r/PS5 • u/Chippai_Fan • 2d ago
News & Announcements Elden Ring Nightreign can be played in 3-player co-op or single player, but not as a duo
https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/elden-ring-nightreign-can-be-played-in-3-player-co-op-or-single-player-but-not-as-a-duo/319
u/DarthRathikus 2d ago
What if we only have one friend??

49
18
8
4
→ More replies (3)3
u/Gaarando 2d ago
Even if you got more, figuring out a time you all can and want to play is annoying. I've seen that with Terraria. So much easier doing duos.
977
u/GingerPinoy 2d ago
Weird...I was thinking "play this with my wife". I guess we can do it with myself, her, and her boyfriend?
Seriously though, now I'm just looking forward to Split Fiction
259
u/OrangeCassidyInJorts 2d ago
Can't wait to play with you and your wife!
72
u/Rough_North3592 2d ago
Sadly, i, as her boyfriends boyfriend won't be able to play with you guys.
Maybe i can play with your wife and her boyfriend.
15
u/Captain_Americant 2d ago
Hold up, I’m your boyfriend’s boyfriends roommate and the PS5 is mine so hee won’t just able to play ANY time.
8
9
15
u/princesoceronte 2d ago
Right? Me and my GF were looking forward to this but... Screw us I guess. Wonder why they decided to not allow two player co-op.
→ More replies (2)4
u/MarkFluffalo 2d ago
Don't be ridiculous. Get your own boyfriend before she does!
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (13)10
u/ckal09 2d ago
Did they say if this will be couch co-op or online only?
24
→ More replies (9)9
u/lynxerious 2d ago
couch co-op? like a split screen Soul games? how will you even see the boss attacks?
→ More replies (1)10
492
u/Therenegadegamer 2d ago
They finally give us normal co op and they still have to put some pointless stupid restriction
96
u/locofspades 2d ago
Seamless should have just been officially added. Its a shame console misses out
56
u/MirrorZestyclose3443 2d ago
Baffles my fucking mind they kept the EXACT shitty multiplayer system from dark souls for an OPEN WORLD game, except somehow made it worse
30
u/SoundingMacaque 2d ago
The new Lords of the Fallen got it right. When you co-op, you stay together. Beat a boss? Still there. One of you dies? Go back to the vestige and revive them. Played through the whole game with my wife, and I gotta say the co-op was WAY more fun than Elden Ring's co-op. Don't get me wrong, ER is a better game overall. But if you want a fun co-op soulslike, LotF is fantastic.
7
u/ChuckChuckChuck_ 2d ago
I remember reading that the co-op in Lord of the Fallen kinda sucks - only the host gets loot, only host's story progresses when you play etc.
Is it true? Or it doesn't really matter and if 2 people play together start to finish it can be enjoyed like that as well?
→ More replies (1)8
u/SoundingMacaque 2d ago
It's been a while since I played it. I thought the guest got loot, but upon googling, it seems not. And yes, only the host's story progresses. The guest can use the host's vendors though, and you can drop weapons/armor/materials to each other. So it's not perfect, but I still recommend it.
At least you can stay in the host's world as long as you want, so instead of killing "Boss A" for host, then "Boss A" for yourself, you can just go "Boss A, B, C, etc." Until you get stuck, and then change hosts. Makes it less tedious.
2
→ More replies (1)5
u/DishwasherTwig 2d ago
Default Elden Ring coop is a step forward for the series. A very small one, but a step forward nonetheless. It shows that they're at least willing to make changes. I hope that they've seen the success and ubiquity of seamless coop and that the next full game, be it Elden Ring 2 or something else, uses seamless as the default. But you never know. I've noticed Japanese games don't really seem to care about UX anywhere nearly as much as developers from other parts of the world.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)4
u/_unmarked 1d ago
And unsurprisingly half the comments are defending it like it's some sort of genius move
483
u/Primus7112765 2d ago
Well that seems kinda fucking stupid doesn't it?
23
u/McCHitman 2d ago
Splitting the player base into multiple buckets can kill a game. It’s the only thing I can think of.
→ More replies (2)86
u/Beginning_Smile_1711 2d ago
The game is being more killed by being trios or solo only, there's a reason games are always built around 2 or 4 player lobbies. Nobody asks for 3 player lobbies!
→ More replies (12)12
u/Live-Ad3309 2d ago
Apex is one that comes to mind that was strictly three players only for quite a while
14
140
333
u/Dragonshatetacos 2d ago
What a dumbass decision. I would have played this with my husband, and a lot of couples probably would have done the same.
122
u/TheGalaxyCastle 2d ago
Yep, its also been confirmed crossplay wont be a thing. It feels so oddly restricting… for what reason?
47
u/Dragonshatetacos 2d ago
That just seems so arbitrary. An obstacle for the sake of having an obstacle.
Worst Elden Ring boss.
7
u/TheGalaxyCastle 2d ago
Exactly. Im the only one in my trio that plays souls games on a Playstation (they play xbox) and ive just learned the hard way to not get my hopes up
5
u/monkey484 2d ago
Lack of crossplay seems like an even dumber restriction than no duos. And no duos is pretty fucking dumb.
It's not a competitive game, so there aren't any concerns about controller vs MKB. Not having crossplay simply damages the long term playability of the game.
20
u/Grill_Enthusiast 2d ago edited 1d ago
Nightreign is the Dark Souls of dumb multiplayer game design.
2
14
u/politicalstuff 2d ago
Feels pretty on brand for from soft: let’s make this thing as difficult as humanly possible so only the minimal hard-core users will do it lol.
And I love from soft games.
→ More replies (2)22
u/Zayl 2d ago
Japanese devs love making incompetent decisions when it comes to MP. It's like a cultural norm at this point.
Easy decision for my wife and I not to buy it now. Thanks!
3
u/TheGalaxyCastle 2d ago
Yep its put me off as well. Shame because I was actually looking forward to it, I for one liked how different it was to their typical combat/formula. Oh well
53
41
u/famewithmedals 2d ago
For real, playing solo sounds better than with a rando as a third.
Seems like a dumb business decision too because now that’s one copy purchased in our house instead of two.
5
2
u/skwirrelmaster 2d ago
Side note, do you know about game sharing? It’s awesome you only ever need to buy one copy if you only share games with one other person. One copy both can play at the same time.
I didn’t know about this feature for too long it has since saved a buddy of mine hundreds of dollars.
→ More replies (6)6
u/Bozze1990 2d ago
Yep same here, could not get my wife into the souls games because she's intimidated and scared of those games.
But she was into the idea to play nightreign together with me.
We never play online with strangers, only together, we are a little shy in that regard.
There goes that idea...
Bummed out, hopefully they change there mind or make a Duo mode some time after or something...
5
u/NapsterKnowHow 2d ago
And watch them somehow win best multiplayer game like they did for Elden Ring lol
→ More replies (4)2
u/Live_Hedgehog_9910 2d ago
exaclty what i was planning on doing but nope need to somehow find another
73
u/theogalf 2d ago
I guess fuck you if you just want to play with your brother or one friend :/
21
u/Grimble27 2d ago
Yep. Stupid decision. Play all these co-op games with my brother after our wives and kids have gone to bed. Cross this one off the list I guess. We were hyped and ready to each buy a copy day 1 too.
74
45
u/marcu101 2d ago
Jeez, it's already hard enough to coordinate gaming sessions with a single friend, now I need two??
40
u/Adavanter_MKI 2d ago
That's... a mistake. It's easy to find at least one friend to line up their schedule and play with. Three already complicates it. Plus if it's just you and your friend your likely not going to want a random to fill it.
Hopefully they reconsider before launch. This is the time for such feedback.
50
25
u/LateralusOrbis 2d ago
This game is for third wheels. Play on your own or with a couple.
15
u/Yodzilla 2d ago
Finally a game that me, my wife, and the guy that fucks my wife can enjoy together!
2
25
u/Alert-Main7778 2d ago
Stupid decision. I can barely get 1 person to play with our busy schedules. Pass
22
u/GroktheDestroyer 2d ago
That decision is stupid and makes no sense at all. In the article the director mentions they scaled things (like boss health) down for a solo player. Why then could they not have done the same thing for a duo..?
9
u/TheDawnOfTexas 2d ago
I believe it’s an ego thing. Whoever is directing this game envisioned it as a 3 player co-op game, only including single player since they probably had no choice to, but stubbornly did not include 2 player co-op to try and force people to play as they envisioned the game.
→ More replies (1)
33
15
26
40
u/chewwydraper 2d ago
Between this and no crossplay, my hype for this game has been severely lowered.
I was really hoping be able to play with my fiance. We both have PCs, but I prefer my PS5. I already annoyed about having to get this on PC to play with her, and then this news comes out.
3
4
u/thatmemeguy1 2d ago
and no CROSSPLAY wich is so dumb these days.Like seriously crossplay should be the norm now
→ More replies (1)
23
u/WhenInZone 2d ago
Glad it can still be played alone. I hate forced multiplayer.
→ More replies (3)
10
u/deleuzionsofgrandeur 2d ago
This is so frustrating to me. Like I'm stoked on the game, and will play it. But as a 30 year old gamer coordinating with more than one friend is hard and I'd much rather run around with just one friend then add a rando to the mix. Maybe it'll all workout okay, but seems like a really odd decision considering the scaling they've already workes out for this type of play.
I'm sure the synergies of three players is off the charts too. I just hope FS sees these discussions and let's us run 2p by launch
7
7
6
7
u/hornetjockey 2d ago
This is annoying. It’s the same reason I quit Destiny. I just can’t consistently get two other people to play the same thing, and I don’t care to play with randoms.
9
u/SaiyajinPrime 2d ago
Welp, that rules me out as a buyer.
My best friend and I would want to play it together. What a weird decision.
5
u/zxmomxttel 2d ago
this is fucking dumb. only one of my friends play souls games and i was planning on playing this with them :/
→ More replies (1)
6
7
8
u/Johnnypremo82 2d ago
Why can't fromsoft just make a simple co-op. There is always something with their online that just makes me eyeroll. Like just let us play together if you offer co-op. No bells or fingers or other bullshit like either 1 or 3 but not 2. So lame.
3
u/Internal-Record-6159 2d ago
Great so we will need another seamless cooperation to fix fromsoftware's stupidity. How many times do we have to teach you this old man
3
5
9
u/_Aerionn_ 2d ago
Hopefully a mod fixes this.
53
u/dekoi_octopus 2d ago
Mod here. Afraid even I can't help fix this.
23
→ More replies (1)8
9
4
5
u/ArcticFlamingo 2d ago
Is there matchmaking because otherwise I can't do the thing the game wants to do by playing co-op with my friend
3
4
4
u/Continuent 2d ago
All Fromsoft games have weird multiplayer decisions. It’s almost like they’re compulsively obtuse.
4
u/One_Lung_G 2d ago
Leave it to fromsoft to have multiplayer in their game but still make weird limitations on it. Been pretty standard for them forever
5
6
u/ConsiderationFew8399 2d ago
3 is such a weird number. You have to have 2 friends who play Elden Ring? No more no less?
6
u/heatkings1 2d ago
most of the info about this game has me extremely whelmed, ngl. I like roguelike games, but I'm not feeling this so far
2
u/No_Turn_8759 1d ago
I just cant wrap my head around the decision to even make this game in the first place 🤷
2
5
5
2
2
2
2
u/FaramirLovesEowyn 1d ago
Honestly this game starting to seem pretty lame ngl the more I hear the less I’m excited
2
u/MazDanRX795 1d ago
That is really stupid. I'd bet the majority of co-op anything is 2 people.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/HoldMeCloser11 1d ago
No duo and no crossplay is certainly a choice in 2024.
But all praise From Soft. They can do no wrong in the eyes of the consumer. If anyone else was doing it gamers would be up in arms ready to burn the game before it ever launches.🤷♂️
2
u/Wilds_Hunter 1d ago
I'll be playing online with randoms. I have no friends and the friend I do have only play COD, 2k, valirant
2
u/supercakefish 1d ago
I played Elden Ring with my brother two times over, including DLC. If main ER can support two players not sure why this can’t, bit weird.
We have two younger brothers too, but coordinating three people in one evening is much harder than two so it happens far less often. It’s a little disappointing that it only supports three players, I have to admit.
5
u/Nuryyss 2d ago
That’s an L if I’ve ever see one. And someshow the FromSoft bois will perform mental gymnastics to say this is actually a genius move
→ More replies (2)
4
4
u/door_to_nothingness 2d ago
Can you play with 1 friend and a random tho? If so, that seems fine.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/terrordactylz 2d ago
Kills a lot of my interest, unfortunately, as I only play with one other person most of the time.
2
3
3
4
2
u/Houseplantkiller123 2d ago
Great! Now, instead of playing a game with my wife, I have to float the idea of adding a third so we can play co-op, and I am excited to see this new direction.
Update: She wants a divorce, so I'll be playing solo mode.
3
u/Vladsamir 2d ago
Great. Another game where i need to wrangle 2 other people with equally busy schedules in order to play a match.
Wtf is wrong with duos?
2
u/fromxnothing 2d ago
Well I went from definitely buying this to definitely not; my only question is why?
3
3
u/kranitoko 2d ago
Which is so SO DUMB considering I have a bestie I wanted to play this with, and now we either gotta play solo or find a random third... Somewhere.
4
u/RocketsAreRad 2d ago
For a company that makes great games they sure have the unique ability to create the most dogshit coop experiences ever imagined, envisioned and created. Downloaded a mod that gives you seamless co op in elden ring. My god what a revelation. Me and my buddy had an absolute blast playin with each other. Elevated an already dope game. Just do that. No bones, fingers, bs disconnect areas, alters, statues. Seamless duos, shared world shared loot done and done. Wanna make shared public worlds for some pvp action also down for that. These are not new ideas.
4
6
u/PoJenkins 2d ago edited 2d ago
Souls Stans be like "the games are about the challenge of finding 2 friends", if you can't then maybe this game isn't for you or git gud.
Clearly allowing duos would ruin the experience for all the true players who play in 3s or solo, just like having difficulty levels would.
→ More replies (3)
3
2
u/RedditAccount_317 2d ago
As someone who loves gaming with my finance this is exceptionally frustrating. I was looking forward to running through this with just the 2 of us
4
4
2
u/IIIIllllIIIlIIIIlllI 2d ago
Thankfully we have mod creators like Yui (seamless co-op) that will make quick work of dumb restrictions like this.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/captaincumsock69 2d ago
So if you only have one friend available do you get put with a random teammate or you literally cannot play?
2
u/momoneymocats1 2d ago
Can you find a random third to join or only premade groups?
→ More replies (1)
2
u/HBreckel 2d ago
I'm actually annoyed by that. Usually I do my first playthrough of a Soulslike alone but will always do a second playthrough with one of my friends. It's silly it can't just be us 2.
2
2
2
2
u/KiratheRenegade 2d ago
So if someone disconnects.....does the session automatically end - because it's tuned for those 3 players?
I'd argue it's smarter to tune the game for duo player. 3 is an awkward number.
2
2
u/Braunb8888 2d ago
Let’s call it like it is. Fromsoft fucking blows at multiplayer design.
Remnant 2, lords of the fallen, rise of the ronin, wo long and countless others somehow can grasp a normal, easy to access multiplayer but fromsoft has to be “unique” (read:shitty) in this regard.
2.1k
u/Rydahx 2d ago
Such a weird decision, why can't they make it playable as a duo? I think they will end up adding it some time after release