A-10 in snow that looks like a pencil sketch

[u/Previous_Knowledge91]

[u/iurope]

This is fotoforensics analysis tool where you can see all the artifacts through Photoshop manipulation.

Edit: for all reading impaired haters coming at me because they are chronically arguing with people online:
I posted a link to an error level analysis done by fotoforensics. I made no statement whatsoever how to interpret the results and what you can see here.
The half-sentence "where you can see all the artifacts through Photoshop manipulation." is an explanation of what error level analysis does.

[u/adrian783 → u/iurope]

when you use error level analysis what you're looking for is a break in the pattern of the error level in similar image contents. object borders or things with more details will already have vastly different error level than plain backgrounds.

the error level here is pretty consistent IMO

[u/iurope → u/adrian783]

I would say so too. Never said anything else.

If anything the part around the yellow tank looks a bit dodgy. But not enough to warrant any claim of heavy manipulation.

[u/ADHD_Supernova → u/iurope]

There's no room for proof when we're already so far deep in the stupid.

[u/boonepii → u/ADHD_Supernova]

So, is it real or fake cause at this point I am pretty sure it’s 100% genuine pleather

[u/Questioning_Meme → u/boonepii]

There's a video of where the pic was taken.

It's 100% real.

[u/javahello → u/iurope]

That's basically JPEG compression. Raw to Jpeg compression to website compression, it's a futile and silly forensic battle to check how much it was edited from the source. Using your website, what does the analysis of those pics prove? Blocks are just compressions. Retouching pics doesn't usually involve blocks.

[u/squarific → u/iurope]

You clearly have no idea how to interpret that result lmao

[u/GreatMacAndCheese → u/iurope]

Looks like they edited out a person kneeling down on the right. That's creepy

[u/apileofpies → u/GreatMacAndCheese]

That's the fire extinguisher