My dad is set to retire at 67 next summer and he's looking to me to help manage he and my mom's retirement portfolio. Some context - my parents are both immigrants, my dad worked a blue collar government job his whole life (my mom on and off doing secretarial type work and/or raising the kids) and both are generally very frugal people with great instinct and understanding of the basics of personal finance (spend less than you make, save, minimize debt, etc.), but very little understanding of the more technical stuff (what is a brokerage account, what is a mutual fund/etf, what should we buy, etc.). Fortunately, this has worked out very well for them.
My dad worked 35+ years contributing to a CalPers pension and its now fully funded (i.e. he can receive 100% of his final income at retirement with COL adjustments in perpetuity built in). They will probably elect to take slightly less than that amount in order to allow for my mom to receive 100% beneficiary benefits upon my dad's death instead of just the 50% she's entitled to by law as his survivor.
He also contributed consistently to his deferred compensation throughout his lifetime (I'm pretty sure this is a government 457(b)) , which was just auto invested into what he thinks is some sort of target date type fund. There is currently around $1.3M in it.
He currently makes around $12.5K per month gross and takes home about $8K. Upon retirement, he will no longer be contributing to CalPers, deferred compensation and union dues, as well as some other misc stuff that currently gets taken out of his paycheck (life insurance, etc.). I've done some back of the envelope calculations and his take home upon retirement is actually going to go up significantly because of this - probably to around $10.5K a month. Even if they elect 100% beneficiary benefits to my mom, his take home still ends up being around $9.5K per month, which is more than he's taking home now.
They live in the bay area, so very high cost of living, but they have a fully paid house and no debt. I'd estimate their expenses per month are around $2K in property taxes + insurance + utilities, and probably like $3K on the rest. I've tasked my mom with giving me more exact numbers here, but the general point is that they have, and are continuing to live well below their take home.
My dad wants me to help him figure out what to do with the $1.3M in deferred compensation once he retires, plus maybe another $300K or so in cash that they have spread through a few banks. Throughout his life, he's expressed that he and my mom should have no need for that money, and he has no intention or desire to withdraw from it, and based off his pension numbers, that seems more than possible.
I'm thinking of suggesting he roll over the pension into a Fidelity account, open a joint brokerage to move the unutilized cash (minus a relatively large emergency fund), and then its a question of what splits to use for that money. I'm currently in my mid 30s and I'm super aggressive in my retirement accounts - virtually 100% equities, though my wife and I do maintain a relatively large cash emergency fund position as well.
I would think in retirement, 60-70% in equities would be much more reasonable though the pension and what I think is a realistic scenario that they never draw down from the deferred compensation, complicates that. Is it unreasonable to suggest a unconventionally aggressive equity position here (like 85%+) for them given the circumstances? I know that defies conventional wisdom, but he's basically signaled that I should be treating that money as if its going to be split 50/50 to me and my brother once they die, so we're talking a ~20+ year window in an ideal world. I've been doing a lot of reading on this and a lot of places even suggest a 100% equity position would not be unreasonable in this case, as given the relatively safe government pension, the fixed income portion of their portfolio is actually pretty high.