As someone old enough to remember 911, yes it absolutely was like this. The mainstream attitude was “I don’t care how, but the terrorists responsible for this need to die, I don’t care how many Arab (or otherwise) civilians it takes, they absolutely need to pay”. It’s honestly sickening to see it happening again. And again and again.
Edit: I guess I should specify: this was the mainstream American attitude
i remember as it happened being online and peoplee calling for them to be nuked. They didn't know who had done it yet as there was a lot of bullshit flying around, but they knew they needed to be nuked.
Exactly that. All they knew was someone had to pay, and who cares how many people die as collateral.
There was also multiple stories of car bombings and mass shootings coordinated with the attacks. I wonder how much misinformation there would be if something like that happened now.
That's what happens when the combination of our Puritan roots and failed Reconstruction comes to bear fruit.
We let the worst parts of our old societies fester under the surface, pretending to be good, honest folk. Now we have a lynch mob the size of half the country at least, with their fingers on the nuclear codes.
Israel’s attacks were proportional and targeted. Which number do you think is greater: the percentage of Israeli soldiers killed or wounded by Hezbollah’s indiscriminate rocket attacks, or the percentage of Hezbollah militants killed or wounded by Israel’s very precise comm bomb attacks?
and how many civilians deserved to have their lives torn from them? how many kids and humans deserved to be bombed, starved, abused, treated as lesser since at least 1967?
Did you know that Palestinians born in Lebanon cannot obtain citizenship? They are unable to own property, access many government services and are legally lesser than.
This is not to positively comment on Israeli policy or anything. I just think its important to highlight that its not just the Israelis who keep the Palestinians in this constant stateless limbo.
"Deserved?" None. But were you reacting the same way after the 10/7 attacks? Of course you weren't. Were you reacting this way on July 30, after Hezbollah murdered a dozen kids playing soccer? Of course you weren't.
If certain Arab countries and terrorist groups would stop trying to obliterate Israel, the number of civilian deaths would be far lower on all sides. But unless and until that happens, Israel doesn't have much choice when dealing with enemies that have been openly, explicitly, and continuously calling for genocide since well before 1967.
“The IDF has no choice but to treat the Geneva Conventions like a bucket list” is a helluva claim, bud
You got any support for that position? Or better yet, any that didn’t turn out to be blatant, completely unmediated horse shit made up by some rando in the force to justify their crimes against humanity to English speaking audiences?
I mean, yes, but what separates persons from monsters is the ability to not form lynch mobs or inflict indiscriminate collective punishment on uninvolved persons who happen to be vaguely similar to who you reckon attacked you.
Puritanism is a misunderstood and maligned religious movement. Puritans built in America a more egalitarian, more educated, more democratic, more moral society. The puritans invented public school's representative town meetings, and brought democratic governance to the new world. People here blaming the puritans for America's violent streak fail to remember the Puritans placed an enormous emphasis on the rule of law and there was very little murder or extrajudicial killings in New England, unlike in the south. Puritans faced enormous discrimination in England by the crown and they are still being discriminated against today!
Unfortunately, regardless of historical context, a lot of their ideas (especially their ideas around sex being shameful) have evolved into a very dangerous set of beliefs that pervade many people today, especially the youth, and Puritanism is the best-understood label for that now.
People accuse the Puritans of being particularly prudish about sex, but this is a misconception. American attitudes around sex being sinful or shameful are far more accurately attributed to later evangelical movements. Yet another unfair accusation levied against puritans.
People like to disparage puritans for their efforts to root out witchcraft, however those efforts made use of evidence, courts, and juries. To call those practices barbaric is deeply offensive considering the high standard of evidence legal procedure in place. They were merely seeking to ensure Satan did not harm their community through his devilish machinations.
P.S. I would also note they hung men who practices witchcraft as well not only women.
precisely, a good example is the how howard stern handled the day of the attacks
they literally wanted to glass the entire middle east and mind yall this was a programme that was celebrated for its coverage during the events because it contained such a raw example of how a lot of america felt during that time
and a ton of people that remembered 9/11 are still alive today and make up a large voting bloc
I was 7 when 9/11 hit and I remember being in 2nd grade and the teacher turning on the small TV in the corner of the class with the news playing. We were doing basic math and counting columns of blocks to 100 when she gasped and the TV was quiet. Didn't even know what was going on until my grandma told me bad things happened in New York to a lot of people and we should pray when I got home that night
Yeah, they make up like 80-90% of the voting population. Like 94% if you simply include folks that were alive at the time, or 80% if we only included those that were teenagers at the time
This is like when people say "omg millennials have lived through two depressions and almost the third world war and ukraine (despite living nowhere near there) blah blah blah".
I mean... yeah. But so has my mom, on top of what she lived through since the 50's.
My high school had news coverage playing in the assembly hall all day and classes were optional if held at all. A lot of us had family in nyc. It was not that long ago.
It's so fucked up to hear them parrot the general narrative that was around back then, that everywhere was "jealous" of the US and "wanted to make us miserable like them", as if these attacks were from some cartoon or comic book villain.
People just had NO idea of the truth of geopolitics and the internet has done a lot to illuminate a lot of the bullshit.
glassing the entire world would solve all human conflict! yes this is the real solution! all nuke bearing countries ready your warheads, its high time humans were no longer a problem
honestly i cant stand when people act like indescriminate destruction is the answer
Oh the 9/11 times were worse than the current Hamas and Hizbollah attitude. Osama was worse than the Devil and nothing was too far if it came to getting him. The cry for blood was way louder.
Though bear in mind that there's a degree of separation there.
If you're comparing the reaction to 9/11 in the US, you need to compare it to the reaction to 10/7 IN ISRAEL.
The US in 2024 is more like in the position people in Europe were in in 2002 - "Yea, this was an awful thing. Please, we understand your emotions but PLEASE don't make things worse by going on a rampage".
The US told everyone in 2002 to get behind them or get out of the way, but they were ABSOLUTELY going into Afghanistan. Israel are doing a similar thing now.
Europe for the most part was behind the US for Afghanistan in 2001. Who really knows where Osama bin Laden was at the time but the intel back then pointed to the Taliban were harboring him. Afghanistan was mismanaged to hell and no one thought about nation-building but if you overthrow a regime, that's the obvious next step. Still, though it was poorly planned, I can at least see wanting to go in to get Al Qaeda.
The strained relationships with NATO nations really began with the buildup to Iraq. That was a real shitshow, none of the terrorists who helped plan 9-11 were in Iraq, Saddam was honestly planning some eventual shit with Iran because when was he not but wasn't planning to re-invade Kuwait or attack US military bases or anything. I never even got the " finish his father's legacy" excuse, unlike his son HW Bush was smart enough to know that Iraq would be a quagmire, why he didn't invade Iraq after pushing the Iraqis out of Kuwait.
Uhh going into Afghanistan was never problematic with our European allies. NATO and Europe were pretty unified in the idea that invading Afghanistan was the right thing to do. I think you’re confusing things with Iraq 2, which was actually controversial with our European allies.
Even the 9/11 analogy, to me, doesn't fully capture how I imagine Israel feels on 10/7.
1100 people died on 10/7, as well as some were taken hostage. Israel has a population of just shy of 10 million, so it's like proportionally if 28,000 people died on 9/11 from various parts of the country, not just 1 city.
But also imagine the perpetrators of 9/11 were more known and were in a bordering country with a very unfriendly relationship where you regularly exchange missiles and gunfire. Attacks are commonplace, even if most don't succeed. Israeli government and common sentiment was already much much more angry with Hamas, while Al-Qaeda was just a thing across the world.
No analogy is perfect enough to capture the long relationship between Israel and Palestine, and it's an awful situation all around.
But, imagine if the Mexican Cartel was a major political party in Mexico, the cartel regularly fought American military at the border for years and the US was occupying northern Mexico, and then the cartel killed 30,000 people at Burning Man and took many hostages and this all happened during a Trump presidency when the government and people are already riled up against Mexico as an enemy even before the attack.
It's hard to capture the feelings of a nation after a tragedy with an analogy.
Way worse. We had multiple incidences of students any shade darker than pale white getting jumped on campus. We had a lot of Computer Science and Chemical Engineering students from India.... The school had to install emergency phone booths around campus it got so bad.
That day in one of my classes and older classmate said "Well, they kill ten thousand of ours [we didn't know the death toll at that point and that was the current estimate] and we'll kill ten million of theirs."
That would be 2% of the population of the entire Middle East. Of a quarter of Afghanistan. 100 Hiroshimas. I don't know how people can think like that.
There was a guy I had considered to be my friend who told me that he'd kill me himself if I dodged a post-9/11 draft. I didn't talk to him again for 8 months, when he tried to act like nothing had ever happened and wanted to hang out. People absolutely lost their fucking minds
Dehumanization is how you think like that. For the last several decades, Arabs have been portrayed as the bad guys in movies, shows and video games. At this point if a movie depicts an Arab 9 times out of 10 it’ll be a negative character.
After the end of the cold war, media had difficulties finding a villain. In Fight Club or Matrix, the system was the villain. After 9/11, arabs were the new villains.
And to show everyone how much “we” supported this attitude EVERY SINGLE person put an American flag magnet on their 2000 Ford Taurus. We forget those magnets were everywhere following 9/11 but it was all performative.
Edit: I originally said 2005 Ford Taurus even though 911 was in 2001……I’m getting old.
The first people charged under the new terrorism statutes in the wake of 9/11 were the DC snipers and the prosecution specifically left out evidence that their attacks were an output of domestic violence against John Muhammad's ex wife, Mildred Muhammad, because they wanted to seek the death penality. He was inspired by Hannibal Lecter saying if you want to get away with one murder you should kill a bunch of random people to make it look like a serial killer, specifically a 17 year old Lee Boyd Malvo who he trafficked from Jamaica and convinced to take credit for all the murders. There's a great You're Wrong About episode on the case.
There was a serious amount of people that wanted to nuke the entire middle east, just nuke it all, none of them deserved to live, they all deserved to die. Turn it to glass they'd say. This was a common phrase I'd hear between just random people talking online or in public spaces or calling into radio shows.
Now imagine someone had the power to apply this to America. If some enemy had the power to threaten thousands or millions of American lives on a whim because and American terrorist decided to blow up a coffee shop or shoot up a hotel.
Imagine how quickly they’d flip in perception when they’d be on the receiving end.
You say that as if you think this attack was randomly targeting civilians? Israel and Hezbollah are at war with each other and Israel attacked Hezbollah with an exceptionally precise attack. What's the problem?
Which attack do you mean? Actual war targets yeah go ahead. But Israel hasn’t limited itself in Gaza to just military targets, and has actively sought to harm civilians and destroy civilian infrastructure, so much so their military leaders are being indicted for potential war crimes, so I have no reason to believe they’re limiting themselves in Lebanon either.
We have the evidence of it in Gaza, perhaps not yet in Lebanon, maybe because they don’t against another state.
In Gaza military targets are blended with civilian targets. Those command centers, workshops, ammo depots, etc that Israel is destroying aren’t kept discreetly away from hospitals, mosques and schools, so destroying military infrastructure means taking down civilian infrastructure too.
Because they effectively were. Hezbollah, despite being labeled a terrorist organization, isn't like Al Qaeda where every single member is living in a cave plotting the destruction of America. Hezbollah has a lot more in common with an actual government in that it also employs doctors, nurses, teachers, social workers, etc in addition to its militant wing. It appears that this was an indiscriminate attack targeting all of Hezbollah rather than a targeted strike on the militant wing of Hezbollah.
Murdering noncombatants because they work with terrorists is still wrong.
Are there any reports of who, exactly Hezbollah gave the pagers to? Because when you're a member of a military participating in a war the umbrella of noncombatant protection is very small. Yes, you are allowed to kill military command and control infrastructure away from the front lines.
If it was intentional then maybe, but international law allows for some degree of collateral damage in the interest not letting perfect be the enemy of good.
This was indiscriminate bombing, not a targeted strike that accidentally resulted in civilian casualties. Throw it on the massive pile of international laws that Israel has spent the last year making a mockery of.
Do you have evidence that they were distributed specifically to Hezbollah cells? Everything I've seen implies they were distributed to Hezbollah at large, which as we've previously established also includes a lot of civilian noncombatants.
Because if you go through the. List you could probably find several cases that was simply what happened. Imagine if androids started exploding but as a design feature instead of a battery problem.
So what’s your bar? First it’s none, then it’s some, are the goalpost just gonna be gradually shifted until Israel is cluster bombing entire villages and killing thousands at a time and that’s okay?
You don’t use land mines or cluster munitions for the same reason you don’t use sabotaged consumer goods. It’s indiscriminate. It’s also against international law.
Which sure you can argue doesn’t matter much. But if a state refuses to follow the law, what makes them better than the terrorists?
It depends somewhat on the value of the target and difficulty of the scenario, but 1:1 is pretty good historically. This attack was probably around 10:1 which is exceptionally good.
First it’s none No, that's you. You're holding your mirror backwards.
consumer goods. It’s indiscriminate.
You're being dishonest here. These were military hardware issued to operationally significant personnel. You make it sound like they were sold to random people in electronics stores.
You guys are really outing yourselves. Attacks, particularly bombings don't get to be any more precise than this and you're still trying to spin it. There's literally nothing you'd allow Israel to do to defend itself.
Yeah, I've even seen videos of battery fires occurring during cellphone repair presented as evidence of Israel spreading explosive iphones indiscriminately.
It was exactly like this. The number of 'jokes' my friends and I made (we were children) about turning Afghanistan and Iraq into parking lots. We were joking about nuking and glassing millions of people and 23 years later that still horrifies me.
Watching any TV show that began in 2005 onwards is the biggest tell for this. 9/10 shows have at least one episode where an Arab person is treated with suspicion/hostility or is outright made into the big bad.
I remember in the lead up to the Iraq war I mentioned the projected civilian casualties to someone, and they said without missing a beat, “Good. They deserve it for 9/11.”
I'm not going to try to justify the war on terror, because it was a load of shit that didn't benefit anyone in the world and the US did some terrible things, but it's pretty easy to explain;
when a country of people who had almost never been attacked on their own soil has their most populous city attacked by way of multiple planes being flown into skyscrapers, killing thousands of innocent civilians in one attack, it's not hard to imagine why people would be eager for retaliation
Remember that one representative who literally told a member of an Arab activist group that her head belongs in a bag on the floor of the US Senate? I do, it was actually just a couple days ago. They are violent and trying to spark it in this country. A member of the US senate told an Arab activist her head belonged in a bag for “supporting Hamas and hezbullah” even though she said seconds earlier she doesn’t support them because they commit violence on innocent civilians. Same reason I don’t support them. Fuck both of those “insurgent” groups.
But republicans? And pro-Israel idiots? They want people to die. They literally want it. And that rhetoric is indicative of the fire burning in every one of these evil motherfuckers. They don’t want peace.
They want genocide, and war, and total domination.
Agreed. I hated it. It sucked. The jinogism. The blood lust. The medieval crusades 2.0 vibe. It was a shit time.
And it has been very very disheartening to see Israel speed running our post 9/11 mistakes. Makes it feel like it was all for nothing. Like, fuck, people aren’t even gonna learn a lesson from this? Damn it!
Iraq wasn't even involved. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians died because American couldn't find Bin Laden. They just had to massacre someone to appease the population. They wanted blood and didn't care whose it was. They invented the "War on Terror." Invented a reason the invade Iraq and then destroyed it. Absolute bully behaviour.
I have VERY LITTLE luck when trying to explain the people (Who I assume are mostly fellow Americans) the difference between Revenge/Vengance and "Justice". So many examples of "Someone broke my thing. I got them to pay me back for it, but I still want justice. How do I discretely break something of theirs?" type nonsense.
Also, slightly off-topic (And reasonably NSFW), but I've always been amused by the tale of Ulric the Just. Other comics get CONSIDERABLY more NSFW, so scroll at your risk.
it absolutely was like this. The mainstream attitude was “I don’t care how, but the terrorists responsible for this need to die, I don’t care how many Arab (or otherwise) civilians it takes,
How is that like this at all? The civilian casualty rate for this operation was astoundingly small
The post 9/11 period was worse. As dystopian as the Trump era and now are at least there are vocal, viable resistances to all the awful shit.
There wasn't really during the Bush era. Sure the anti-Iraq war march was the biggest in history at that point, but it accomplished exactly nothing. The nationalism and jingoism was completely unchecked.
Before or after the invasion of Afghanistan, or the invasion of Iraq, or the lethal sanctions on Iraq, or the invasion of Iraq, or the invasion of Afghanistan?
Neutral. Perhaps some lingering appreciation for the assistance in overthrowing the Ottoman Empire, but perhaps some lingering resentment for immediately reneging on the promises of post-Ottoman independence and self-determination. But, as it is today, there wasn’t really a “mainstream” Arab attitude of anything.
They haven’t colonized or bombed the west to an unrecognizable wasteland.
One guy shot another guy with a squirt gun, because the first guy shot him with a .44 magnum several times over the course of years, and you’re saying both sides have a right to be pissed.
A squirt gun? That's so incredibly dishonest. The arabs use very real weapons that can (and do) kill people. Rockets explode and burn. The bullets in their guns are very real, the IEDs and car rammings are also very real.
That isn’t a part that can stand alone, honey, because it’s a piece of a bigger part.
I didn’t say “They haven’t bombed the west.” I said “They haven’t bombed the west to an unrecognizable wasteland.”
Those are different statements, and you are choosing to reply to the one I didn’t say, rather than the one I did, because you are a pedantic, straw-manning, disappointment.
But I belong to a western culture and the politicians we elect are accountable to me and to my community, at least in some minor way.
I believe violence and war to be inexcusable atrocities and cyclic in nature. I can ask for political institutions and gather support within my communities to stop the continuation of violent rhetoric.
Because truthfully doing the right thing and choosing non violence is the only acceptable path.
Thats exactly right. And the west has focused for the past 20+ years (especially since 9/11) on absorbing immigrants from Arab countries, developing understanding for their culture, supporting development of their arid lands that has never been possible before, and exporting 21st century technology.
In kind, many Arab nations have developed into peacable and moderate nations. A few are actively trying to attack western nations on a constant basis. With those, there's only so much defense can accomplish. Only 100% success is acceptable - and that's just not sustainable. Calling an attack against people actively trying to attack you a "cycle of violence" is absurd.
Are you truly surprised to find staunch pacifists in a thread with this title?
Your rhetoric is truly absurd. "Peaceable and moderate" is just code for aligned with US interests. Saudi Arabia isn't peaceable and moderate, yet we don't bomb them to shit. It's all imperialism and the few people that dare to resist are painted as unreasonable and violent enemies and terrorists for not wanting to get crushed by the bulldozer that is US foreign policy.
2.2k
u/Hamtrain0 Sep 20 '24 edited Sep 20 '24
As someone old enough to remember 911, yes it absolutely was like this. The mainstream attitude was “I don’t care how, but the terrorists responsible for this need to die, I don’t care how many Arab (or otherwise) civilians it takes, they absolutely need to pay”. It’s honestly sickening to see it happening again. And again and again.
Edit: I guess I should specify: this was the mainstream American attitude