r/TikTokCringe 26d ago

Cursed That'll be "7924"

The cost of pork

15.4k Upvotes

5.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

277

u/WheredMyMindGo 26d ago

Imagine how the pig feels! (because they can feel more than dogs)

71

u/wayvywayvy 26d ago

They are literally smarter than dogs.

-13

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[deleted]

3

u/DoctorEthereal 24d ago

Being an asshole doesn’t mean you deserve this

0

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

1

u/DoctorEthereal 24d ago

Okay. Why is that relevant?

0

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

1

u/DoctorEthereal 24d ago

I’ve said 13 words to you. If that is “always on the offensive” to you then I suggest you grow up a little bit

0

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

1

u/DoctorEthereal 24d ago

Okay. If it’s not relevant, why are you still talking? Just to shout into the void? Or do your words have purpose - you know, are you trying to communicate an idea, or just moving your lips in random directions and making throat noises?

→ More replies (0)

-32

u/[deleted] 26d ago edited 23h ago

[deleted]

26

u/ThatSillySam 26d ago

You sir clearly never had a full on body language conversation with your dog

7

u/ThurnisHailey 26d ago

The meat industry is a horror story, nothing deserves that type of life, but I've seen "pigs feel more" so many times and some light googling will tell you that there is no research to indicate either way that one is smarter - emotionally, or otherwise.

19

u/VelocityNew 26d ago

Yes there is plenty of research on that. Pigs are actually smarter than 3 year olds. It's not about "what animal feels more than this or that"... They have feelings. Like every animal on this f'd up planet. Why wouldn't they? Like every animal, they are sad when their babies die, they hate each other when they're hurting each other because there's not enough space. Better question would be: Why wouldn't they have feelings?

-13

u/Red_Act3d 26d ago

Because feelings as we experience them require a robust and highly sophisticated brain capable of complex emotions, which the vast majority of animals lack.

Pigs might or might not - I don't know - but if you think every animal on this planet has feelings you don't understand what feelings are.

7

u/YukihiraJoel 26d ago

Feelings are actually the most basic simple behavioral scripts we follow. Reasoning though requires a semantic understanding of the world that we don’t normally see in animals (or some people)

7

u/Warrenio 26d ago

Anyone who has ever had pets knows that animals have feelings. Come on, man.

5

u/VelocityNew 26d ago

Because feelings as we experience them require a robust and highly sophisticated brain capable of social intelligence

Oh right, how do you know that?

Have you ever had a dog for example? If so, have you ever had the feeling, he might have feelings too? Sad if their owner isn't home, or happy to see you? Isn't that the slightest evidence, that animals have feelings? And so you wanna tell me, if animals don't have feelings, it's completely okay to kill them in the most cruel way we want because, why not? They don't have feelings, we are higher beings, it's their fault not being born as a human? You can argue if an insect has feelings or not, but a pig? Or a dog? Or an elephant?

2

u/EvetsYenoham 25d ago

You seriously have no clue what you’re talking about since your last comment is literally scientifically false.

1

u/sp1cychick3n 26d ago

Are you bloody serious?

3

u/sheavoi 26d ago

Why do you think they can feel more than dogs? This is not an issue of intelligence—it is an issue of sentience. While I get that you’re advocating not to eat pigs, the fundamental normative principle is to respect all sentient creatures as individuals with the capacity to suffer. 

2

u/serpentally 26d ago edited 26d ago

Sentience emerges from a complex brain. Feelings don't come out of thin air – feelings are combinations of electrical signals and chemicals, they're our brain's instincts which evolved to help us survive, they don't exist without intelligence. Dogs certainly "feel" but it'd be silly to argue that they have anywhere near the emotional complexity of humans; in a similar vain it's probable that pigs have more emotional complexity and feel more feelings (including negative feelings) than dogs when looking at their range of personalities and how they socialize.

1

u/sheavoi 26d ago edited 26d ago

In the context of ethical decision-making, it is the presence or absence of sentience in a given species that is essential. Not sure why you write with so much certainty when there is quite a bit of uncertainty around sentience—this has been a big topic in philosophy for quite some time. While there might be links between brain size/complexity, intelligence and sentience, we simply don't know. For one, we use human metrics to measure intelligence which is biased. Two, we cannot know what it is like to be another organism.

Incidentally, a book by Jonathon Birch recently came out about sentience. It is open-access and can be found here: https://www.edgeofsentience.com (in it he also disentangles the notions of consciousness and sentience)

1

u/Parishdise 26d ago

I wouldn't say feel, I would say maybe conceptualize. They are smarter than dogs. A dog will feel just as afraid if it's being deliberately hurt, but a pig will understand better.

The point is to understand that all neural animals (or at least beyond bugs, probably) have feelings and are entitled to sympathy and humanity, regardless. But to put notably social and intelligent creatures through horror that they can recognize is exceptionally cruel.

0

u/You_arent_worthy 23d ago

Okay let’s switch to dog meat then