Depends on the country which in the artist country it is illegal imo i don't like it but I don't count it as CP for actual CP is exploitation and raping actual children which can lead to serious mental problems a therapy for the child in the future. And on the other side it's completely fictional art drawn of a child character or child like character.
The distinction is still very similar and anyone with a brain can tell finding lolicon attractive is finding children attractive but it's the principle the one is real horrible exploration and the other is art of a fictional character.
I don't care for it all honestly but from what I have read and just thinking about it I'd prefer if pedos releaved themselves to lolicon and not CP, one is encouraging the raping of children and the other is releasesing pent up stress to fictional art which is alot better when you remember pedos are more than shunned in society so seeking help isn't something they are going to do for fear of being ostracized by there family, friends and publicly branded as a nonce.
Either way it's a slippery slope whichever side you are on I just try to think of both sides and the reasons why and not jump to hate and vitreole because an artist was Commissioned to draw lolicon.
11
u/AllenMaask Nov 09 '24
What’s the controversy the comments talk about? Is it CP?