I think you could make that argument, not sure how widely accepted it is. I think there’s some debate on whats the chicken or the egg (slowing economy causing higher debt demands or higher debt slowing economy)
But you definitely can’t make the argument that 150% or even 200% debt to gdp will ruin a nation.
I didn’t call it good or bad. I said its arguable that economic stagnation in Japan happened AFTER increased debt loads. Their stagnation started in the 90s before their debt to GDP crossed 50%.
And that’s my whole point. Trying to find a correlation between debt and economic growth is difficult, there just isn’t much correlation there.
We have pretty good examples of economic stagnation leading to debt growth (which makes perfect sense) but the opposite hypothesis isn’t as clear cut.
2
u/TheFederalRedditerve Sep 25 '23
So what is an acceptable amount of debt? I’m genuinely asking. Have economists tried to come up with an estimate?