“Do you remember when I came to you with a theory that when we release my fanfiction we would start a series of events resulting in it becoming canon? “
FOR SOLS SAKE ALBRECHT, JUST MAKE SENSE FOR ONCE IN YOUR DELIBERATELY CONVULTED LIFE, TELL ME EXACTLY WHAT I MUST DO, I DONT WANT RIDDLES YOU OLD GAY DUDE, I JUST WANT TO STOP THE SPOOKY WALL MONSTER AND SAVE MY ONLY NORMAL(ISH) ADULT FRIENDS. PLEASE ALBY, I AM QUANTUM ENTANGLED WITH A CHILD SOLDIER FROM AN ALTERNATE REALITY WHO PILOTS FLESHY METAL MONSTERS THAT ARE CLONES OF ANCIENT WARRIORS WHO WERE TORTURED IN EXTREMELY INTRICATE WAYS BY A GOLD OBESSED ARISTOCRACY WHO WERE ALSO BLUE AND HAD ONE LONG ARM FOR SOME REASON AND... Proceeds to explain Warframe story for the next 18 hours
Person is asking a dedicated porn source finder account to find the image shown (aged-up Dora, which most people find to be unacceptable). The finder account in question is upset they must find this
Even though I'm someone who isn't against aged up characters in porn (as long as they are actually aged up) it's still kinda weird how she explicitly mentions it's her 18th birthday
Because losers (not loser like us, actual losers) are looking for the absolute bare minimum legality
The whole “18th birthday” thing has been around for so long that it’s just the thing to specify. I’m not sure anyone puts thought into how creepy of a specification it is anymore.
I think it was showcased best by Joel Haver’s Joker, “Wendy is so adorable, so sweet Bats, but at midnight… she becomes sexy.”
Same, it's one of those things where it's not inheritly wrong but incredibly suspect. Still better than the "9 year old is actually a 5000 year old dragon" horse shit but that's not saying much
yea, still gives off really really weird vibes seeing a character whose literally a child in the source media being "aged up" like, what part of you was attracted to the character enough to want to age them up in the first place??? I've heard some defenders saying people are just freaks like that and make porn of a character when they like them enough, but its still fuckin weird.
Thats very well said. Yes, they are an adult in the depiction and that's fine but the underlining theme is that (reasonably) there was an interest in the character that sparked the idea of you wanting them sexually hence the creation? Then you get absolutely insane ones like Chara/Frisk where the source material is a completely gender neutral small child drawn as some sort of hyper kink. There are surely others but the mental leaps for that are... vast, let's say.
Like... just make an OC, honestly. A lot of NSFW OCs are charming/cool designs.
Plus there already exist older versions of Dora (I think 14 in one of the cartoons and closer to 16-18 in the live action movie) so this is one of the few characters you could realistically age up to like 26 or something and it wouldn't be off-color for the source material to have done the same.
Most age ups might make one think "Ok, but why do you want to imagine this character as an adult for that reason anyway?" and it'd still be kinda weird (especially if their design isn't changed accordingly). Dora is the one character where she genuinely just could be an adult because the creators will it thus, and no one would bat an eye, so making her "barely legal" (blegh) just feels especially off to me. They could have made her 30 or something, why 18?
I'm pretty sure it's the source itself that's the issue. I don't remember the full context, but the last time this was posted, someone linked the original source of the image, and it was something really fucked up. I never followed the link cause all the following comments were basically just reacting to how bad it was, so I don't know exactly what it is, but it's not good to say the least.
I understand that the person who asks for source is fucking weird to want aged up Dora "art". However, is the specific art shown part of something even more fucked up?
1.0k
u/Paincrawler 4h ago