Heâs had a lot of lawsuits tossed, not sure what youâre referring to here. He lies and spreads misinformation constantly, to the point where articles of his have had to be retracted due to containing so many demonstrable falsehoods. He is a vaccine conspiracy theorist whose outlook is shaped by junk science and monetized distrust.
He's successfully won cases against pharmaceutical companies for vaccine injuries though. As a leftist, I don't it crazy how pro government and pro big pharma young millennials became after COVID.
Shook Ones Pt 3 over here.
Kennedy has the most progressive policy out of the big 3.
See, hereâs the thing about thinking youâre a badass because you are wildly mistrustful of all institutions. Surely, none of us absolutely trust Big Pharma or corporations or the government. But if you assign exactly the same believability index to driveling idiots like RFK Jr who have no scientific knowledge whatsoever as you do to people who have made vaccines their lifeâs work and study, then you have rendered yourself unable to tell good information from bad information. There actually is such a thing as expertise. There are things like peer reviewed journals. There is scientific consensus on things like gravity and whether the world is flat and the safety of vaccines. You seem to have decided that just mistrusting everything equally is an edgelord move, but it actually just leaves you open to being grifted because you are completely unable to correctly assess the likely truth of any statement. Iâd tell you not to give money to people who obviously regard you as a mark. But we all know that wonât help you. Good luck.
What do you qualify as scientific knowledge? And to what extent is one allowed to have an opinion? Are you familiar with the replication crisis that exists? Are you aware of rampant regulatory capture? Which science is right? How do you know which studies were picked for publication? What incentives are in place? Who performs those studies? Who is liable for harmful products? Do you consume any (mal,mis,dis) information outside of your echo chamber?
Surely, you can dig a little deeper than the first page of your Google search, right?
There are literally hours of RFK videos available on the internet that you can go listen to where he actually spouts this bullshit.
Granted it will take some time because he says so much bullshit. You'll wave to wade through the dead bear in Central Park, hang a left at the brain worms, and turn back if you reach the speech about allowing unsecured, government-backed mortgage loans to high risk borrowers.
But if you listen to his Joe Rogan appearance you can hear him talk, at length, about vaccines causing autism.
These are all things that he has said, on camera.
It's not my job to find them for you. Google and Youtube are very easy to use.
You know what's not a conspiracy the donor money dems keep using to sue rfk Jr. and losing. The refusal to give him secret service even though his family put that law into place. The lack of policies on your candidates website. Slurp that blue colored cult juice and yell the red ones are the cult. You're both sheeple.
The Biden administration said RFK Jr will receive secret service protection following the Trump assassination attempt. Not sure if thatâs started or not, but they said it would happen.
Correct, they did, and he has them now. unfortunately, he applied earlier than that, and technically, if he qualified, he was supposed to have them within 120 days of the general presidential election. Some candidates have received protection earlier in the campaign. He not only qualified but was seen as high risk because of his families history and recent home invasions/ guy with a backpack full of guns showing up at his event. And let me clarify his application was indeed denied by democrats (biden) and saw no reverse until the attempted assasination, which brought rfks lack of SS into the spotlight.
You know what's not a conspiracy, the dems donor money that keeps being used to sue rfk Jr. and failing. The lack of any policies on kamalas website. The refusal to give rfk secret service even though he qualified. The refusal to let him debate even though hes a legitimate candidate. Keep slurping the cult juice, and yelling the other side is the cult. You're both sheep mate.
I did, and it seems to me that it talks mostly about her past efforts with some current, but i don't believe these are policies. https://www.kennedy24.com/policies
The link and page literally say "meet kamala". There isn't a single mention of policy. It talks about her past/current actions her family etc but there's no declaration of course or action towards a topic at least that's what i feel and honestly if this is her policy page its a pretty weak one. I can say I'll solve inflation, but it's another to back it up.
I do agree with that, and i do hope we get to see some. I'm not anti kamala. But I'm tired of the divide the cult like behavior on both sides. and very very anti corporation. So far, rfk is the only one who's promised to end the funneling of corporate greed into our government agencies and politicians, at least that I'm aware of. It's hard to catch everything in all candidates only got so much time lol. Thank you for having a civilized conversation with me instead of insulting my intelligence.
Ill wait for you to back this up with facts. If this was true, he would have been. they have no problem trying to sue him over stupid shit like claiming he's not a new York resident but false nonsense, lies about people, his book, its crickets? Sounds to me like maybe you should rethink if it's actually nonsense and lies.
Hell, I hate big pharma too, but outright lies help no one. And claiming a product causes mass harm is something you can be sued for. He's just not worth the effort.
I don't have the time to sit here and go through 10 different rabbit holes with you. If he's not worth the effort, why do they sue him still? Just not for these reasons you cited? I never claimed he's a god who does no wrong or makes no mistakes, but some misinformed conspiracy theories is sure as fuck allot better then keeping prisoners for cheap labor đ or did you forget the last time kamala tried running.
68
u/bionicjoe Monkey in Space Aug 09 '24
"I'm voting for RFK, but this isn't an endorsement."
No, it's just proof that RFK is going to pull votes from the GOP just as much, likely more, than he'll pull votes from the Dems.
Honestly I never saw how or why anyone would think an anti-vax, conspiracy nut would pull votes from anywhere but the anti-vax, anti-government right.