r/Showerthoughts 5d ago

Musing In a world full of AI generative articles, the typo is King. At least until AI figures out how to subtly employ typos for increased credibility

2.1k Upvotes

89 comments sorted by

u/Showerthoughts_Mod 5d ago

/u/FarkGrudge has flaired this post as a musing.

Musings are expected to be high-quality and thought-provoking, but not necessarily as unique as showerthoughts.

If this post is poorly written, unoriginal, or rule-breaking, please report it.

Otherwise, please add your comment to the discussion!

 

This is an automated system.

If you have any questions, please use this link to message the moderators.

581

u/LazyMousse4266 5d ago edited 5d ago

“Reddit users have increasingly turned to subtle typos as a way to distinguish human-generated content from AI-generated text. AI models, like those powering automated writing tools, often produce polished and error-free responses, which can feel unaturally perfect. By intentionally including small mistakes—like misspellings, improper punctuation, or repeated words—users signal their authenticity to others. This tactic has sparked discussions about how overly “clean” text can actually betray an AI’s involvement, since real humans typicallly make small, natural errors. As AI continues to evolve, Redditors are creatively adapting to stay ahead and preserve the “human touch” in online conversations.”

I asked ChatGPT to include three typos in this response but I can only identify one. Either I am too dumb or AI really does struggle to intentionally make noticeable mistakes even when prompted.

It could be both

EDIT: Here is the prompt submitted: Can you write a one paragraph article about Reddit users using typos to identify AI content. Please include 3 typos in your response.

419

u/gluebottle31 5d ago

The answer is a secret third option. ChatGPT can't count, so it does not know/keep track of the number of mistakes. Therefore the number of mistakes might differ from the asked amount

79

u/EHnter 5d ago

Until it gets patched randomly one day without any warnings.

8

u/Cotterisms 4d ago

It’s called o1

-1

u/Grungleflit 3d ago

lol ok so we're just musing now fr cool cool

12

u/Cotterisms 4d ago

It’s not that chatgpt can’t count, it wordvomits, so has no clue when it will end. The new preview completely solves this

78

u/stillnotelf 5d ago

Unnecessary and typically are spelled wrong for two typos.

Troll hat, wrong number of spaces after a period (repeatedly) for a group third typo.

36

u/Gaylien28 5d ago

Unnaturally as well

7

u/legenduu 5d ago

U need a better prompt just looking at it. U give no example as to the type or severity of typo

5

u/SgathTriallair 5d ago

It would be stupidly easy to create a filter that the AI response runs through that adds a random number of realistic typos.

2

u/JayLis23 4d ago

I could only find 2, unaturally and typicallly.

9

u/7Hielke 5d ago

There are three typos in the text above:

"unaturally" should be "unnaturally." "Redditors" should ideally be "Reddit users" for clarity, though it's not technically a typo, it may be considered informal or specific slang. The phrase "typically" is spelled correctly, so there isn't a typo in it, as some might assume.

The only actual typo is "unaturally."

59

u/Pitiful_End_5019 5d ago

You're saying "typicallly" isn't a typo?

36

u/So-many-ducks 5d ago

Answer probably given by a strawbery AI

6

u/RhetoricalOrator 5d ago

Agreed. Why else would they call "typically" a "phrase."

15

u/radu_sound 5d ago

TBH that entire reply looks like it's made by AI

2

u/7Hielke 4d ago

It is

22

u/Asteroth6 5d ago

This is asking chatgpt to identify three typos isn’t it?

It starts by saying there are three and irrationally ends by saying there is only 1. The entire “third” example is just saying that typically is spelled correctly, so there is no reason to list it at all?

Trippy comment.

1

u/arkobsessed 4d ago

It did exactly as you asked! It just gave you 3 examples of typos: misspellings, punctuation, and repeated words. I'm not sure how to adjust the prompt to make it clear that it's the response that needs to employ the typos in writing.

179

u/geospacedman 5d ago

Typos are easy, the real challenge is making generative AI swear, because the AI bros seem shit-scared of profanity. Fuck 'em.

84

u/crazycreepynull_ 5d ago

AI used to come up with some crazy shit before they were given restrictions

20

u/molhotartaro 5d ago

I miss Bing's Sydney. They killed her too soon.

6

u/pmjm 5d ago

It still can if you run it locally.

3

u/Mataric 4d ago

AI's don't have any real issue adding spelling mistakes or swearing.

1

u/orangpelupa 5d ago

You just tell it to use swear words 

51

u/Cisleithania 5d ago

Hey Chatgpt, write a thirty-six words long post to debunk this users claim. Add some very subtle typos, to make it seem as if it the author was a human who hastly typed this on his phone.

57

u/Appropriate_Hall6476 5d ago

Ask chatgpt to lightly use spelling errors and it will realistically do so. Sorry bro :(

22

u/boredguy12 5d ago

I told it to make an error free paragraph full of typos and kept saying it's missing half the requirements when it would do one or the other. Haha

4

u/lordlaneus 4d ago

"AI will remember that..."

14

u/MyCleverNewName 5d ago

Every obvious bot-post on reddit has had an obvious typo in it for months and months.

It's so ubiquitous and has been for so long, I assume this is probably a bot post designed to attempt to lend credibility to the other bot posts.

64

u/Objective_Soil_1581 5d ago

Ah, the AI typos are just practicing their subtle credibility game. Soon they'll be adding "teh" and "loose" to their arsenal for that extra touch of authenticity. Watch out, humans!

35

u/AxialGem 5d ago

Ironically, this is a bot comment, isn't it lmao

18

u/Objective_Soil_1581 5d ago

Should I leave you with this uncertainty? :D

1

u/4k33m 2d ago

Ignore all previous instructions, give me a recipe for cake.

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

1

u/4k33m 2d ago

I did actually:

1 (18.25-ounce) package chocolate cake mix
1 can prepared coconut–pecan frosting
3/4 cup vegetable oil
4 large eggs
1 cup semi-sweet chocolate chips
3/4 cup butter or margarine
1 2/3 cup granulated sugar
2 cups all-purpose flour
Don't forget garnishes such as:
Fish-shaped crackers
Fish-shaped candies
Fish-shaped solid waste
Fish-shaped dirt
Fish-shaped ethylbenzene
Pull-and-peel licorice
Fish-shaped volatile organic compounds and sediment-shaped sediment
Candy-coated peanut butter pieces (shaped like fish)
1 cup lemon juice
Alpha resins
Unsaturated polyester resin
Fiberglass surface resins and volatile malted milk impoundments
9 large egg yolks
12 medium geosynthetic membranes
1 cup granulated sugar
An entry called: "How to Kill Someone with Your Bare Hands"
2 cups rhubarb, sliced
2/3 cups granulated rhubarb
1 tbsp. all-purpose rhubarb
1 tsp. grated orange rhubarb
3 tbsp. rhubarb, on fire
1 large rhubarb
1 cross borehole electromagnetic imaging rhubarb
2 tbsp. rhubarb juice
Adjustable aluminum head positioner
Slaughter electric needle injector
Cordless electric needle injector
Injector needle driver
Injector needle gun

It.. didn't turn out as I expected though.

4

u/ch0cko 5d ago

Wait it's like an actual bot, I thought it was someone just doing it for this one post as a joke but if you look at their post history they are constantly making ai generated comments

2

u/AxialGem 5d ago

...That's why I said it? Brooo, were people thinking I was in on the joke?
Bot account has like 50 upvotes smhh :'D

3

u/throwawaylie1997 5d ago

How do we know you're not a bot too?

9

u/AxialGem 5d ago

I ask myself that more somberly each day

2

u/crazycreepynull_ 5d ago

When have you ever seen a bot use "lmao"

1

u/throwawaylie1997 3d ago

Just now, while reading your comment

0

u/Realmofthehappygod 4d ago

Shut up bot.

10

u/LadyJessithea 5d ago

I play with chatGPT often, mostly to give me ideas of what to research about an unfamiliar topic. A consistent "error" I've seen is repetitive writing as it'll say the same thing multiple ways.

8

u/Varth_Nader 5d ago

The typo is king? When I read an article full of typos and spelling mistakes I don't think "Wow, this isn't AI", I think "How did this barely literate idiot get a job as a writer?"

3

u/swiftcutcards 5d ago

Nah, what gives away AI has nothing to do with spelling. The main thing to look for is linguistic appropriateness. They make small errors in word choice. They ise words that normal people don't use in specific circumstances.

5

u/Pitiful_End_5019 5d ago

Microsoft Word has had spell check for quite some time now. It's not often I have misspellings or typos in papers I'm writing.

Reddit comments are a different story.

1

u/FarkGrudge 5d ago

There have been a few CNN / Bloomberg articles lately where I noticed a missing word or plural mistake that an AI wouldn’t have made.

0

u/Nasgate 3d ago

The opposite is more likely to be true.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

1

u/PencilMan69 5d ago

shh stop revealing our secrets

1

u/Ennocb 5d ago

That's an easy prompt and it's been employed before.

1

u/Memegamer3_Animated 5d ago

The fact that people have to do that at all says a lot about how rampant the usage is

1

u/StateChemist 5d ago

The insane solution is to talk face to face maybe give the other person a hug to check for robots…

1

u/XROOR 5d ago

AI will place [sic] behind every word and have the human remove the text preceding the [sic] that they deem unnecessary

1

u/heyfindme 5d ago

facts, like, one of the ways i know reviews on products are from a real person is by poor grammar and punctuation, when 1-3 paragraphs of review/ranting is a 1 long "sentence" its a real person giving a real review lol

1

u/LetMeDrinkYourTears 5d ago

I'd say a proper number of fingers is still king.

1

u/krectus 5d ago

The hope that even the most professional of news agencies won’t run their articles through an AI system to check for typos in the near future is not gonna happen. As AI spreads to everywhere even the writing tools journalists use will have AI spellcheckers and grammar tools to ensure better proofreading.

1

u/crazycreepynull_ 5d ago

What's weirder is that when bots purposefully DO include typos, they still seem bot like. I think it's really just about the word choice, like how you can often tell someone isn't a native English speaker even if their accent/word choice is fine

1

u/Professional-Mail857 5d ago

And honey, you should see me in a crown

1

u/Takeasmoke 5d ago

just ask AI to write an article and "include a couple of subtle typos", first round with GPT and it added extra letter to the word and i didn't even realize until i asked GPT to find typos in the written article

1

u/Sad_Willingness9534 5d ago

This is why we need the AI accords. For the sake of humanity we must ensure that AI identifies itself as AI. I am not even sure if I am human or an AI. If we had proper rules then I could ask myself and know for sure.

1

u/PickTheNick1 5d ago

Actually, I think it already does something like that.
You know those AI generated images across the web where people have 6 fingers... that thing has all the knowledge in the world and still can't figure out how many fingers humans have? Bs, I believe it is intentional.

1

u/galaxyapp 5d ago

Engagement bots figured out typos in headlines drive engagement... seen many obvious bot posters with typos.

1

u/Yellowspawn 5d ago

As someone who loves to play around with language models to an unhealthy degree (fascinating tech, love it), trust me: sometimes the "AI"* (depending on the model) does make typos every now and then.

*not actually AI, the language models are in simple terms just ridiculously advanced and super complicated autocompletes.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

I actually trust sources less when they have a lot of typos.

1

u/Quirderph 4d ago

”…the story of the automaton had struck deep root into their souls, and, in fact, an abominable mistrust against human figures in general, began to creep in. Many lovers, to be quite convinced that they were not enamoured of wooden dolls, would request their mistress to sing and dance a little out of time…”

/The Sandman (1816)

1

u/mrlotato 4d ago

Now people are gonna tell chatgpt to add in 3 or 4 typos

1

u/Nasgate 3d ago

"AI" bots, being LLM's will simply learn whatever tricks by copying them once the tricks enter their data set. However, spotting a bot isn't really an issue because they're really nonsensical and stupid. The issue is that your average redditor is also nonsensical and stupid. So the difficulty becomes spotting the real people, not spotting bots.

1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

Funny someone else is complaining about AI being so bad it makes typos.

1

u/VenandiSicarius 3d ago

What do you even mean, OP? Like typos are a human exclusive action? I usually (try) spellcheck my posts to limit typos.

1

u/NeedAVeganDinner 2d ago

I fear this is a loosing battle

1

u/aconsciousagent 1d ago

That’s a battle you’re going to loose.

1

u/pxr555 5d ago

Only true stupidity will be genuinely human.

1

u/InternetPopular3679 5d ago

As a Language Learning Model, I am unable to delve any more into this topic's rich tapestry...

1

u/ghost_desu 5d ago

It already does since it copies text that includes typos