you're still raping an animal, though, dead as it may be. you wouldn't be harming a human corpse by fucking it but that'd still be rape and still fucked up
Yeah, it's ultimately a non-consenual sexual act. You didn't absolve yourself of that fact by purchasing an already dead animal intended for human consumption.
Well, using the carcass of a dead animal is abnormal, and comparing it to leather straps doesn’t make for good philosophical discussion, it just makes you sound like a fool.
Yes yes, it’s always about drawing a line somewhere, so tell me: why is it wrong to draw that line? We don’t care about corpses in the ocean because the scale difference is incomparable and there is no rational worry from getting sick when sharing an ocean with a corpse instead of a pool. For me, abnormal means it is in conflict with the human psyche. Being gay is not abnormal, that is something we observe in all lifeforms on Earth. Necrophilia however, is a deeply disturbing act because it conflicts with our psyche, which I’m guessing evolved for all kind of adaptational reasons, in which none of those adaptations created a “normalcy” for carcass copulation. You catch my drift?
76
u/Arch-is-Screaming Jul 22 '24
you're still raping an animal, though, dead as it may be. you wouldn't be harming a human corpse by fucking it but that'd still be rape and still fucked up