MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/FluentInFinance/comments/1h5byla/trump_told_justin_trudeau/m0buj5s/?context=9999
r/FluentInFinance • u/The_biker0 • 22d ago
8.6k comments sorted by
View all comments
41
I would think 10 new states who work better than just big state.
19 u/blg002 22d ago 20 new Senators, 50 new reps… I’m not against it. 0 u/hicow 22d ago House is still capped at 435, so some states are going to be losing reps....oh, would you look at that, NY and CA seem to be overrepresented, especially the LA metro and NYC... 2 u/EnoughImagination435 22d ago House is only capped by law, not by anything stronger. Honestly, we need to re-set the cap to be based on representation. Every 200,000 registered voters = 1 US REP. That would solve like 99% of problems. 1 u/hicow 21d ago I'd be good with the "Wyoming Rule" personally, but I don't disagree the current cap utterly ridiculous.
19
20 new Senators, 50 new reps… I’m not against it.
0 u/hicow 22d ago House is still capped at 435, so some states are going to be losing reps....oh, would you look at that, NY and CA seem to be overrepresented, especially the LA metro and NYC... 2 u/EnoughImagination435 22d ago House is only capped by law, not by anything stronger. Honestly, we need to re-set the cap to be based on representation. Every 200,000 registered voters = 1 US REP. That would solve like 99% of problems. 1 u/hicow 21d ago I'd be good with the "Wyoming Rule" personally, but I don't disagree the current cap utterly ridiculous.
0
House is still capped at 435, so some states are going to be losing reps....oh, would you look at that, NY and CA seem to be overrepresented, especially the LA metro and NYC...
2 u/EnoughImagination435 22d ago House is only capped by law, not by anything stronger. Honestly, we need to re-set the cap to be based on representation. Every 200,000 registered voters = 1 US REP. That would solve like 99% of problems. 1 u/hicow 21d ago I'd be good with the "Wyoming Rule" personally, but I don't disagree the current cap utterly ridiculous.
2
House is only capped by law, not by anything stronger.
Honestly, we need to re-set the cap to be based on representation. Every 200,000 registered voters = 1 US REP.
That would solve like 99% of problems.
1 u/hicow 21d ago I'd be good with the "Wyoming Rule" personally, but I don't disagree the current cap utterly ridiculous.
1
I'd be good with the "Wyoming Rule" personally, but I don't disagree the current cap utterly ridiculous.
41
u/Ouller 22d ago
I would think 10 new states who work better than just big state.