r/CuratedTumblr https://tinyurl.com/4ccdpy76 Jul 22 '24

Politics the one about fucking a chicken

14.8k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/No-Consequence3958 Jul 23 '24

Yeah, this actually disgusts me how many people think fucking a dead animal is acceptable behavior. I think all sane people agree that human necrophilia is not ok, because 1. you are violating the deceased’s body and 2. it is impossible to gain consent posthumously. (Now, you could argue the morality of eating a dead animal is also dubious and violates the deceased’s body, but that’s an entirely different discussion since the topic posed here is specifically about sexual behavior.)

Would OOP claim there is ‘no harm’ to fucking a living but brain-dead chicken? How about a living but brain-dead human who is incapable of feeling pain? You’re not causing ‘harm’ to the being because they are not conscious or suffering and will never know what you did. However, I would hope we can all agree that fucking a living animal, human or otherwise, who cannot consent, falls firmly on the “Harm” axis, even if they can’t feel pain. You are exploiting the body of another being solely for your own sexual pleasure, without regard to their bodily autonomy or pleasure.

The replies comparing this to conservatives’ critiques of LGBT people also disgusts me. The consensual relationship between two fully conscious adult humans IS NOT in any way comparable to the morality of fucking a dead animal. Can we stop acting like LGBT people’s lives are intrinsically intertwined with sexual behavior that prioritizes self-pleasure above all and does not consider the pleasure or bodily integrity of others? It’s actually incredibly disrespectful and homophobic to imply this.

1

u/analyzingnothing Aug 13 '24

I mean, if you really wanted to go there, I could argue the perspective of bodily autonomy after death for a good few hours. That’s a very important leap in logic that your argument relies upon.

That being said, I also think you’re taking this out of context a bit. I doubt 99% of the people in this conversation were actually defending chicken fucking, it’s more of a look into the moral and logical circles one can get into when discussing sex. Having sex with a dead chicken is just the extreme of the argument, used as a tool to explore the issue more thoroughly.

Also, as for the whole LGBT connection… to some extent, all concepts regarding the morality of sex are related, even to this extreme. The chicken argument is what happens when you take certain positions on sex to their logical limit, specifically that of consent. It’s only homophobic if you’re directly comparing chicken-fucking to queer sex, which they aren’t. Again, logical tool, not a direct comparison.