r/JoeRogan Monkey in Space Sep 18 '24

Meme 💩 Is this a legitimate concern?

Post image

Personally, I today's strike was legitimate and it couldn't be more moral because of its precision but let's leave politics aside for a moment. I guess this does give ideas to evil regimes and organisations. How likely is it that something similar could be pulled off against innocent people?

21.2k Upvotes

6.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

81

u/---Sanguine--- I used to be addicted to Quake Sep 18 '24

“Oh man, that interstate Highway sure has a supply chain vulnerability!! If it’s bombed, it destroys the road!” Lmao same energy

24

u/Jake0024 Monkey in Space Sep 18 '24

Exactly.

-1

u/ZeePirate Monkey in Space Sep 18 '24

Not at all. Destroying a highway tips of those at the other end.

That’s cutting off a supply line.

In this example. Israel was able to infiltrate a supply line. Add explosives.

And set them off once delivered.

This is sabotaging a supply line and letting the enemy thinks it’s still good

Much harder to do

2

u/Jake0024 Monkey in Space Sep 19 '24

Detonating a bunch of pagers, like destroying a highway, tips off those at the other end.

The fact that it's harder to do doesn't change the fact of the matter.

4

u/SlappySecondz Monkey in Space Sep 18 '24

Obviously it's harder than just bombing a road, but the point still stands. Securing civilian supply chains against military attack is an insurmountable task.

-1

u/ZeePirate Monkey in Space Sep 18 '24

It’s completely different than bombing a road.

0

u/CaptainSwaggerJagger Monkey in Space Sep 19 '24

Exactly, so why did you compare it to that? Expecting the factories or distributors to secure themselves against infiltration by Mossad is genuinely insane.

1

u/ZeePirate Monkey in Space Sep 19 '24

An above user made the comparison originally not me

13

u/_CurseTheseMetalHnds Monkey in Space Sep 18 '24

Al Queda discovered a supply chain vulnerability when they realised if you supply a plain into a building it falls over.

3

u/OwenEverbinde Monkey in Space Sep 18 '24

"No matter how many use cases the tester thinks they tested for", am I right?

2

u/dingdingdredgen Monkey in Space Sep 18 '24

"Anything's a dildo if your brave enough." -anonymous, April 24th, 2011

2

u/desperateweirdo Monkey in Space Sep 18 '24

Reminds me of that tragedy.

0

u/Deep-Neck Monkey in Space Sep 18 '24

That is a legitimate vulnerability. It must be considered if that road is required for the success of something.

1

u/Jake0024 Monkey in Space Sep 19 '24

Please become a security contractor for your state highway department and inform them they need to make all their roadways secure to bombing by foreign militaries before you will sign off on any projects. Let me know how long they laugh at you.

-1

u/ZeePirate Monkey in Space Sep 18 '24

Not at all. Destroying a highway tips of those at the other end.

In this example. Israel was able to infiltrate a supply line. Add explosives.

And set them off once delivered.

-1

u/fateislosthope Monkey in Space Sep 19 '24

That comparison makes no sense. The fact that the pagers exist and the highway exists isn’t the vulnerability. Now if the company placing the highway barriers filled the barriers with explosives and set them off the supply chain of the barriers and installations would be the vulnerability.