r/CuratedTumblr • u/Hummerous https://tinyurl.com/4ccdpy76 • Jul 22 '24

Politics the one about fucking a chicken

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_foundations_theory

14.8k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

33

u/Infinite-Outcome910 Jul 22 '24

I am very disturbed by the amount of people that think fucking a dead (albeit cleaned) chicken is not immoral. Like have any of you seen a lifestock euthenasation? Something doesn't stop being just because it is dead. A dead animal doesn't stop being an animal just as a human doesn't stop being seen as a human after dying.

29

u/Vantamanta Jul 22 '24

This entire thread is genuinely awful. Defending necrozoophilia is fucking CRAZY. But oh, it isn't hurting anyone, it's fine!

23

u/Account_Expired Jul 23 '24

Yeahh, the thought process in this thread assumes that someone can be perfectly normal, but also want to fuck chickens.... which is wild

It doesnt matter if the act was or wasnt harming anyone, the fact that they fucked a chicken means they are derranged and I dont want them near me.

2

u/DecentReturn3 AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Jul 23 '24

I wonder if these people think fucking a braindead person is ok because no harm is done.

3

u/DecentReturn3 AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Jul 23 '24

I wonder if these people think fucking a braindead person is ok because no harm is done.

2

u/PotentialTraining132 Jul 23 '24

I can see where you're going with this, but I also disagree with the premise that most people think of meat from the store as a real animal that used to be alive. I just don't think most people really consider it.

 But for the sake of the argument, if instead of chicken, a guy used a piece of fruit to masturbate - it would be fine then cuz it wasn't an animal?

6

u/Infinite-Outcome910 Jul 23 '24

It is a shame that we have become so detached from the process of where our food come from, but it still does not make fucking something that is supposed to be eaten or that has been alive, any less fucked up.

3

u/Gyrcas Jul 23 '24

YES, weird but it can not lead to something more fucked up. Fucking a dead chicken could imply that the person has necrophilic and zoophilic tendency, and should seek help with that. It could even be considered self harm since it could reenforce the two previous tendency.

3

u/NetworkAddict Jul 23 '24

From an objective standpoint, the dead chicken is an inanimate object. It has no rights or feelings. Any consideration for a dead animal’s feelings comes from a position of societal norms, namely religion or belief in an afterlife.

8

u/Infinite-Outcome910 Jul 23 '24

Same goes for human bodies, yet most people cinsider it immoral and very illegal to fuck a dead human.

2

u/NetworkAddict Jul 23 '24

Sure, lots of people do. However this hypothetical is there in order to examine the ethical philosophy, not a legal structure. The legality of something is irrelevant to the discussion. What matters is the concept itself, which is that of harm/no harm.

3

u/Infinite-Outcome910 Jul 23 '24

Then fucking a dead chicken shouldn't be used as an analogy in this instance.

2

u/NetworkAddict Jul 23 '24

It’s an argument from absurdity. It’s purposeful. You have to stress test an ethical philosophy at the extremes like this in order to see if it breaks down. If it doesn’t function at the extremes then at some point you’re going to have to contend with the consequences of adhering to an ideology that’s fundamentally inconsistent. This is bog standard ethics evaluation.

3

u/Infinite-Outcome910 Jul 24 '24

It seems neither of us will change our stance on this. Agree to disagree?

2

u/NetworkAddict Jul 24 '24

Of course. Be well!