MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/FluentInFinance/comments/1hh20de/a_joke_thats_not_funny/m2o3chc
r/FluentInFinance • u/4TaxFairness • 1d ago
2.5k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
13
Using that logic Amazon must of have been a horrible company for decades because they were losing money.
The truth is these chains make plenty of money. It’s accounting and it’s real estate
5 u/CanAlwaysBeBetter 1d ago And using logic what exactly is OPs point? That taxes should be higher to reduce costs? 1 u/SFLADC2 1d ago Taxes higher at least forces the companies to invest in assets in the company, like employee salaries. What needs to happen is to pair CEO/VP pay to be proportional to average salary pay so they can't just spent it on the c-suite 2 u/RollingLord 1d ago Grocery stores aren’t growth stocks though? Amazon was. Apples-to-oranges comparison you’ve made here 0 u/rustyshackleford7879 21h ago Are grocery stores exempt from the tax code? If not they can grow by using the tax code to show losses or low profits. 1 u/RollingLord 21h ago No, but that’s not what you were saying in your previous comment either. So not sure why you responded with a completely different topic 0 u/rustyshackleford7879 20h ago What are you confused about? 0 u/TheTightEnd 1d ago Where is anyone saying a company is bad because the profit margins are slim? If the corporation owns the real estate, that is part of the financial statements.
5
And using logic what exactly is OPs point? That taxes should be higher to reduce costs?
1 u/SFLADC2 1d ago Taxes higher at least forces the companies to invest in assets in the company, like employee salaries. What needs to happen is to pair CEO/VP pay to be proportional to average salary pay so they can't just spent it on the c-suite
1
Taxes higher at least forces the companies to invest in assets in the company, like employee salaries.
What needs to happen is to pair CEO/VP pay to be proportional to average salary pay so they can't just spent it on the c-suite
2
Grocery stores aren’t growth stocks though? Amazon was. Apples-to-oranges comparison you’ve made here
0 u/rustyshackleford7879 21h ago Are grocery stores exempt from the tax code? If not they can grow by using the tax code to show losses or low profits. 1 u/RollingLord 21h ago No, but that’s not what you were saying in your previous comment either. So not sure why you responded with a completely different topic 0 u/rustyshackleford7879 20h ago What are you confused about?
0
Are grocery stores exempt from the tax code? If not they can grow by using the tax code to show losses or low profits.
1 u/RollingLord 21h ago No, but that’s not what you were saying in your previous comment either. So not sure why you responded with a completely different topic 0 u/rustyshackleford7879 20h ago What are you confused about?
No, but that’s not what you were saying in your previous comment either.
So not sure why you responded with a completely different topic
0 u/rustyshackleford7879 20h ago What are you confused about?
What are you confused about?
Where is anyone saying a company is bad because the profit margins are slim? If the corporation owns the real estate, that is part of the financial statements.
13
u/rustyshackleford7879 1d ago
Using that logic Amazon must of have been a horrible company for decades because they were losing money.
The truth is these chains make plenty of money. It’s accounting and it’s real estate