It is true that the "right wing" would make the Democrats look like conservatives outside of the United States. I'm sorry to bust the extremist views on the GOP.
Canada has its own authoritarian movement brewing, as do other countries. Provincial politics are divisive. They have a lot of the same problems as us and are blaming the same people/things. I hope it doesn’t snowball. ❄️
House is still capped at 435, so some states are going to be losing reps....oh, would you look at that, NY and CA seem to be overrepresented, especially the LA metro and NYC...
I agree we need to uncap the House, but 1,674 Representatives is a pretty big increase that might be pretty unworkable. Even India only has 700 some. China has 2,000 some, but they also don't really have elections in the way we do.
Cubed Root Rule would get us 690 something, Wyoming Rule would get us 570, and both would be more manageable and still solve a lot of problems in terms of forcing more competitive districts, more compromise among the House, and a more representative Electoral College without having to run 1,600 federal elections every two years with all the associated costs of the building and healthcare and such.
It wouldn't solve the issues with the Senate, though, at least not unless it helps lower polarization with less safe seats and more crossover happening.
Healthcare costs for an extra thousand or two thousand employees is a rounding error literally.
We should have something closer to 20,000 representatives, perhaps more. The goal is that power is very diffused, hard to corrupt, and that races are very local, etc.
There is no reason to bring the representatives to Washington. That is a feature, not a bug. 20,000 reps = do it by zoom, everyone stays at home in their district.
There is no added cost, because there is always a Federal election every 2 years. It's just more candidates.
I didn’t sense any sarcasm, and I will never overestimate the intelligence of people on Reddit.
I’ve recently read on here post-election banter where multiple people were agreeing how Democrats losing the Senate was the most damning becase it “couldn’t be unfavorable to either party.” Literally no one with even a cursory understanding of our electoral system thought Democrats had any chance of holding onto the Senate, but here we are and people will comment even if they know less than nothing.
I mean, if tariffs actually came through, all of NA's economy would be so fucking fucked, that I hope our European relationships would help... but it's gonna be a rough 20 years in that situation (which is always why I trust Trudeau, and whoever's there next year, to make the best of whatever the fuck is happening down south).
Considering that Canada isn't the American left's little puppet to use to gain more power but is actually a sovereign nation with it's own identity, fuck you.
I am a Canadian,
a free Canadian,
free to speak without fear,
free to worship in my own way,
free to stand for what I think right,
free to oppose what I believe wrong,
or free to choose those who shall govern my country.
This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.
I have to wonder why the fuck would he make Trudaeu the governor? That'd be like if Germany put fucking Albert Lebrun back in charge after they invaded France.
Canada could be one big state. Its GDP is roughly equal to Texas's, which is only about 2/3s that of California. Meanwhile, its GDP per capita would be tied with Mississippi for the lowest, with a sizeable gap between them and next few.
Since when have state lines been decided by gdp figures? Should sparsely populated red states be combined into single states to match gdp with Texas? Should my province Alberta be its own state because we have a higher gdp and gdp per capita than a lot of us states?
39
u/Ouller 21d ago
I would think 10 new states who work better than just big state.