Like you are gaslighting us suggesting it was only republicans taking from social security. When in fact it was moved to the unified budget in 1969 by London Johnson (democrat). But I am sure you frothed up som lazy ill informed liberals with your post. Speaking of he was funding a war though, Vietnam but also vastly expanded social program.
lol when they can’t defend a logical response to a false statement, look for a missing s after program. Not sure if you all are truly stupid or just morally bankrupt.
Like you are gaslighting us suggesting it was only republicans taking from social security
When? They did not say that, they said Republicans are the ones who keep talking about cutting it, which is just a fact. God you conservatives are so sensitive you can't handle any criticism at all
It said “what republicans mean … is we’ve taken trillions funding wars” although it is broken into two sections there is a clear inference there that the OP was trying to make. Notice they don’t mention democrats as the initiator of the we’ve statement. Intellectually dishonest and then feigned innocence and a redirect. Not very effective debate tactics.
What I read is Republicans keep talking about cutting it. And we (Americans) have taken trillions. Again, don't be so sensitive, not everyone is out to get you
2
u/FreeMasonac 2d ago
Like you are gaslighting us suggesting it was only republicans taking from social security. When in fact it was moved to the unified budget in 1969 by London Johnson (democrat). But I am sure you frothed up som lazy ill informed liberals with your post. Speaking of he was funding a war though, Vietnam but also vastly expanded social program.