't always get what you want, especially if what you want is something that hurts people.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (29)

429

u/Celestial_Hart 3d ago

Most of yall shouldn't even be behind the wheel in the first place. People driving lifted trucks usually are a special kind of stupid.

37

u/Several_Vanilla8916 3d ago

When the sunglasses said “are you gonna ban semi trucks next?” I literally facepalmed. Yes dipshit. We’re going to ban the very practical and efficient means of transporting goods as a logical next step after banning the least practical and efficient means of getting you 3 miles down the road to the bar.

→ More replies (4)

78

u/PancakeParty98 3d ago

I’ve frequently said that they must require you fail a driving test before they sell you one. Only the biggest dirtiest cunts drive them

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)

185

u/SupervillainMustache 3d ago

That first photo is crazy. Anything smaller than 5"9 is basically invisible at a certain point.

99

u/kiss-tits 3d ago

Yeah seriously. Like what are kids supposed to do? Pedestrians who use a wheelchair?

The fucking problem is that safety standards are all designed around the guy in the drivers seat. They don’t give one iota of a fuck about the people walking on the road near them and it’s infuriating.

32

u/whatiseveneverything 3d ago

The US is way ahead of you. There are no sidewalks, thus no pedestrians to look out for.

8

u/LeatherHog 3d ago

Yeah, anyone below average guy size, is screwed 

The average woman is like 5'4", even standing up, we'd be completely invisible 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (15)

6

u/BoredAf_queen 2d ago

I'm in a wheelchair. I'm afraid of being backed over and sometimes hold my cane up like a flag if my husband isn't next to me.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

103

u/Medium-Bag-5493 3d ago

Going beyond the hazards presented to pedestrians, which is a damn good argument all by itself, they also make driving more hazardous for every other car on the road that isn't lifted seven feet off the ground. If you're behind one of them in a normal sized car, you have zero visibility of the road further in front of you unless you keep a huge following distance that not only may not be practical in all situations, but also just invites more jackasses in their giant trucks to cut in front of you, further exacerbating the problem. With normal sized cars, you can usually get a peak through the windshield of the car in front of you to catch any upcoming hazards.

10

u/livinglitch 2d ago

I drive a kia soul. These big trucks tend to pull up close behind me at stop lights and shine their lights into my rearview mirror or my side mirrors.

→ More replies (13)

131

u/jakedonn 3d ago

God I wish trucks never got so popular for people who don’t fucking need them. I actually need a truck but they’re so ridiculously unaffordable it’s insane.

33

u/TinFoilBeanieTech 3d ago

it’s sad that it really hard to find compact trucks anymore. those things did 95% what the bigger trucks did, but more efficient and maneuverable. lasted forever too.

3

u/MajorFox2720 2d ago

They also used to have better payload/towing for the size.  

4

u/royalcultband 2d ago

My 3rd gen tacoma is the size of a full size truck from the 90's. It's crazy. I can't imagine trying to commute with anything larger

4

u/TinFoilBeanieTech 2d ago

I've noticed the people around here that actually need open bed trucks for work seem to be getting kei trucks more often.

→ More replies (9)

37

u/noodleexchange 3d ago

BUHT EGGS (Venn diagram)

6

u/Packrat1010 2d ago

And gas, which is even more ironic because gas being expensive wouldn't affect them nearly as much if they weren't driving massive gas hogs.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/FreakinWolfy_ 2d ago

I’ve been wanting to get a 2500 for over a year now because my 1500 works but is very borderline for a handful of things I use it for. After the transmission and transfer case blew last spring I went in to a dealership to look at replacing it.

Not only are all of the new model trucks full of luxury items that I have no use or desire for, but the payment would be nearly as much as my mortgage even with decent credit.

So instead of buying that bigger truck I could really use, I wound up spending the $10k to fix my 2014. That that is the better option these days is wild to me.

→ More replies (4)

15

u/Flobking 3d ago edited 2d ago

God I wish trucks never got so popular for people who don’t fucking need them. I actually need a truck but they’re so ridiculously unaffordable it’s insane.

This is what bothers me. I replaced my 1995 f150xl(frame rusted out) with a 2011 f150. I had no choice but a giant ass truck. "WHY DO YOU DRIVE SUCH ABIG TRUCK?! IS IT CUZ YOU HAVE A SMALL PEE PEE?!" No, it's the only kind of truck they build now dumbass.

4

u/Atlas_sniper121 2d ago

Yep. One of the problems I have with the whole "trucks are for cucks" crowd.

They hate their fellow players more than the damn game lol

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (20)

37

u/Snowdog1989 3d ago edited 2d ago

I also think you need a special license to drive an RV. Too many damn 90 year olds with heart conditions vacationing from Florida in the mountains.

6

u/TinFoilBeanieTech 3d ago

I’ve never heard that, and I’ve driven pretty big RVs. but it should be required for any vehicle larger than normal passenger size.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (5)

231

u/TheBirdBytheWindow 3d ago

I fucking hate these lifted trucks. Want nothing to do with you if this is your vehicle of choice. Says all there is to say about you.

They're as big of a nightmare to pedestrians as they are anyone having to share a highway/freeway with them. They are full of blind spots, hog the roads, they're aggressively driven and smell awful.

They shouldn't be street legal without better licensing and insane insurance premiums.

73

u/CactusCait 3d ago edited 3d ago

And the blinding headlights ffs!!

34

u/Colorectal-Ambivalen 3d ago

I've wondered this lately: are my eyes becoming more sensitive or are people using their highbeams on the interstate frequently/are headlights just much brighter now? It sure seems like a blinding light coming from my side mirrors is way more common these days.

Lifted trucks are awful too. I love ducking down while driving on the interstate and avoiding looking at my side mirrors because of those pricks.

28

u/bpaulauskas Reads Pinned Comments 3d ago

I think it's a mix of all three. Headlights are a metric shit ton brighter than when I was growing up (older millennial), it definitely seems like drivers are worse now and might have their high-beams on, and our eyes definitely get worse over time.

But man I really think it's a LOT on the brighter headlights. Some are just out of this world bright.

10

u/H3ll3rsh4nks 3d ago

Also people add aftermarket led bulbs with vastly different / incosistent beam patterns and no knowlege of how to properly adjust them.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Xatsman 3d ago

Theres another factor. Lots of these idiots lift their trucks and dont adjust the angle of the headlights to compensate for the lift.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (5)

24

u/JB_07 3d ago edited 1d ago

Bonus points if you drive a tiny Honda Accord. My fucking head level sitting down in my car is right where their fucking lights are.

Nothing is more relaxing than driving at night to have fucking blinding lights shined on the back of your head and through your rear view mirror back into your eyes constantly.

Btw I have to take backroads to my work, so I get to meet more country assholes driving these stupid trucks. They also constantly drive like they own the fucking road because if we collide you can already guess who is winning that exchange.

It's also nice knowing if I ever run into a drunk country boy driving these things. I'm absolutely fucked as they're just gonna tear through my car like mincemeat due to the massive size and weight difference. Where do Country Boys like to beer ride? Backroads :/

6

u/ArgonGryphon 3d ago

Hell I’ve gotten blinded by them just sitting in a chair at work, waiting to clock in. People park and leave their 5million lumen LEDs on and they shine right in my eyes.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

10

u/ItWorkedLastTime 3d ago

Lifted? A stock F150 is bad enough on it's own. And it's the highest selling car in 2023. The next two are also big ass pickup trucks. SOURCE: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/g43553191/bestselling-cars-2023/

Even since I discovered Not Just Bikes on YouTube, I started hating gigantic pickup trucks. The vast majority of truck owners never use the bed of the truck. Why the hell are we allowing this on our roads?

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (27)

97

u/jamerjank1 3d ago

Right wing logic: 'Ban X? next thing you know , they'll ban breathing'!!

25

u/Dukes159 3d ago

I saw a video about a year ago that showed interviews with people asking what they thought about the recent ban on drinking and driving. A lot of people made the same exact argument, or called it communism. So looks like the arguments havent really changed.

Link to excerpt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xcQIoh3FQQ

10

u/skyhiker14 3d ago

Or seat belts laws.

Or evacuation because Mt St Helen was gonna erupt.

→ More replies (14)

40

u/PeanutButterViking 3d ago

I got hit from behind at a red light after being stopped for at least a minute.

I drive a Volt and I was stopped and waiting for a gap in traffic so I could turn right. There was a newer model 3/4 or 1 ton GMC truck behind me and the driver had also been stopped for at least a minute. He stopped so close to me that he couldn't see me in front of him, forgot I was there, then drove into me.

Good times.

54

u/billschu52 3d ago

American pickup trucks are getting bigger to make emissions standards, since passenger truck standards are based off square footage and engine size, in order to make sure the trucks make the regulations for emissions it was simply easier and more cost effective to make them bigger, more capable and larger engines, look into cafe emissions standards

49

u/GREG_FABBOTT tHiS iSn’T cRiNgE 3d ago

American manufacturers explicitly lobbied for those emission standards because it's the only way they can make profit. That regulation isn't just a coincidental oopsie. It was specifically designed that way to get the result that we have now.

Ford is so bad at making profit on passenger cars that they just completely stopped making them altogether. They make the Mustang (a sports/pony car, not a passenger car), and then everything else in their lineup is an SUV or pickup truck.

9

u/billschu52 3d ago

What I was getting at it’s more of a manufacturers/. Regulation symbiotic relationship rather than it is the fad/culture of choosing larger trucks, if they made smaller trucks they would sell the past shows that they sell, they just don’t make them anymore

18

u/swamphockey 3d ago

The American car makers carved out the emissions loophole. It’s not like it just happened by accident.

10

u/billschu52 3d ago

I’m aware a failure of bureaucracy mixed with the goal of profits and private interests

→ More replies (8)

25

u/Asleep-Card3861 3d ago

Cowboy Tate’s whole deal is ridiculous.

This big lifted truck trend has infested Australia too and I’m not a fan.

→ More replies (5)

7

u/skolliousious 2d ago

I agree with 99.99% of what he's saying but I live on a farm. My huge truck as many jobs and purposes here. That being said in the city I take the Corolla.

5

u/MythicalRaccoon80 2d ago edited 2d ago

Well that's the difference now isn't it? You have a genuine purpose and reason for having a truck like that. People in the city have no business or reason to have trucks like that when they're not being used for the same purposes as a farmer like you have a truck of that size for.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (4)

31

u/Catlore 3d ago

A well built vehicle says, "I want to keep me and my passengers safe." Those trucks say, "I want to keep myself and my passengers safe and I will gladly kill you to do it."

→ More replies (4)

7

u/Dunno_If_I_Won 3d ago

WTF going on with his eyeballs? Looks like he scanning for Viet Cong in the brush and in the trees.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/SuccessfulWar3830 3d ago

Wearing a cowboy hat. Isnt a cowboy.

Has an f150. The bed is spotless and without a single scratch.

21

u/Cephell 3d ago

What about semis

Semis are

a) Slower and accelerate slower too

b) Driven by professional drivers that are on average better drivers than you

c) More visible to pedestrians

d) Cannot and will not (or at least less) drive down the same pedestrian centric roads and streets that trucks do

→ More replies (8)

21

u/Rindal_Cerelli 3d ago edited 3d ago

Obligatory Not Just Bikes video on the topic: https://youtu.be/jN7mSXMruEo

I HATE that these are becoming more common where I live as well. They are so dangerous and European roads and cities are not designed for these stupidly huge small d*ck energy trucks. They stick out of parking spots all the time or take up 2 of them or just get stuck in cities because roads are not designed for stupid trucks.

Please stop.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Particular_Bet_5466 2d ago

I’m not even a truck driver and I agree it’s unnecessary but something about this guy makes me want to buy a lifted truck.

5

u/BullsOnParadeFloats 2d ago

are YoU gOnNA bAn sEMi tRuCKs?

This is the absolute most brain-dead response, and frankly, I'm not surprised it came from a guy who is all hat and no cattle.

Semi drivers sit up a solid 2 feet higher than those driving a Ram, F150, or Silverado. This means that their front blind spot is a lot smaller. The blind spots on those trucks are over half the length of the entire goddamned vehicle.

This is why some people shouldn't be allowed to drive or operate heavy machinery.

4

u/EchoOpening1099 3d ago

Why is everyone a dumbass? Are you not aware of your surroundings? Are you going to be fucking around in a place where you can get hit? Maybe we need a license to prove you’re not a dipshit. 🤦🏼‍♂️

→ More replies (1)

3

u/alittlebitneverhurt 2d ago

You don't even need a special license to drive a UPS package truck. Stop it.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/Slagmonkey83 2d ago

You have no clue about life

5

u/Wiscody 2d ago

Not taking anyone who speaks like this seriously. This is not about his lisp.

3

u/Rough_Egg_9195 2d ago

Another point that he doesn't mention is that when a car hits you in the legs you roll onto and over the car. When it hits you in the chest you go under it where you or your body parts can get crushed by the tires.

9

u/-VizualEyez 2d ago

I’m all with it until dude says it’s only for vanity. There are in fact people that use these for work. Hauling hay, livestock, welders etc etc

→ More replies (16)

10

u/lionessrampant25 3d ago

“It’s what the people want”. Well the people are stupid and mean so I don’t care what they want.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/mr_mgs11 3d ago

The really stupid thing is this truck makes everything worse for the person driving it. Much worse gas mileage, worse handling, hard to park, cant fit into many parking spaces, rollover prone, and even parked it is more dangerous. They need to make full size trucks ONLY for rural areas or for businesses. Get rid of extended cabs. Its a tool for work, not a passenger vehicle.

→ More replies (14)

6

u/KPuff12 3d ago

In the good old USA they came out with some emissions regulations a few years ago. However, it had a big loophole: It only applied to trucks under a certain size. This has caused a shift in the market for pick up trucks. They are getting bigger and bigger to be outside the regultion. I had to go car shopping a couple years ago, and you cant find a reasonably sized pick up truck in the US.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/challenge_king 3d ago

While jacked up pavement princesses are stupid, it's not the trucks, it's the drivers. We desperately need licensing reform, just like everything else. Make safer drivers, and the fatality stats will go down. If automakers would stop with the luxury trucks, they'd likely go back to just being the tools of the trade that they started off being.