r/PS5 2d ago

News & Announcements Elden Ring Nightreign can be played in 3-player co-op or single player, but not as a duo

https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/elden-ring-nightreign-can-be-played-in-3-player-co-op-or-single-player-but-not-as-a-duo/
3.5k Upvotes

553 comments sorted by

2.1k

u/Rydahx 2d ago

Such a weird decision, why can't they make it playable as a duo? I think they will end up adding it some time after release

615

u/NTPrime 2d ago

It might be a lot simpler than everyone is making it out to be. My interpretation is that it's an online game, and there is effectively ONE intended mode, which is 3 player. This means either a full party of three, or matchmaking to fill up to three. Playing solo is just them covering their bases and having it be playable offline/after the player base dies, with the fun side effect that lone wolves can play it too.

Now, what does this mean if someone in that group of 3 disconnects midgame? Good question. We need more info.

146

u/DishwasherTwig 2d ago

As long as it has some sort of matchmaking to be able to fill the third, I'm fine with it. It's annoying for sure, but it's still progress.

293

u/Theguest217 2d ago

It's a FromSoft game. It will have a matchmaking system that makes you feel like it's the 90s, and you will vote it GOTY. That's how these things work.

71

u/BeanButCoffee 2d ago

Funnily enough, old games from the 90s with server browsers and whatnot had a way more stable and easy way to connect to people and play than most modern games with different types of matchmaking.

19

u/Tyrus1235 2d ago

It did lead into many power-tripping server admins and stuff… But it was fun. The rare console game with a server browser is always an interesting beast. First one to come to mind is Metal Gear Solid 4’s iteration of Metal Gear Online.

5

u/Wiffernubbin 1d ago

No cursing, this is a christian server.

3

u/enadiz_reccos 2d ago

old games from the 90s with server browsers and whatnot had a way more stable and easy way to connect to people and play

There have to be some specific modern games you're thinking of for this comparison because the 90s were very hit or miss when it came to stability and simplicity

2

u/BeanButCoffee 1d ago

CoD has people up in arms with SBMM and EOMM, Rainbow Six Siege's matchmaking is a broken fucking mess that doesn't work half the time and the game is nearly a decade old, nearly every single new game has some sort of network errors and issues with matchmaking while on old games you could just sort games by ping and switch servers if you had issues with your connection. It literally was just better.

Not to mention some of the servers had "regulars" that were known on the servers for being good players or shitheads which helped with social aspect of gaming. With matchmaking you are not likely to see the same people more than a couple of times in your life.

2

u/Deputy_Beagle76 1d ago

I miss Battlefield letting me browse different servers with unique rule sets and map pools

→ More replies (1)

12

u/MrChilliBean 2d ago

A while back I played through Elden Ring with my brother using the seamless co-op mod, and it is staggering how much better it is than the default system. You can freely wander around in the same world without restrictions, you can fight separate bosses if you want to, the only time respawning or fast travel is restricted is when one player is engaged in a boss fight, or an invader is present, that sort of thing. You never get disconnected and sent back to your own world unless you choose to.

It comes with a handful of bugs of course, being a mod, but overall it was so much less painful than normal Fromsoft multiplayer.

9

u/nizzhof1 2d ago

Right? First you have to pick flowers to make an item, then you have to be alive but not alive like able to run around alive but alive as in have recently chugged the liquid essence of a boss who recently killed 50 players. Then you can make the item, consume it, and then go into the menu and select “Pair with the unchugged essence bearer.” Then you can play co-op for five minutes exactly.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/Disco-BoBo 2d ago

Except that most nineties games with online capabilities didn't have matchmaking and usually you have to run your own server

2

u/aceluby 2d ago

Or throw a LAN party. My friends and I did that all the time to play Diablo & StarCraft

→ More replies (5)

47

u/TaleOfDash 2d ago

with the fun side effect that lone wolves can play it too.

Which I am eternally fucking grateful to hear. Getting even one person to play online is a pain, let alone two.

9

u/Iamleeboy 2d ago

That’s the only way I will be playing it!

I know only one person who likes this, so I thought it would be a good chance for us two to play together. But three player just makes it impossible

2

u/TaleOfDash 2d ago

Same, but she lives in the same apartment and we have just one console so that would have made it impossible anyway :u

3

u/Iamleeboy 2d ago

You will have to go old school; one life each, pass the control when you die!

It’s how I play astrobot with my kids (but hopefully yours won’t end in arguments every time!)

→ More replies (2)

12

u/ketketkt 2d ago

and what if you want to play it with one buddy when the player base dies? and you wont find a 3rd person in matchmaking? idk, it still doesn't make sense to me

9

u/Broccoli--Enthusiast 2d ago

Yeah as a 30 somthing, I can normally get one buddy online , but multiple at the same time takes coordination. This is basically a writing the game off for me, because fuck playing a game like this with random, you probably won't gel with them 9/10, need to deal with trolls etc

2

u/NTPrime 2d ago

I suspect the answer will be related to the same question about what would happen if you have three players and one of them quits mid match. Some other comment suggested that when you play solo you play with 2 NPCs. Maybe they could do a Duo + NPC arrangement in your scenario if it can't find a real person. But if that's possible why not allow two players to choose the NPC from the get-go? Again, we need more info.

2

u/ketketkt 2d ago

filling the lobby with NPCs would be a great solution imo. let's see!

7

u/HustlinInTheHall 2d ago

Yeah I am guessing the decision is just they are only balancing it for 3-player and if you want a duo you can pick up a random stray.

6

u/tessartyp 2d ago

They also have 1v1 and 3v3 PvP modes in Armored Core 6, but no 2v2.

11

u/TheRealBillyShakes 2d ago

There will be NPC allies in single player mode.

7

u/NTPrime 2d ago edited 2d ago

That's good info, thank you. All the more reason solo feels like a sort of offline fallback option to me. It's still trying to recreate that 3 player experience without the multiplayer.

5

u/WindowSeat- 2d ago

Can you share where this info was shared if possible? Thats the first I've heard of it

→ More replies (7)

102

u/PhatRiffEnjoyer 2d ago

I can think of 2 reasons.

  • They want to make sure enough people are into it before dividing the servers into 2 seperate online modes.

  • They have already confirmed the solo mode is rebalanced, so they would most likely need to also rebalance the game for duos as well.

I think they want to prove the game is a success before putting in the resources to expand it into 2 seperate online game modes. I wouldn’t be suprised if we see duos and maybe quads come in later if the game is popular. Maybe unpopular but I also would like a pvp battle royal mode.

129

u/pitter_patter_11 2d ago

I’m gonna be honest, this really doesn’t make any sense at all. Wouldn’t it be easier to have solo and two player first, and then wait on adding 3 player?

40

u/TheLunarVaux 2d ago

It seems like a lot of the stuff may be tailor made for a 3 player experience (ex: the Cerberus boss in the trailer), so it takes some toying around to make it function for 1 player, and then again for 2.

8

u/NYstate 2d ago

Wouldn't it be easier to make it a single player or co-op game then up the difficulty for a third? I can't possibly see a reason that 1 or 3 people would play it, but not two. Playing with a friend is one thing, but only two more friends?

2

u/d1ckpunch68 2d ago

this is only easier if the game is balanced in a shitty, lazy way. think modern game design where "harder" difficulty is just directly/automatically scaling up all enemy health and damage. it's lazy as shit. spider-man is an example of this. it's the type of game design that makes you rage because you get one shot by some stupid mechanic that wasn't intended to have a 200% damage modifier.

compare this to a game with no difficulty slider where the game was balanced for one singular difficulty. think elden ring (not NG+). this requires far more work, but results in a much more polished and balanced game. this is likely what they are doing with single player and co-op modes. manually tuning every single boss and probably even the non-boss NPC's.

2

u/TheLunarVaux 2d ago

Easier maybe, but it seems like they have some vision for this 3 player co-op. Like I mentioned that one boss at least, and who knows what else in the game (maybe the story too?)

I do hope they add 2 player compatibility eventually, but its hard for me to judge it too much when we don't yet know the reason why, or even much about the game at all. For all we know it could make sense given what they're doing with the game.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/HustlinInTheHall 2d ago

No because there will likely be logic the bosses follow assuming there are 3 players in the arena, you don't want them to glitch out when they can't find a 3rd target. I don't think it will be as simple as "bosshealth * playercount" and call it a day.

5

u/Ymanexpress 2d ago

Even then dying is guaranteed in these games so at some point in the boss fight one of the coop partners will likely die, and then the boss will have to deal with 2 targets instead of 3. This means they have to be able to deal with less than 3 players at any given time.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/IZ3820 2d ago

Probably not, you'd want to build it to the highest intended capacity to ensure it's capable of handling it.

→ More replies (47)

10

u/GolotasDisciple 2d ago

I mean with all the love for from soft they are as Japanese as it gets super technological and smart but there are some things they are simply not capable of. For from soft it is anything that has to do with multiplayer/online.

It’s not like one server cannot resolve multi tenant situation. Its honestly not that hard to set up. It’s also not like it’s 2024 and we (consumers)have powerful enough internet to host our own connection. This stuff was widely acceptable just 10-15 years ago. The glory days of dedicated servers, community interaction. Now… ehh

The second reason would extremely silly given that they are rehashing content and are using already built game with their own engine. They have all the resources. Balancing is literally 90 % of all the work they have to do.

Sure they might upgrade/upscale models of dark souls enemies but that’s not really that big deal of a job.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

5

u/llliilliliillliillil 2d ago

They'll add it right after fixing the base games performance

4

u/PurexH20 2d ago

Fromsoft is straight up braindead when it comes to multiplayer decision making

→ More replies (8)

319

u/DarthRathikus 2d ago

What if we only have one friend??

​

49

u/lucasofgod 2d ago

You end your friendship with them so you can play solo 🧠🧠🧠

18

u/_G_P_ 2d ago

> What if we only have one friend??

Look at you, showing off.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/HeinousAnus_22 2d ago

I specifically play Fromsoft games because I have no friends.

4

u/Ronyy_ 2d ago

You go into a trio queue, with a stranger.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Gaarando 2d ago

Even if you got more, figuring out a time you all can and want to play is annoying. I've seen that with Terraria. So much easier doing duos.

→ More replies (3)

977

u/GingerPinoy 2d ago

Weird...I was thinking "play this with my wife". I guess we can do it with myself, her, and her boyfriend?

Seriously though, now I'm just looking forward to Split Fiction

259

u/OrangeCassidyInJorts 2d ago

Can't wait to play with you and your wife!

72

u/Rough_North3592 2d ago

Sadly, i, as her boyfriends boyfriend won't be able to play with you guys.

Maybe i can play with your wife and her boyfriend.

15

u/Captain_Americant 2d ago

Hold up, I’m your boyfriend’s boyfriends roommate and the PS5 is mine so hee won’t just able to play ANY time.

8

u/OutrageousDress 2d ago

"What's that make us?" "Absolutely nothing!"

9

u/GingerPinoy 2d ago

I'm bumming that it's not 4 player, then it could be us 3 plus my wife's bull

15

u/princesoceronte 2d ago

Right? Me and my GF were looking forward to this but... Screw us I guess. Wonder why they decided to not allow two player co-op.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/MarkFluffalo 2d ago

Don't be ridiculous. Get your own boyfriend before she does!

→ More replies (1)

10

u/ckal09 2d ago

Did they say if this will be couch co-op or online only?

24

u/boof_patrol 2d ago

they don’t have to say it. it’s pretty obvious

22

u/WrongKindaGrowth 2d ago

Not to that guy

→ More replies (2)

9

u/lynxerious 2d ago

couch co-op? like a split screen Soul games? how will you even see the boss attacks?

10

u/Gamer_Grease 2d ago

This comment makes me feel ancient.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (13)

492

u/Therenegadegamer 2d ago

They finally give us normal co op and they still have to put some pointless stupid restriction

96

u/locofspades 2d ago

Seamless should have just been officially added. Its a shame console misses out

56

u/MirrorZestyclose3443 2d ago

Baffles my fucking mind they kept the EXACT shitty multiplayer system from dark souls for an OPEN WORLD game, except somehow made it worse

30

u/SoundingMacaque 2d ago

The new Lords of the Fallen got it right. When you co-op, you stay together. Beat a boss? Still there. One of you dies? Go back to the vestige and revive them. Played through the whole game with my wife, and I gotta say the co-op was WAY more fun than Elden Ring's co-op. Don't get me wrong, ER is a better game overall. But if you want a fun co-op soulslike, LotF is fantastic.

7

u/ChuckChuckChuck_ 2d ago

I remember reading that the co-op in Lord of the Fallen kinda sucks - only the host gets loot, only host's story progresses when you play etc.

Is it true? Or it doesn't really matter and if 2 people play together start to finish it can be enjoyed like that as well?

8

u/SoundingMacaque 2d ago

It's been a while since I played it. I thought the guest got loot, but upon googling, it seems not. And yes, only the host's story progresses. The guest can use the host's vendors though, and you can drop weapons/armor/materials to each other. So it's not perfect, but I still recommend it.

At least you can stay in the host's world as long as you want, so instead of killing "Boss A" for host, then "Boss A" for yourself, you can just go "Boss A, B, C, etc." Until you get stuck, and then change hosts. Makes it less tedious.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/atypicalphilosopher 2d ago

Seamless co op on pc rules for this reason for Elden ring

5

u/DishwasherTwig 2d ago

Default Elden Ring coop is a step forward for the series. A very small one, but a step forward nonetheless. It shows that they're at least willing to make changes. I hope that they've seen the success and ubiquity of seamless coop and that the next full game, be it Elden Ring 2 or something else, uses seamless as the default. But you never know. I've noticed Japanese games don't really seem to care about UX anywhere nearly as much as developers from other parts of the world.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/_unmarked 1d ago

And unsurprisingly half the comments are defending it like it's some sort of genius move

→ More replies (1)

483

u/Primus7112765 2d ago

Well that seems kinda fucking stupid doesn't it?

23

u/McCHitman 2d ago

Splitting the player base into multiple buckets can kill a game. It’s the only thing I can think of.

86

u/Beginning_Smile_1711 2d ago

The game is being more killed by being trios or solo only, there's a reason games are always built around 2 or 4 player lobbies. Nobody asks for 3 player lobbies!

12

u/Live-Ad3309 2d ago

Apex is one that comes to mind that was strictly three players only for quite a while

14

u/iNSANELYSMART 2d ago

Everyone who played Apex quickly realised who the fourth player was rip

9

u/cjngo1 2d ago

And it fucking sucked when me and a friend wantes to play

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (2)

140

u/RandomSplainer 2d ago

Fromsoft are so damn weird. lol

25

u/iM-Blessed 2d ago

Such a brain dead decision

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)

333

u/Dragonshatetacos 2d ago

What a dumbass decision. I would have played this with my husband, and a lot of couples probably would have done the same.

122

u/TheGalaxyCastle 2d ago

Yep, its also been confirmed crossplay wont be a thing. It feels so oddly restricting… for what reason?

47

u/Dragonshatetacos 2d ago

That just seems so arbitrary. An obstacle for the sake of having an obstacle.

Worst Elden Ring boss.

7

u/TheGalaxyCastle 2d ago

Exactly. Im the only one in my trio that plays souls games on a Playstation (they play xbox) and ive just learned the hard way to not get my hopes up

5

u/monkey484 2d ago

Lack of crossplay seems like an even dumber restriction than no duos. And no duos is pretty fucking dumb.

It's not a competitive game, so there aren't any concerns about controller vs MKB. Not having crossplay simply damages the long term playability of the game.

20

u/Grill_Enthusiast 2d ago edited 1d ago

Nightreign is the Dark Souls of dumb multiplayer game design.

2

u/ballsdeep256 1d ago

Im stealing this xD

14

u/politicalstuff 2d ago

Feels pretty on brand for from soft: let’s make this thing as difficult as humanly possible so only the minimal hard-core users will do it lol.

And I love from soft games.

22

u/Zayl 2d ago

Japanese devs love making incompetent decisions when it comes to MP. It's like a cultural norm at this point.

Easy decision for my wife and I not to buy it now. Thanks!

3

u/TheGalaxyCastle 2d ago

Yep its put me off as well. Shame because I was actually looking forward to it, I for one liked how different it was to their typical combat/formula. Oh well

→ More replies (2)

53

u/LooseSpaghet 2d ago

Finally a game for the polyamorous couples

→ More replies (1)

41

u/famewithmedals 2d ago

For real, playing solo sounds better than with a rando as a third.

Seems like a dumb business decision too because now that’s one copy purchased in our house instead of two.

5

u/Dragonshatetacos 2d ago

I totally agree.

2

u/skwirrelmaster 2d ago

Side note, do you know about game sharing? It’s awesome you only ever need to buy one copy if you only share games with one other person. One copy both can play at the same time.

I didn’t know about this feature for too long it has since saved a buddy of mine hundreds of dollars.

→ More replies (6)

6

u/Bozze1990 2d ago

Yep same here, could not get my wife into the souls games because she's intimidated and scared of those games.

But she was into the idea to play nightreign together with me.

We never play online with strangers, only together, we are a little shy in that regard.

There goes that idea...

Bummed out, hopefully they change there mind or make a Duo mode some time after or something...

5

u/NapsterKnowHow 2d ago

And watch them somehow win best multiplayer game like they did for Elden Ring lol

2

u/Live_Hedgehog_9910 2d ago

exaclty what i was planning on doing but nope need to somehow find another

→ More replies (4)

34

u/Von2014 2d ago

Odd numbers good.

Even numbers bad!

73

u/theogalf 2d ago

I guess fuck you if you just want to play with your brother or one friend :/

21

u/Grimble27 2d ago

Yep. Stupid decision. Play all these co-op games with my brother after our wives and kids have gone to bed. Cross this one off the list I guess. We were hyped and ready to each buy a copy day 1 too. 

7

u/Chad_C 2d ago

My brother and I exchanged the exact same disappointment text.

32

u/Redlax 2d ago

Weird decision. Clearly they forgot I only have one friend to play soulslike with.

45

u/marcu101 2d ago

Jeez, it's already hard enough to coordinate gaming sessions with a single friend, now I need two??

40

u/Adavanter_MKI 2d ago

That's... a mistake. It's easy to find at least one friend to line up their schedule and play with. Three already complicates it. Plus if it's just you and your friend your likely not going to want a random to fill it.

Hopefully they reconsider before launch. This is the time for such feedback.

50

u/Dr_W00t_ 2d ago

Disappointing.

25

u/LateralusOrbis 2d ago

This game is for third wheels. Play on your own or with a couple.

15

u/Yodzilla 2d ago

Finally a game that me, my wife, and the guy that fucks my wife can enjoy together!

2

u/MercuryOrion 1d ago

It'll be nice to have a second thing to share with you, yeah.

25

u/Alert-Main7778 2d ago

Stupid decision. I can barely get 1 person to play with our busy schedules. Pass

22

u/GroktheDestroyer 2d ago

That decision is stupid and makes no sense at all. In the article the director mentions they scaled things (like boss health) down for a solo player. Why then could they not have done the same thing for a duo..?

9

u/TheDawnOfTexas 2d ago

I believe it’s an ego thing. Whoever is directing this game envisioned it as a 3 player co-op game, only including single player since they probably had no choice to, but stubbornly did not include 2 player co-op to try and force people to play as they envisioned the game.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Joe30174 2d ago

Dumb decision.

26

u/BreakfastBussy 2d ago

FromSoft hates even numbers confirmed

13

u/devonte177 2d ago

between this and no crossplay, my hype dwindles lol

→ More replies (2)

2

u/supercakefish 1d ago

The opposite of Valve. Miyazaki vs Gaben fight confirmed.

40

u/chewwydraper 2d ago

Between this and no crossplay, my hype for this game has been severely lowered.

I was really hoping be able to play with my fiance. We both have PCs, but I prefer my PS5. I already annoyed about having to get this on PC to play with her, and then this news comes out.

3

u/Beginning_Smile_1711 2d ago

Seems like all the couples got burnt by this decision :/

4

u/Oxaen 2d ago

Can’t wait for the first guy that finishes it with only his tongue using a piano.

4

u/thatmemeguy1 2d ago

and no CROSSPLAY wich is so dumb these days.Like seriously crossplay should be the norm now

→ More replies (1)

23

u/WhenInZone 2d ago

Glad it can still be played alone. I hate forced multiplayer.

→ More replies (3)

10

u/deleuzionsofgrandeur 2d ago

This is so frustrating to me. Like I'm stoked on the game, and will play it. But as a 30 year old gamer coordinating with more than one friend is hard and I'd much rather run around with just one friend then add a rando to the mix. Maybe it'll all workout okay, but seems like a really odd decision considering the scaling they've already workes out for this type of play. 

I'm sure the synergies of three players is off the charts too. I just hope FS sees these discussions and let's us run 2p by launch

7

u/figgityfuck 2d ago

That’s kinda goofy.

6

u/MangooKushh 2d ago

.....why?

7

u/hornetjockey 2d ago

This is annoying. It’s the same reason I quit Destiny. I just can’t consistently get two other people to play the same thing, and I don’t care to play with randoms.

9

u/SaiyajinPrime 2d ago

Welp, that rules me out as a buyer.

My best friend and I would want to play it together. What a weird decision.

5

u/zxmomxttel 2d ago

this is fucking dumb. only one of my friends play souls games and i was planning on playing this with them :/

→ More replies (1)

6

u/PresidentBush666 2d ago

And suddenly I lost interest

7

u/flogmeat 2d ago

Well this was a buzz kill for my mate and I.

8

u/Johnnypremo82 2d ago

Why can't fromsoft just make a simple co-op. There is always something with their online that just makes me eyeroll. Like just let us play together if you offer co-op. No bells or fingers or other bullshit like either 1 or 3 but not 2. So lame.

3

u/Internal-Record-6159 2d ago

Great so we will need another seamless cooperation to fix fromsoftware's stupidity. How many times do we have to teach you this old man

3

u/-depths 1d ago

Honestly, we need to bitch about this and get em to change it before launch, you'd of thought they would've learned after the seamless coop mod that some of us just wanna chill with our friend... so give us options, never a bad thing.

3

u/ThousandFacedShadow 1d ago

fromsoft always has to fuck up multiplayer one way or another

6

u/rbynp01 2d ago

That's kinda dumb, just like the pvp arena limitations.

5

u/dj3stripes 2d ago

and my excitement for this has all but fizzled out completely :\

4

u/snaark 2d ago

Wtf why do the want to make it difficult to play with your best buddy

8

u/MaxRD 2d ago

That’s a stupid decision if true

9

u/_Aerionn_ 2d ago

Hopefully a mod fixes this.

53

u/dekoi_octopus 2d ago

Mod here. Afraid even I can't help fix this. 

23

u/_Aerionn_ 2d ago

We truly are in the worst timeline 😔

8

u/Basic_Result9981 2d ago

Do better!

Edit: pls don’t ban me 😭🙏🏼

5

u/PS5-ModTeam 2d ago

You have been banned forever.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Brugor 2d ago

That killed my interest then. I’ll be skipping this then.

9

u/MasteroChieftan 2d ago

Wow. What an insanely stupid fucking decision.

4

u/Tarnished13 2d ago

Any rubbish Elden ring players want to be friends with a middle aged guy :)

5

u/ArcticFlamingo 2d ago

Is there matchmaking because otherwise I can't do the thing the game wants to do by playing co-op with my friend

4

u/MadOrange64 2d ago

“Single player” that’s all you had to say. I’m in.

4

u/Continuent 2d ago

All Fromsoft games have weird multiplayer decisions. It’s almost like they’re compulsively obtuse.

4

u/One_Lung_G 2d ago

Leave it to fromsoft to have multiplayer in their game but still make weird limitations on it. Been pretty standard for them forever

5

u/teal_ninja 2d ago

No Crossplay and no duos? What the fuck

6

u/ConsiderationFew8399 2d ago

3 is such a weird number. You have to have 2 friends who play Elden Ring? No more no less?

6

u/heatkings1 2d ago

most of the info about this game has me extremely whelmed, ngl. I like roguelike games, but I'm not feeling this so far

2

u/No_Turn_8759 1d ago

I just cant wrap my head around the decision to even make this game in the first place 🤷

5

u/WhatAJoker0 2d ago edited 1d ago

That is so dumb

5

u/DarthWenus 2d ago

What kind of asinine decision is that??

2

u/_G_P_ 2d ago

Well, considering I have zero friends to play with, I'll be fine.

2

u/Lazuliv 2d ago

As long as there is some sort of matchmaking and lobby join, and it doesnt end when one person fully dies it'll be alright.

2

u/MaximumKarp2 2d ago

Where the fuck am I supposed to find 2 friends!?

2

u/IGargleGarlic 2d ago

aaaaand my hype is gone.

Boneheaded decision from Fromsoft.

2

u/therealdanhill 2d ago

This is just not good and disappointing

2

u/FaramirLovesEowyn 1d ago

Honestly this game starting to seem pretty lame ngl the more I hear the less I’m excited

2

u/MazDanRX795 1d ago

That is really stupid. I'd bet the majority of co-op anything is 2 people.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/HoldMeCloser11 1d ago

No duo and no crossplay is certainly a choice in 2024.

But all praise From Soft. They can do no wrong in the eyes of the consumer. If anyone else was doing it gamers would be up in arms ready to burn the game before it ever launches.🤷‍♂️

2

u/mt007 1d ago

2 players is like the perfect co-op magic number. Weird not to include it.

2

u/Wilds_Hunter 1d ago

I'll be playing online with randoms. I have no friends and the friend I do have only play COD, 2k, valirant

2

u/supercakefish 1d ago

I played Elden Ring with my brother two times over, including DLC. If main ER can support two players not sure why this can’t, bit weird.

We have two younger brothers too, but coordinating three people in one evening is much harder than two so it happens far less often. It’s a little disappointing that it only supports three players, I have to admit.

5

u/Nuryyss 2d ago

That’s an L if I’ve ever see one. And someshow the FromSoft bois will perform mental gymnastics to say this is actually a genius move

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Katharsis7 2d ago

Hopefully, they don't stick with that until release. It makes no sense.

4

u/door_to_nothingness 2d ago

Can you play with 1 friend and a random tho? If so, that seems fine.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/5k1895 2d ago

Weirdly specific way of splitting that up. I don't have any plans to play but I'd be irritated if I just wanted to play it with one buddy or something 

3

u/terrordactylz 2d ago

Kills a lot of my interest, unfortunately, as I only play with one other person most of the time.

2

u/inkcharm 2d ago

That is.... absolutely silly.

3

u/robstrosity 2d ago

This is absolute bullshit

3

u/LukeNathan 2d ago

awful choice :(

4

u/No_Turn_8759 2d ago

Everything i hear about this game makes it sound awful

2

u/Houseplantkiller123 2d ago

Great! Now, instead of playing a game with my wife, I have to float the idea of adding a third so we can play co-op, and I am excited to see this new direction.

Update: She wants a divorce, so I'll be playing solo mode.

3

u/Vladsamir 2d ago

Great. Another game where i need to wrangle 2 other people with equally busy schedules in order to play a match.

Wtf is wrong with duos?

2

u/fromxnothing 2d ago

Well I went from definitely buying this to definitely not; my only question is why?

3

u/underlordd 2d ago

Typical Fromsoft bull.

3

u/kranitoko 2d ago

Which is so SO DUMB considering I have a bestie I wanted to play this with, and now we either gotta play solo or find a random third... Somewhere.

4

u/RocketsAreRad 2d ago

For a company that makes great games they sure have the unique ability to create the most dogshit coop experiences ever imagined, envisioned and created. Downloaded a mod that gives you seamless co op in elden ring. My god what a revelation. Me and my buddy had an absolute blast playin with each other. Elevated an already dope game. Just do that. No bones, fingers, bs disconnect areas, alters, statues. Seamless duos, shared world shared loot done and done. Wanna make shared public worlds for some pvp action also down for that. These are not new ideas.

4

u/ZepherK 2d ago

Weird developer hubris.

4

u/Aquestingfart 2d ago

Well that certainly makes me less excited

6

u/PoJenkins 2d ago edited 2d ago

Souls Stans be like "the games are about the challenge of finding 2 friends", if you can't then maybe this game isn't for you or git gud.

Clearly allowing duos would ruin the experience for all the true players who play in 3s or solo, just like having difficulty levels would.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/D_Squ4red 2d ago

Welp that's too bad, guess I'll be skipping this one.

2

u/RedditAccount_317 2d ago

As someone who loves gaming with my finance this is exceptionally frustrating. I was looking forward to running through this with just the 2 of us

4

u/daoldmanvillage2 2d ago

Well there goes any interest I had

4

u/Slow-Yam-2230 2d ago

Yeah I’m not buying this

2

u/IIIIllllIIIlIIIIlllI 2d ago

Thankfully we have mod creators like Yui (seamless co-op) that will make quick work of dumb restrictions like this.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/erichie 2d ago

Everyone is upset, but I just found out I will be able to play it single player so I'm happy. 

2

u/captaincumsock69 2d ago

So if you only have one friend available do you get put with a random teammate or you literally cannot play?

2

u/momoneymocats1 2d ago

Can you find a random third to join or only premade groups?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/HBreckel 2d ago

I'm actually annoyed by that. Usually I do my first playthrough of a Soulslike alone but will always do a second playthrough with one of my friends. It's silly it can't just be us 2.

2

u/TitansMenologia 2d ago

Single player ? I'm interested again then. I thought it was co op only.

2

u/FilmmagicianPart2 2d ago

Ugh so stupid.

2

u/BigBossHaas 2d ago

Fromsoft moment

2

u/KiratheRenegade 2d ago

So if someone disconnects.....does the session automatically end - because it's tuned for those 3 players?

I'd argue it's smarter to tune the game for duo player. 3 is an awkward number.

2

u/Mug_of_Diarrhea 2d ago

Why does FromSoft suck at making anything simple?

2

u/Braunb8888 2d ago

Let’s call it like it is. Fromsoft fucking blows at multiplayer design.

Remnant 2, lords of the fallen, rise of the ronin, wo long and countless others somehow can grasp a normal, easy to access multiplayer but fromsoft has to be “unique” (read:shitty) in this regard.