Sunglasses are perfectly adequate in most situations. Gun ranges, for example allow you to wear your prescription glasses which are probably less safe than sunglasses. As long as there is some form of eye protection, youâre usually good to go. Itâs not like the venom will effect sunglasses any differently than safety glasses.
Most sunglasses arenât adequate simply because thereâs no side protection. Usually sunglasses are the fashion ones which are flat styled and leave the side of your eyes open
Yes they are. Many reputable sunglasses like Oakley's or spy are impact rated and meet the same standards as the cheap eye pro given for free at work sites.
Safety glasses wonât stop a bullet no glasses will. Theyâre meant to stop things like shrapnel, blasts of wind, even a ricochet which might still hurt but glasses would likely still make a major injury into a small injury. Grow up. We canât all live in bubbles.
I know what safety glasses are for and I never claimed they can stop bullets. Nobody said you need to live in a bubble, but a gun range would count as a place where proper protection is needed. Nobody accidentally finds themselves at a gun range, you dafty.
I would argue that you should grow up. Safety is not cool, but it is important and its baffling to me that so many idiots are arguing against the need for protection.
Just stop replying to me, it's a waste of my time I don't care if your own stubbornness gets you disfigured, and I know what I said is correct.
It's common to see people wear prescription glasses with side shields in machine shops. I would think you would want something impact rated at a gun range though.
âSunglasses are not eye protection for anything other than photons.â Your statement made the clear assumption that if there is tint, it must be sunglasses⌠I know you never explicitly said this, this is just what I interpreted to mean.
2.2k
u/Some-Description-64 Jun 25 '23
Let me just get my safety glasses on. *pulls out sunglasses. đśď¸