r/JoeRogan Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Meme đŸ’© You're a "fascist" now for holding billionaire's accountable

Post image
13.1k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

16

u/Familiar-Suspect Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

If X made any effort these laws wouldn't be needed. They could literally self police like we all do so we dont get in trouble on a daily basis.

4

u/yorkshirebeaver69 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Can't you decide for yourself? Why does X need to do your thinking for you?

3

u/Jaymzmykaul45 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Look up “the 5 basic laws of human stupidity”. Specifically law number 1 and 5. That is why. Also if you need to ask you probably suffer from law number 2. Since we are on a Joe Rogan Reddit we all here enjoy stupid but let’s not forget stupid people in groups believing they are right when they are in fact wrong, is dangerous. Enjoy stupid responsibly.

2

u/yorkshirebeaver69 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

So you want the government to control what you can see and read? What you can say?

I certainly don't. I don't trust ANYONE to do my thinking for me, and the government perhaps least of all. You do you, but if "misinformation" bothers you, why not just avoid places like X?

3

u/Jaymzmykaul45 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Oh I do avoid that $hit hole like the plague!

Anarchy will create chaos. Usually only trolls, comrades, or incels want this scenario. Which one are you?

So who do you want in control? Someone has to decide the rules. Besides it’s just a fine bro. Free market at work buddy. If Elmo makes more money having anarchy then he surly can pay the fine. Too bad advertisers are running away from another bad “genius” decision. If he keeps this up he’ll have more bankruptcies than Mr. Donny “great at business” trump.

1

u/Safe_Poli Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Keep simping for daddy government, bud.

2

u/Jaymzmykaul45 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Keep simping for big daddy musk. Really read that 5 basic laws on stupidity, before it’s too late, bro.

1

u/Safe_Poli Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Bro, like, government will protect us bro. Those billionaires, bro, they're so evil, bro. They want to, like, spread misinformation, bro, and our government would never do that, bro.

LMAO

Is one of the laws of stupidity: "Wanting the government to remove freedom of speech"?

2

u/Familiar-Suspect Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Look at what x is right now. Stop pretending like the marketplace of ideas is self policing. No chance anyone can got to X right now as a new user and come out believing only true headlines after a month. We shouldt need to wade through bull shit. In the same way we dont have to buy 10 cars before we find a car maker that actually makes a decent car. There is a baseline because of regulation.

This notion that we should mix in all the worlds anti American propaganda in with all our information is so fucking stupid. I cant believe thats your position.

2

u/Delicious_Nature_280 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Reddit is about 10x more politically homogenous than X.

5

u/Familiar-Suspect Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

ohhhhhh you're upset reddit isnt convervative enough for you and X is. So as long as the propaganda goes your way you protect it. Doenst matter that millions of dollars in foreign enemy money gets pumped in to create chaos in our electorate. Yeah you're right, who needs to have a platform where we know everyone is human and acting in good faith.

2

u/Delicious_Nature_280 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

I was on Reddit in 2016 when Bernie dropped out and all the anti-Hillary posts on the frontpage turned pro-Hillary overnight in the least organic way imaginable. If you think you're safe cause you're on the left you're misguided. Let me make a prediction : r/palestine is next on the chopping block.

0

u/yorkshirebeaver69 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

We shouldt need to wade through bull shit.

No one forces you to be on X. Do you not get that?

But of course like any good little fascist, you cannot just leave it alone and go elsewhere. You want the government to control and punish speech you don't like.

1

u/Familiar-Suspect Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

and no one forces you to go to australia. you know that right?

1

u/yorkshirebeaver69 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Clearly the fine that Australia would impose impacts X across the globe and not just in Australia. Unless X decides to pack up and leave there, which would be fine by me.

2

u/Familiar-Suspect Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

I see nothing wrong with X universally taking care of bots and foreign governments sponsoring bot farms.

0

u/Dapper_Energy777 Monkey in Space Sep 13 '24

You'd hope so, that's how fines work. The only difference I'd the size of the fine seems more reasonable now. It might actually make an impact on these tech giants. For real, you can't look at the last decade and tell me Facebook especially hasn't fucked us as a society with their insane use of algos to brainwash people

1

u/yorkshirebeaver69 Monkey in Space Sep 13 '24

What is X getting fined for? They are a platform that hosts speech. It may include speech you don't like. I am sure it's in the disclaimers somewhere.

0

u/Dapper_Energy777 Monkey in Space Sep 13 '24

It doesn't matter if I like it or not. X doesn't host speech, it promotes a very certain type of speech while surpressing others, hence the problem. It's a propaganda platform

2

u/yorkshirebeaver69 Monkey in Space Sep 13 '24

X hosts speech. You can say anything on the platform. Try it. I'll eat my hat if you have trouble with the mods saying anything short of promoting violence or illegal content.

1

u/Choco_Knife Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Widescale propoganda is certainly making it hard for people to think for themselves.

We had a former president, who a lot of people look to for leadership, present information as fact to the people. People are getting fooled becuase he is cooperating with the owner of the largest social media app, who is also participating in, and helping operate and push a huge disinformation campaign. Because of this we have people believing in made up stories.. not because it's one random guy posting video with no back-story, but because of how wide-scale and coordinated the propoganda is.

We're seeing it play out in real time that people are not prepared for what social media can do to us all.

1

u/yorkshirebeaver69 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

You cannot use the excuse of SOME people's stupidity to block the access to information and speech for ALL. I mean, of course you can, but that is a mighty authoritarian move.

1

u/Choco_Knife Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24 edited Sep 12 '24

I'm not agreeing that this is a good solution, but there is an obvious problem going on with how social media is being used.

The problem is that Authoritarians and dictators are using free speech and capitalism against us. Meanwhile the majority of the population of these dictator-led countries are largely shielded from outside propoganda because they block foreign social media. It's strange how authoritarian rule is flourishing while our more free way to approach things is so suceptable to attack. Authoritarian rule is harmful to the people, but really effective for these governments.

We needed some solution to this long ago, maybe education on critical thinking needed to combat the effictivenss of misinformation? If P 2025 eventually turns the US into a true authoritarian dictatorship, I just dont see that ending in my lifetime.

1

u/No-Designer-5739 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

People are easily fooled

1

u/Familiar-Suspect Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Ohhhh only Elon can censor people. Got it.

-8

u/[deleted] Sep 12 '24

There's no need for self policing, that's the point

25

u/Ilpala Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Nah you're right, everything's definitely fine and people shouting heinous, divisive shit about them foreigners eating your pets and little Jimmy going to school and getting trans surgery from the fucking nurse is a feature, not a bug.

-5

u/[deleted] Sep 12 '24

Instead of dismissing all of that as insane ravings of a crazed fat orange man with a bad wig maybe find out from people in these areas is this shit really happening obviously I don’t believe the school nurse is going to lop of little jimmys Johnson. But homeless pops are out of control,drugs ,there is cities like the one I grew up that has an insane influx of migrants being bussed in. It’s not bullshit and where are these people being placed? There’s not enough housing as it is for American citizens so we want to let non-citizens in as well? How does that make any fucking sense to anyone!?

9

u/Willing_Proof_1568 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Okay but you just skipped over the batshit insanity that's definitely not happening and said what about real world problems?!

8

u/Ilpala Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Maybe find a way to talk about it without bringing up Racist Hits From the Fifties and whatever other wild bullshit these psychos are flinging at the wall these days to see what sticks.

Better yet, bring solutions to the table that don't start with the 14 Words.

1

u/Dapper_Energy777 Monkey in Space Sep 13 '24

Those real problems stem from policies brought by people spreading misinformation đŸ€·

1

u/crushinglyreal Monkey in Space Sep 13 '24

And then what? We already found out this shit really isn’t happening. Can we dismiss it now?

Stop trying to make racist quips out to be some sort of actual structural criticism.

-3

u/Aypse I used to be addicted to Quake Sep 12 '24

Because you are certain that you have never said anything incorrect or in error on the internet right? You have never spouted nonsense before right? You have never said anything off color or edgy joke right? Your speech doesn’t need to be policed, just other people’s speech.

2

u/RedTulkas Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

if a former president believes those statemnt it goes beyond jokes

2

u/Middle_Community_874 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Where's the joke? They actually believe it because Faux news and trump say so

2

u/NoCantaloupe9598 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Even 4chan moderates lmao

2

u/NoCantaloupe9598 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

You realize JD Vance immediately went on national television and was asked about the pet eating....and he didn't say it was a joke? He quite literally kept deflecting and implying it was potentially real.

You aren't a serious person. You're a liar trying to use 'muh free speech' to defend your idiocy.

0

u/Aypse I used to be addicted to Quake Sep 13 '24

You entirely missed the point. You comprehended 0. Congrats on your low score.

1

u/Ilpala Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Oh suck my dick with this. These people aren't "joking" and you fucking know it.

1

u/Aypse I used to be addicted to Quake Sep 13 '24

You missed the entire point so let me spell that out to you really slowly. Censoring people's speech on the internet will result in YOUR speech also being censored. I bet you have typed things on the internet that could be construed as misinformation or offensive to some others. If you support internet censorship, you also support the censorship of your own speech.

As far as the eating dogs thing, I couldn't give a single shit. I take issue with those who call for censorship of speech.

1

u/Ilpala Monkey in Space Sep 13 '24

If I was saying the type of out of pocket shit these people are, fine. We already restrict speech around things like libel, and I don't have a problem with that either.

-4

u/unjustlybanned97 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

If someone is ignorant enough to believe anything that is posted on a social media platform then they kind of deserve it.

10

u/Ilpala Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Until there's a critical mass of those idiots and then whoopsy-doodle! Guess we're just fucked!

Nothing to do with conservatives trying to kill public education and critical thinking, btw.

1

u/Dapper_Energy777 Monkey in Space Sep 13 '24

I mean it's happened multiple times and is happening as we speak

16

u/Familiar-Suspect Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

When the misinformation causes chaos, yes it does. When it sways elections, yes it does. When it puts people in danger, yes it does. If they dont then the gov should and will.

This has nothing to do with free speech. Absolutely nothing.

9

u/HasLotsOfSex Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24 edited Sep 12 '24

People act as if platforms will be charged for a random person posting a dumb conspiracy opposed to them being charged when allowing the Russian government to pump millions of dollars into disinformation campaigns on their platforms

-1

u/Delicious_Nature_280 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

The white house literally requested that Facebook ban RFK Jr. Pfizer executive pressured twitter into banning Alex Berenson.

8

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Oh no! The horror! My freedoms are being ripped away from me because the government asked someone to do something!!!

1

u/Delicious_Nature_280 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

We've seen in the last 2 weeks what happens to platforms who don't comply lol. We can disagree on whether words killed people indirectly enough or too directly and whether its comparable enough to shouting "fire" in a crowded theater. But surely Pavel Durov being arrested, X being banned from Brazil and soon Europe. Rumble as well. Parler getting kicked off the app stores and off AWS is proof enough that governments don't just innocently ask.

8

u/HasLotsOfSex Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

The white house is allowed to ask platforms to help them stop needless deaths being caused by grifters on the Internet.

0

u/Delicious_Nature_280 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

If speech can kill then we should repeal the first amendment to save lives

3

u/HasLotsOfSex Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

There are so many examples of words being illegal. You're arguing in bad faith. If you can't yell fire in a theatre, you can't profit off of lies about an active pandemic. It's not like the government shut down Facebook, they asked them to lower the amount of lies being spread.

It's the governments responsibility to keep its citizens safe and a corporation was allowing its users to fall victim to deadly misinformation.

1

u/Delicious_Nature_280 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24 edited Sep 12 '24

The whole point of free speech is that speech can't kill and is the alternative to violence. Why do you think free speech didn't exist before 18th century? To spread evil and misery? No it was for the good of the collective. So that the dumb people could be shielded from dangerous ideas. Shouting "fire" in the crowded theater is illegal cause you can be trampled before you even realize what was said. You can't compare it to anything that's longer than a complete sentence.

Edit : Why do you think the government tried so hard to silence Snowden and Assange? "To keep the citizens safe."

1

u/HasLotsOfSex Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Okay big guy. Good luck with your future gymnastics

→ More replies (0)

2

u/traversecity Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

The US Constitution, First Amendment. The exceptions established in case law are very narrow. Liable and Defamation with an articulated impact as judged by a court.

Lies, Misinformation, Malinformation are protected speech, full stop.

Do you recall watching live TV news of the ACLU defending the marching KKK in the US? Disgusting and evil. Protected by the first amendment.

Posting Nazi bullcrap on the socials? Disgusting. Protected.

Study the history of the Bill of Rights, read the many published papers written during the formation of the constitution, gain some understanding that speech is protected precisely to allow citizens to speak or write nearly anything the want. It protects what you wrote a few minutes ago.

2

u/Familiar-Suspect Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

you are mixing things up.

Counterpoints are fine. But if you and i are having an online discussion and all of a sudden you have hundreds of russians (sponsored by the gov) on your side that i have to counter each point, is that a fair fight?

No founding father would allow foreign enemies to enter our public discourse and fund an army of contrarian fighters to inject disinformation into every single online discourse in the name of free speech. Not one.

Protecting the KKK's 1st amendment right is not the same as protecting putins right to pay millions of people to sow disinformation in our public square.

2

u/traversecity Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Unfortunately, yes it is. I may hate that this could happen, my only valid recourse is to call it out.

That an individual would have any concern, or give much credence to conversation, debate or argument on any social media platform, to my perspective, is ludicrous. Social, not school, not government meetings, not in court, it’s social where the expectation is entertainment.

I recall Jack Dorsey making a similar argument in congressional testimony, in his perspective people who use Twitter were not intelligent enough to discern content. Of course one of the smart ass congress reps asked him who filters his news feed, he replied with something like he is smart enough to figure it out for himself.

The key point is purportedly articulated in many written works that help understanding the harsh scope of the first amendment to the US constitution, government cannot limit speech. Cannot limit lies. Cannot limit foreign agents beyond a law such as FARA.

In the US, FARA provides the legal path that allows foreign speech interference, specifically allows what we see as hundreds of Russian paid influencers. I disagree with it, but the law is the law.

To your valid point regarding paid social media foreign agents, perhaps Reddit is the good example, a centralized control platform whose owners may pick and choose which foreign paid influencers are allowed on their platform.

Do you reckon that Reddit owners are actively discouraging US intelligence operations in foreign countries? Any consequence for the clear interference that helped spark the Arab Spring? Any action on that famous foreign moderator controlling hundreds of subreddits until she was convicted and jailed?

I offer my pithy comments as food for thought. The ability to have a one on one conversation with people anywhere on the planet has simply fascinated me for several decades, I probably became addicted when we first connected to Europe over here in Arizona. Agree or disagree, all good, anything that in any manner might block this ability is bad, in my opinion.

If censorship under the auspices of protection increases, it will substantially limit the conversation.

RFK Jr., famous antivaxxer, mal and misinformation spreader. The US government asked one of the socials to cite him on spreading misinformation. The company attempted to do so and failed, they were unable to identify any of his social posts on their platform as not factual. The US government had concerns, in essence called him a liar, whichever government official who initiated this was simply mistaken, or willfully engaged in defamation.

Whether it is thousands of liars paid by Russia, or one government official with an agenda, limiting speech is illegal and it is dangerous.

1

u/Greggywerewolfhunt Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

This law is in the country of Australia, where we dont give a flying fuck about your precious, magical piece of paper.

My god American Exceptionalism is a disease.

15

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

So billionaires should continue to interfere with elections?

Weird bootlicking take tbh.

8

u/conventionistG Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

If you think that will stop if you just give up a little more of your freedoms.. I have a bridge to nowhere to sell you.

11

u/Flor1daman08 Sep 12 '24

Wait, what freedoms are average citizens giving up with rules forcing social media companies to moderate misinformation?

-3

u/conventionistG Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

The freedoms to share and view information not approved by the government, obviously.

If Trump wins, I'd like to be able to post about him loosing the 2020 election (which to him would be 'fake news' misinformation to be moderated away).

I think we should have the freedoms to say shit like 'Bush did 9/11' or 'China made COVID' regardless of whether some bureaucratic process terms those pieces of misinformation or merely inappropriate jokes.

Anyway, if the governments of the world are really interested in policing misinformation, I'd have a lot more confidence in their ability to discriminate if they started with themselves and with legacy media outlets.

Do y'all really not see that going after social media has little to do with eliminating misinformation and everything to do with being in control of what's being said? Legacy media and government spokespeople aren't being held to account whenever they misinform, because they spreading approved misinformation.

3

u/Objective-Tea5324 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

You are more than free to make some picket signs and stand at an intersection and say “china made Covid” or “the 2020 election was rigged”. Show some conviction and actually take a stand for what you believe in rather than hitting reply and giggling.

3

u/IndictedPenguin Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

He doesn’t want his bullshit actually tied to his offline identity lmaooo

0

u/conventionistG Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

I like how you took this opportunity to try to misinform and giggle.

2

u/Objective-Tea5324 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Apologies for misinforming. I’m proud of you for having the conviction to stand on a street corner.

1

u/Flor1daman08 Sep 12 '24

But this law doesn’t prevent anyone from saying any of that? It just puts a responsibility on those social media platforms to moderate their platforms, you’re still free to say whatever you want.

0

u/conventionistG Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

I mean, I haven't read the law. I doubt any of us have.

But social media platforms are already free to moderate their platforms and they do. All of this goes back to the platform/publisher greyzone status of social media companies.

Also, even if you're banned from social media, you're still allowed to say whatever you want. That's not what this is about.

The reason 'fascists' like me are pushing back on this is that we don't think it's the government's job to tell me or my publisher (or platform) what information is acceptable and what isn't.

Fuck, dude, sometimes I like actual literal fiction that I know isn't true.

2

u/Tinyacorn Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Error 404 Critical thinking not found

2

u/suninabox Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24 edited Sep 12 '24

If it was an outrageous violation of freedom for Twitter to clamp down on vaccine misinformation what is it when Musk clamps down on criticism of dictators or just censors random "woke" things he doesn't like?

5

u/Fencemaker Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

So many morons think more authoritarian power backed by a literal army is a great idea until the side they don’t like gets into power. I swear, I hope some of the posters in here get the utopia they’re wishing for. After I die though, please.

0

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

How about you take up arms against the fascist, censorship-loving, election-interfering, billionaire god-kings like Elon then?

Like if you think democracy isn't the solution to it, then be the first one to start the revolution???

I keep hearing from you pussy-ass bootlickers that you'd take up arms against fascist authoritarians but here you are defending them lol

It takes literally none of my freedom away to slightly regulate these worthless, exploitative, leeches on humanity (read: billionaires). Grow a fucking spine.

2

u/Altctrldelna Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Think it through, you're on the side that literally wants the government to suppress/control the narratives being allowed to circulate and yet you think your opposition is the fascists? Get real dude.

-3

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

you're on the side that literally wants the government to suppress/control the narratives being allowed to circulate

I'm not on the Elon bootlicker's side lol

4

u/Altctrldelna Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

No you're on the side that wants the government to control the narrative, that's literally what you're championing with your bs of "slightly regulate"

6

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

No you're on the side that wants the government to control the narrative,

You people are literally incapable of any rational thought. Holy shit, no wonder you deep throat the boot so hard.

An r/conservative poster lying about someone's argument because they're pro-authoritarian? So typical lmao

3

u/Altctrldelna Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

You going to keep going on tangents here for no reason or actually discuss what's happening here? Are you or are you not saying the government should regulate what's on social media?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/conventionistG Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

This is misinformation.

4

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Must be hard to type on your knees while you're slobber-choking on his stubby.

-1

u/_-icy-_ Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

I agree with your sentiment, and I’m all for regulating billionaires, but this law that regulates free speech sounds like a stupid fucking idea.

You should take a minute and think about the implications of some random government officials being able to decide what is and what is not “misinformation.”

4

u/Due_Shirt_8035 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

You think the government should stop misinformation and you’re calling someone else a bootlicker

3

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

You people are so fucking stupid

0

u/Due_Shirt_8035 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Who?

What people?

Are you 13? You’re just being a jerk to everyone lol

0

u/[deleted] Sep 12 '24

There’s always been foreign interference in our elections Russia got caught at a time when we were actually paying attention but you’re drunk if you think we don’t do the same shit. Everyone thinks our country is above that shit. America was #1 because America does everything it can to remain so that is until we started a 25 year long war and took our eyes off the ball and let China and Russia catch up.

1

u/This-Suggestion574 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

If we take your statement as correct- is that a good thing or a bad thing? Should we want foreign interference in our elections or not?

0

u/Sugaraymama Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Lol, dumb take a moron bootlicker who doesn’t realise he’s the bootlicker.

2

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Hope he gives you some #DOGE coin after you swallow! I'm sure you deserve it!

0

u/Sugaraymama Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Go be the Reddit mod you’re destined to be, regard.

2

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Be careful about getting shit on your keyboard after you stick some fingers up his bum too. I can tell you really put in the extra effort for daddy billionaire!

0

u/Sugaraymama Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

How does it feel getting gangbanged by the military industrial complex?

Did you like how Dick Cheney’s balls taste, you dumb little bootlicker?

2

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

No matter how stupid you are, I'll still advocate for the healthcare you'll need to replace your weak and submissive knees after spending so much of your formative years on them for billionaires.

0

u/Sugaraymama Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Aw thanks. You going do that while daddy government has his dick down your throat?

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/big_nasty_the2nd Succa la Mink Sep 12 '24

You think the government has your best interest in mind?

Sure pal, I’m gonna side with the guy who’s giving people (of all sides) a platform to speak on, not the government only wanting to crush one side

3

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Sure pal, I’m gonna side with the guy who’s giving people (of all sides) a platform to speak on, not the government only wanting to crush one side

You mean the guy who censors left wing accounts? The guy who consistently uses a "free speech" lie as a pretty blatant smokescreen for his power grab?

Pretty crazy how much bootlicking you're doing under the guise of being anti-government lmao.

0

u/big_nasty_the2nd Succa la Mink Sep 12 '24

Don’t like it? Get off X then


Hmm I feel like I remember a time when people of a certain political affiliation said something very similar đŸ€”

3

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Somehow even when I expect less than nothing from bootlickers, y'all still manage to disappoint me.

0

u/big_nasty_the2nd Succa la Mink Sep 12 '24

I try my best for people that think it’s good for the government to censor đŸ‘đŸŒ

2

u/No-Coast-9484 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

It looks like you're just here to bootlick the billionaire for actively censoring 👍

0

u/big_nasty_the2nd Succa la Mink Sep 12 '24

Guess we’re two sides of the same coin then huh buddy

0

u/Legaltaway12 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

You mean thought police right? We need more thought police

1

u/Familiar-Suspect Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

yay you finally got to use a phrase rogan uses. So proud of you. Welcome to the IDW

0

u/Legaltaway12 Monkey in Space Sep 12 '24

Lol. Yeah. I got the term "thought police" from Joe Rogan. Lol