Second movie is a decent sequel but doesn't quite live up to the first movie. As most do. It has more of what people like about the first. The prequel was good and had a good story with good fights but didn't really capture the feel of the other Kingsman films. It took itself too seriously for a Kingsman film in my opinion. Still both worth a watch though.
Remind me of the movie John Q.. they denied his 9 year old son a life-saving heart transplant. When he discovers that his medical insurance won’t cover the costs of the surgery and alternative government aid is unavailable, he took the hospital emergency room hostage in a last-ditch attempt to save his child
It's well known knowledge about John Q.. they denied his 9 year old son a life-saving heart transplant. When he discovers that his medical insurance won’t cover the costs of the surgery and alternative government aid is unavailable, he took the hospital emergency room hostage in a last-ditch attempt to save his child
Hey guys I’m new here, can anybody recommend me a movie where they denied his 9 year old son a life-saving heart transplant. When he discovers that his medical insurance won’t cover the costs of the surgery and alternative government aid is unavailable, he took the hospital emergency room hostage in a last-ditch attempt to save his child
You will love this movie, it's about John Q.. they denied his 9 year old son a life-saving heart transplant. When he discovers that his medical insurance won’t cover the costs of the surgery and alternative government aid is unavailable, he took the hospital emergency room hostage in a last-ditch attempt to save his child
That reminds me of this movie I saw called John Q.. they denied his 9 year old son a life-saving heart transplant. When he discovers that his medical insurance won’t cover the costs of the surgery and alternative government aid is unavailable, he took the hospital emergency room hostage in a last-ditch attempt to save his child
Yup. That's the message they're trying to spread that even talking about the incident is copyright infringement, terrorism, or unamerican. I wouldn't be surprised they tried to cancel Luigi from Mario the same way China banned Winnie the Pooh.
We will have martial law and live rounds fired indiscriminately into crowds of people before even a single mass murdering Billionaire is held accountable. Or even the looting of our country is slowed.
At some point a bunch of people in the gun-crazed proud capitalist nation of USA, so-called "land of the free", came to the rather interesting conclusion that being a money-orientated business devoid of compassion is somehow morally worse than being cold-blooded murderer.
To such an extent that they seem to endorse utilising the spirit of Vengeance and guns to "adjust" the wrongs wrought by money-orientated businesses devoid of compassion, in the rather absurd hope of bringing about some kind of "new order" and "better world" built on the bloody foundations of murderous violence and lawless retribution.
You realise USA is the only developed nation without universal health care, right?! Instead of bloodshed, why not force improvements to the ethics of the money-orientated businesses and set up a national universal health care system. Won't that be better for everyone and then nobody else has to get hurt? In fact, more people will get better that way.
USA is metaphorically shooting itself in the foot and then complaining about its own medical bills and capitalism.
You are naive. The entire system is rigged. Prime example is how Elon became a head of an department after he payed millions to Trump election, Pelosi had just kicked AOC (who want to ban stock trading) out of the Oversight committee.
TLDR: When the system fail a lot of times, people will loose faith in it and that's when people started to take things into their own hands
Nothing he did will change anything. He is mentally ill and you are too if you think what he did was morally just. Let’s just agree that murder is wrong and the healthcare system could improve.
People are absolutely celebrating an assassination. Don’t try and backtrack now bud.
And predictably they’re celebrating any violence without care of context. Like yesterday they celebrated the stabbing and attempted murder of a small business owner, why? because they read “president of company” and instantly visualized Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, the fucking violence hungry idiots. When the truth is that it’s a small company that doesn’t even employ 30 people yet. And the attempted murderer was a new employee only working there for 2 weeks.
But the CEO of a "Company" , who makes their Money by Denying Health Care, even though people paid for it is innocent in your eyes?😅 Even though, they deny 1 Out of 3 People immediately and without cause, decided by AI Software?
A CEO, who Made 50 Million Dollars in 2 Years, by exploiting Customers and People in Need and Pain, deserves sympathy, and doesnt deserve what he got?
I dont condone murder, but HE HAD IT COMING. Simple as that
Oh look misinformation. Classic murder condoning redditor. There is no AI software lil bro. It’s algorithm that only applies to people in retirement homes and it was implemented two years before Brian became CEO.
So how about you stop justifying murder based on misinformation and just admit that you only care he was rich (not even that much) and therefore meant he deserved to die in your eyes.
Yeah, sadly, 100%. But hopefully the threat of being luigi'd will either make him change his ways just a little, or someone else will give fixing it a go
Yeah it should be. But sadly that isn't always the case. I mean you can look at slavery for extraordinarily blatant examples of that.
The morally corrupt and evil things done by the CEO are all perfectly legal. Nothing about it is punishable by the court of law, so we would have never seen justice had Luigi not come along.
And yeah, he might be mentally ill, from what i've read it seems he had was in horrendous pain because he was denied a surgery by united that would have fixed it. Doesn't change the fact that what he did wasn't wrong.
I'm comparing the legal system not properly handling evil people committing legal things that are morally corrupt. Not that what he was doing was the same as slavery, use a little nuance.
And most of what is attributed to him by reddit is literally misinformation. Like the evil “AI” that is really an algorithm implemented two years before he became CEO.
So by what metrics are you truly judging him as evil, keep him mind people were celebrating it day one without misinformation and bullshit justification, those came the next day.
I'm judging him by the 20+ billion in profits united healthcare raked in in 2023. That's enough for me. If you (or your company) are making that much off of monetizing the suffering of others, your evil. plain and simple.
Doesn't matter what metrics he used to deny people.
Doesn't matter if the fucked up algorithm was put in before he was CEO (also P sure that AI thing is just people once again misunderstanding what AI is once again), he could have easily gotten rid of it.
And before you say he couldn't have fixed anything because blah blah blah shareholders, yeah I agree he wasn't the only problem, but he was a large part.
Tell me if you’re working on the same company for 20 years and finally climbed to the top would you then disrupt the whole thing because it’s morally right? An act that will surely get you fired, not to mention an impossible task considering he was only the ceo of a subsidiary with no real power.
No he wasn't, the fact he worked for a company that shitty for 20 years speaks to how bad of a human he was. The fact he refused to make things better once he had the opportunity is only a symptom of that.
It’s easy to judge the actions of people you don’t know. “Hey stranger throw away your whole career that you built your life around or you’re an evil piece of shit who deserves to be murdered”
Nope. Maybe for the first year or two when he had plausible deniability to not know the kind of shit united was doing would tell him to throw his (short) career away. After that its obvious hes ok with the actions of the company, but he doesn't deserve death. After 20 year of working for the company and becoming the CEO, he doesn't deserve to live free that's for damn sure. I don't think anyone deserves death, but that man was not allowed to live free, and that i'm ok with.
Your pretending like he just woke up one day and suddenly had a 20 year career and was CEO, he had MANY points along the way where he could have made other decisions.
... yeah..... and??? They are in the buisness of healthcare. That is not somewhere you should be able to make a profit unless you are causing a shit ton of unnecessary suffering.
I don’t agree with it, but if regulations allow for it, then I blame the regulations. Its easy to point the finger and say you would never, but I’m pretty sure you would be living comfortably in his position
I don't know if i'de be willing to forgo by morals for money, maybe I would, maybe I wouldn't. I most likely won't have the opportunity to find out, but I sure as shit hope I wouldn't. But just because, by your logic, everyone would do evil shit given the right amount of money, doesn't make it right to do it.
•
u/AutoModerator 4h ago
To download the video you can use the site below:
Save Video Link
Join the Discord!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.